Early weight-bearing after acetabular fractures in the older patient: a systematic review.

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Marte I Lommerse, Anna H M Mennen, Frank W Bloemers, Hanna C Willems, Daphne van Embden
{"title":"Early weight-bearing after acetabular fractures in the older patient: a systematic review.","authors":"Marte I Lommerse, Anna H M Mennen, Frank W Bloemers, Hanna C Willems, Daphne van Embden","doi":"10.1530/EOR-2024-0191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>While the incidence of acetabular fractures keeps rising among our older patient population, age-specific rehabilitation guidelines are lacking. Post-surgery weight-bearing is often restricted for 8-12 weeks to avoid secondary fixation failure. However, non- or restricted weight-bearing commonly results in atrophy, and older patients are at additional risk of long-term mobility and functionality loss. Therefore, if the risk of secondary fracture failure proves to be lower than currently believed, early or permissive weight-bearing might actually be the preferred treatment choice to advance fracture healing and decrease recovery time. This study aims to review the current literature on early weight-bearing outcomes of acetabular fractures in older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of two databases was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Eligible studies reported on early weight-bearing outcomes of older patients after surgical management. Data were showed in tables alongside a narrative synthesis. Critical appraisal and risk-of-bias tools assessed the study quality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six studies were included with a retrospective or observational design, with a total of 147 patients averaging 64 years old. The majority of studies discussed early weight-bearing protocols after percutaneous fixation (PF), with heterogeneity in terminology across protocols.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Albeit limited and low in evidence, the included studies suggest that early weight-bearing might be a possible alternative for non- or minimally displaced fractures and displaced fractures after PF and open reduction internal fixation, respectively. When risk assessments and functional outcomes are appropriately investigated, early weight-bearing may help patients, especially older adults, avoid suffering and prolonged rehabilitation periods.</p>","PeriodicalId":48598,"journal":{"name":"Efort Open Reviews","volume":"10 9","pages":"718-725"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12412364/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Efort Open Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1530/EOR-2024-0191","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: While the incidence of acetabular fractures keeps rising among our older patient population, age-specific rehabilitation guidelines are lacking. Post-surgery weight-bearing is often restricted for 8-12 weeks to avoid secondary fixation failure. However, non- or restricted weight-bearing commonly results in atrophy, and older patients are at additional risk of long-term mobility and functionality loss. Therefore, if the risk of secondary fracture failure proves to be lower than currently believed, early or permissive weight-bearing might actually be the preferred treatment choice to advance fracture healing and decrease recovery time. This study aims to review the current literature on early weight-bearing outcomes of acetabular fractures in older adults.

Methods: A systematic search of two databases was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Eligible studies reported on early weight-bearing outcomes of older patients after surgical management. Data were showed in tables alongside a narrative synthesis. Critical appraisal and risk-of-bias tools assessed the study quality.

Results: Six studies were included with a retrospective or observational design, with a total of 147 patients averaging 64 years old. The majority of studies discussed early weight-bearing protocols after percutaneous fixation (PF), with heterogeneity in terminology across protocols.

Conclusions: Albeit limited and low in evidence, the included studies suggest that early weight-bearing might be a possible alternative for non- or minimally displaced fractures and displaced fractures after PF and open reduction internal fixation, respectively. When risk assessments and functional outcomes are appropriately investigated, early weight-bearing may help patients, especially older adults, avoid suffering and prolonged rehabilitation periods.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

老年患者髋臼骨折后早期负重:一项系统综述。
目的:虽然老年患者髋臼骨折的发生率持续上升,但缺乏针对年龄的康复指南。术后通常限制负重8-12周,以避免二次固定失败。然而,非或限制性负重通常会导致肌肉萎缩,老年患者有长期活动能力和功能丧失的额外风险。因此,如果继发性骨折失败的风险比目前认为的要低,那么早期或允许负重可能实际上是促进骨折愈合和缩短恢复时间的首选治疗选择。本研究旨在回顾目前关于老年人髋臼骨折早期负重结局的文献。方法:按照PRISMA指南系统检索两个数据库。符合条件的研究报告了手术治疗后老年患者的早期负重结果。数据以表格形式显示,并附有叙述综合。关键评价和偏倚风险工具评估了研究质量。结果:6项研究纳入回顾性或观察性设计,共147例患者,平均年龄64岁。大多数研究讨论了经皮固定(PF)后的早期负重方案,不同方案的术语存在异质性。结论:虽然证据有限,但纳入的研究表明,早期负重可能是PF和切开复位内固定后非或最小移位骨折和移位骨折的可能替代方法。当风险评估和功能结果得到适当调查时,早期负重可能有助于患者,特别是老年人,避免痛苦和延长康复期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Efort Open Reviews
Efort Open Reviews Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: EFORT Open Reviews publishes high-quality instructional review articles across the whole field of orthopaedics and traumatology. Commissioned, peer-reviewed articles from international experts summarize current knowledge and practice in orthopaedics, with the aim of providing systematic coverage of the field. All articles undergo rigorous scientific editing to ensure the highest standards of accuracy and clarity. This continuously published online journal is fully open access and will provide integrated CME. It is an authoritative resource for educating trainees and supports practising orthopaedic surgeons in keeping informed about the latest clinical and scientific advances. One print issue containing a selection of papers from the journal will be published each year to coincide with the EFORT Annual Congress. EFORT Open Reviews is the official journal of the European Federation of National Associations of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (EFORT) and is published in partnership with The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信