Healthcare Utilization and Cost in the Two Years Before Neuromodulation Implantation Among Medicaid Enrollees with Drug-Resistant Epilepsy.

IF 2.2 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research Pub Date : 2025-08-28 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/CEOR.S551202
Kathryn Evans, Qian Li, Lu Zhang, Sandi Lam, Bronwyn Do Rego, Vanessa Danielson, Reginald Lassagne, Ariel Berger
{"title":"Healthcare Utilization and Cost in the Two Years Before Neuromodulation Implantation Among Medicaid Enrollees with Drug-Resistant Epilepsy.","authors":"Kathryn Evans, Qian Li, Lu Zhang, Sandi Lam, Bronwyn Do Rego, Vanessa Danielson, Reginald Lassagne, Ariel Berger","doi":"10.2147/CEOR.S551202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current treatment guidelines recommend consideration of neurostimulators and other alternative treatments to antiseizure medications in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). This study assessed patterns of utilization and cost of healthcare services and prescription pharmacotherapies during the 2-year period before neurostimulator implantation among Medicaid enrollees with DRE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, observational cohort study used healthcare claims and enrollment data obtained from the US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Medicaid enrollees who met study selection criteria (ie, evidence of DRE and neurostimulator implantation) between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2020, were included. Those without antiseizure medication (ASM) dispenses within 12 months of their implantation date or continuous enrollment for the 24-month period before this date were excluded. Demographic/clinical characteristics, utilization and cost of healthcare services, and prescription pharmacotherapies were assessed over the 2-year period before implantation. Care was designated as all-cause or epilepsy-related; the latter was defined as all ASM dispenses and all claims for medical care (ie, inpatient or outpatient) with a diagnosis code (any position) of epilepsy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 2469 patients met the selection criteria. Mean age at implantation was 20.8 years. Comorbidities were common. Over the 2-year period before implantation, patients were prescribed a mean of 4.4 unique ASMs. Fifty-seven percent had at least one all-cause hospital admission, and 82.9% had at least one all-cause emergency department visit; corresponding epilepsy-related values were 55.3% and 66.1%. Less than half of patients received specific cranial imaging, including video electroencephalographs. Total mean all-cause healthcare costs were $117,013; epilepsy-related healthcare costs accounted for $48,169 (41.2%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Medicaid enrollees with DRE experience high use and cost of healthcare services and pharmacotherapy over the 2 years before neurostimulator implantation. Further research is needed to understand the impacts associated with broader access to specialized epilepsy care, such as cranial imaging and neurostimulators.</p>","PeriodicalId":47313,"journal":{"name":"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research","volume":"17 ","pages":"571-583"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12402825/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S551202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Current treatment guidelines recommend consideration of neurostimulators and other alternative treatments to antiseizure medications in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). This study assessed patterns of utilization and cost of healthcare services and prescription pharmacotherapies during the 2-year period before neurostimulator implantation among Medicaid enrollees with DRE.

Methods: This retrospective, observational cohort study used healthcare claims and enrollment data obtained from the US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Medicaid enrollees who met study selection criteria (ie, evidence of DRE and neurostimulator implantation) between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2020, were included. Those without antiseizure medication (ASM) dispenses within 12 months of their implantation date or continuous enrollment for the 24-month period before this date were excluded. Demographic/clinical characteristics, utilization and cost of healthcare services, and prescription pharmacotherapies were assessed over the 2-year period before implantation. Care was designated as all-cause or epilepsy-related; the latter was defined as all ASM dispenses and all claims for medical care (ie, inpatient or outpatient) with a diagnosis code (any position) of epilepsy.

Results: In total, 2469 patients met the selection criteria. Mean age at implantation was 20.8 years. Comorbidities were common. Over the 2-year period before implantation, patients were prescribed a mean of 4.4 unique ASMs. Fifty-seven percent had at least one all-cause hospital admission, and 82.9% had at least one all-cause emergency department visit; corresponding epilepsy-related values were 55.3% and 66.1%. Less than half of patients received specific cranial imaging, including video electroencephalographs. Total mean all-cause healthcare costs were $117,013; epilepsy-related healthcare costs accounted for $48,169 (41.2%).

Conclusion: Medicaid enrollees with DRE experience high use and cost of healthcare services and pharmacotherapy over the 2 years before neurostimulator implantation. Further research is needed to understand the impacts associated with broader access to specialized epilepsy care, such as cranial imaging and neurostimulators.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

医疗补助计划纳入的耐药癫痫患者神经调节植入前两年的医疗保健利用和成本。
背景:目前的治疗指南建议在耐药癫痫(DRE)患者中考虑使用神经刺激剂和其他抗癫痫药物的替代治疗。本研究评估了医疗补助计划登记的DRE患者在神经刺激器植入前2年期间医疗保健服务和处方药物治疗的使用模式和成本。方法:这项回顾性、观察性队列研究使用了从美国医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心获得的医疗索赔和登记数据。纳入2011年1月1日至2020年12月31日期间符合研究选择标准(即有DRE和神经刺激器植入证据)的医疗补助计划参保者。那些在植入日期12个月内没有抗癫痫药物(ASM)配药或在此日期之前连续入组24个月的患者被排除在外。在植入前的2年期间,评估了人口统计学/临床特征、医疗保健服务的利用和成本以及处方药物治疗。护理被指定为全因或癫痫相关;后者被定义为所有ASM分发和所有医疗保健索赔(即住院或门诊)与癫痫的诊断代码(任何位置)。结果:共有2469例患者符合入选标准。平均着床年龄20.8岁。合并症很常见。在植入前的2年期间,患者平均得到4.4次独特的asm。57%的人至少有一次全因住院,82.9%的人至少有一次全因急诊;相应的癫痫相关值分别为55.3%和66.1%。不到一半的患者接受了特殊的颅脑成像,包括视频脑电图。总平均全因医疗费用为117,013美元;与癫痫相关的医疗费用为48,169美元(41.2%)。结论:在神经刺激器植入前的2年内,DRE患者经历了高使用率和高成本的医疗服务和药物治疗。需要进一步的研究来了解与更广泛地获得专门的癫痫治疗(如颅成像和神经刺激器)相关的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信