Real-World Disability Outcomes Among Patients Treated with Cariprazine vs Other Atypical Antipsychotics as Adjunctive Treatment for Major Depressive Disorder.

IF 2.2 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research Pub Date : 2025-08-28 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/CEOR.S522756
Prakash S Masand, Mousam Parikh, Jamie T Ta, Sally W Wade, Filmon Haile, Susannah Ripley, Enrico Zanardo, Colleen S Spencer, François Laliberté, Nadia Nabulsi
{"title":"Real-World Disability Outcomes Among Patients Treated with Cariprazine vs Other Atypical Antipsychotics as Adjunctive Treatment for Major Depressive Disorder.","authors":"Prakash S Masand, Mousam Parikh, Jamie T Ta, Sally W Wade, Filmon Haile, Susannah Ripley, Enrico Zanardo, Colleen S Spencer, François Laliberté, Nadia Nabulsi","doi":"10.2147/CEOR.S522756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a disabling condition that may require adjunctive treatment with atypical antipsychotics (AAs). However, little is known about how different adjunctive AAs impact disability outcomes. This analysis compared disability events, days, and costs among patients with MDD before and after initiating adjunctive treatment with cariprazine, brexpiprazole, or aripiprazole, which all belong to a class of AAs known as dopamine partial agonists.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The Merative<sup>TM</sup> MarketScan<sup>®</sup> Commercial Database and the Health and Productivity Management Database (1/1/2015-12/31/2022) were used to identify adults with MDD and ≥2 dispensings of cariprazine, brexpiprazole, or aripiprazole (first dispensing=index) adjunctive to antidepressant therapy. Baseline characteristics between cohorts were balanced using inverse probability of treatment weighting. Changes (post-index minus pre-index) in all-cause and mental health (MH)-related disability claim rates, days, and costs were compared for cariprazine vs brexpiprazole and cariprazine vs aripiprazole via a difference-in-difference analysis; 95% CIs were generated using nonparametric bootstrap procedures. <i>P</i>-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the cariprazine (n=224) vs brexpiprazole (n=643) analysis, the cariprazine cohort had significantly greater reductions in all-cause disability claims, days, and costs vs the brexpiprazole cohort (between-cohort difference: -0.23 claims [<i>P</i><0.05], -25.27 days [<i>P</i><0.001], -$4577.08 [<i>P</i><0.01], respectively). The cariprazine cohort also had a significantly greater reduction in MH-related disability days (-12.07 [<i>P</i><0.05]); reductions in MH-related disability claims and mean costs vs brexpiprazole were similar. In the cariprazine (n=174) vs aripiprazole (n=2931) analysis, a significantly greater reduction for cariprazine vs aripiprazole was observed for all-cause and MH-related disability costs (all-cause: -$3275.91 [<i>P</i><0.01]; MH-related: -$2196.36 [<i>P</i><0.05]); reductions in all-cause and MH-related disability claims and days were similar.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this real-world analysis of patients with MDD using AAs adjunctively to antidepressants, significantly greater reductions were observed in disability claims and days for cariprazine vs brexpiprazole and in disability costs for cariprazine vs aripiprazole. These results suggest that adjunctive cariprazine may have beneficial effects on disability outcomes for patients with MDD.</p>","PeriodicalId":47313,"journal":{"name":"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research","volume":"17 ","pages":"585-600"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12402709/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S522756","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a disabling condition that may require adjunctive treatment with atypical antipsychotics (AAs). However, little is known about how different adjunctive AAs impact disability outcomes. This analysis compared disability events, days, and costs among patients with MDD before and after initiating adjunctive treatment with cariprazine, brexpiprazole, or aripiprazole, which all belong to a class of AAs known as dopamine partial agonists.

Patients and methods: The MerativeTM MarketScan® Commercial Database and the Health and Productivity Management Database (1/1/2015-12/31/2022) were used to identify adults with MDD and ≥2 dispensings of cariprazine, brexpiprazole, or aripiprazole (first dispensing=index) adjunctive to antidepressant therapy. Baseline characteristics between cohorts were balanced using inverse probability of treatment weighting. Changes (post-index minus pre-index) in all-cause and mental health (MH)-related disability claim rates, days, and costs were compared for cariprazine vs brexpiprazole and cariprazine vs aripiprazole via a difference-in-difference analysis; 95% CIs were generated using nonparametric bootstrap procedures. P-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results: In the cariprazine (n=224) vs brexpiprazole (n=643) analysis, the cariprazine cohort had significantly greater reductions in all-cause disability claims, days, and costs vs the brexpiprazole cohort (between-cohort difference: -0.23 claims [P<0.05], -25.27 days [P<0.001], -$4577.08 [P<0.01], respectively). The cariprazine cohort also had a significantly greater reduction in MH-related disability days (-12.07 [P<0.05]); reductions in MH-related disability claims and mean costs vs brexpiprazole were similar. In the cariprazine (n=174) vs aripiprazole (n=2931) analysis, a significantly greater reduction for cariprazine vs aripiprazole was observed for all-cause and MH-related disability costs (all-cause: -$3275.91 [P<0.01]; MH-related: -$2196.36 [P<0.05]); reductions in all-cause and MH-related disability claims and days were similar.

Conclusion: In this real-world analysis of patients with MDD using AAs adjunctively to antidepressants, significantly greater reductions were observed in disability claims and days for cariprazine vs brexpiprazole and in disability costs for cariprazine vs aripiprazole. These results suggest that adjunctive cariprazine may have beneficial effects on disability outcomes for patients with MDD.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Cariprazine与其他非典型抗精神病药物作为辅助治疗重度抑郁症患者的现实残疾结局
目的:重度抑郁症(MDD)是一种可能需要非典型抗精神病药物(AAs)辅助治疗的致残疾病。然而,关于不同辅助性AAs如何影响残疾结局,我们知之甚少。该分析比较了MDD患者在开始卡吡嗪、布雷哌唑或阿立哌唑辅助治疗前后的残疾事件、天数和费用,这些药物都属于一类被称为多巴胺部分激动剂的AAs。患者和方法:使用MerativeTM MarketScan®商业数据库和健康与生产力管理数据库(2015年1月1日- 2022年12月31日)来识别患有重度抑郁症的成年人,并在抗抑郁治疗中使用了≥2次卡吡嗪、布雷哌唑或阿立哌唑(首次配药=指数)辅助治疗。使用治疗加权的逆概率来平衡队列间的基线特征。通过差异中差异分析比较了卡吡嗪与brexpiprazole、卡吡嗪与aripiprazole的全因和精神健康(MH)相关伤残索赔率、天数和费用的变化(指数后减去指数前);95% ci是使用非参数自举程序生成的。p值结果:在卡吡嗪(n=224)和布雷克斯哌唑(n=643)的分析中,卡吡嗪组比布雷克斯哌唑组在全因残疾索赔、天数和费用方面的减少显著大于布雷克斯哌唑组(队列间差异:-0.23索赔)。在对使用抗抑郁药辅助抗抑郁药的重度抑郁症患者的实际分析中,观察到卡吡嗪与布雷西哌唑相比,在残疾索赔和天数方面,卡吡嗪与阿立哌唑在残疾费用方面的显著降低。这些结果表明,辅助卡吡嗪可能对重度抑郁症患者的残疾结局有有益的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信