Volume-outcome relationships for primary total elbow arthroplasty surgery in England: Analysis of the hospital episode statistics dataset.

IF 1.1 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Thomas D Stringfellow, David Butt, Deborah Higgs, Mark Falworth, Timothy Wr Briggs, William K Gray
{"title":"Volume-outcome relationships for primary total elbow arthroplasty surgery in England: Analysis of the hospital episode statistics dataset.","authors":"Thomas D Stringfellow, David Butt, Deborah Higgs, Mark Falworth, Timothy Wr Briggs, William K Gray","doi":"10.1177/17585732251360756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) is a low-volume, high-complexity procedure and clinical guidelines recommend moving to a centralised network model. The aim of the study was to assess the effect of surgeon and unit volume on patient and service level clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Analysis the Hospital Episodes Statistics database (HES) for elective and emergency primary TEA surgery between January 2014 and December 2023 was performed. The exposures of interest were surgeon and trust volume in the 12 months preceding index surgery. The primary outcome was revision surgery within 12 months of index procedure. Secondary outcomes were 30-day emergency readmission and length of stay (LOS) greater than the median.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 4101 primary TEA cases performed in 123 trusts were included. One-year revision and 30-day emergency readmission were not associated with trust or surgeon volume. LOS greater than the median showed a significant association with both surgeon and unit TEA volume. Patients undergoing primary TEA by surgeons performing fewer than 10 cases per year have three times the likelihood of LOS over three days.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There are significant resource savings from networked service reconfiguration. Careful monitoring of clinical outcomes is required, ideally using patient reported outcomes in addition to implant survival, readmission and LOS.</p>","PeriodicalId":36705,"journal":{"name":"Shoulder and Elbow","volume":" ","pages":"17585732251360756"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12401953/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shoulder and Elbow","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17585732251360756","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) is a low-volume, high-complexity procedure and clinical guidelines recommend moving to a centralised network model. The aim of the study was to assess the effect of surgeon and unit volume on patient and service level clinical outcomes.

Methods: Analysis the Hospital Episodes Statistics database (HES) for elective and emergency primary TEA surgery between January 2014 and December 2023 was performed. The exposures of interest were surgeon and trust volume in the 12 months preceding index surgery. The primary outcome was revision surgery within 12 months of index procedure. Secondary outcomes were 30-day emergency readmission and length of stay (LOS) greater than the median.

Results: In total, 4101 primary TEA cases performed in 123 trusts were included. One-year revision and 30-day emergency readmission were not associated with trust or surgeon volume. LOS greater than the median showed a significant association with both surgeon and unit TEA volume. Patients undergoing primary TEA by surgeons performing fewer than 10 cases per year have three times the likelihood of LOS over three days.

Conclusion: There are significant resource savings from networked service reconfiguration. Careful monitoring of clinical outcomes is required, ideally using patient reported outcomes in addition to implant survival, readmission and LOS.

英格兰初次全肘关节置换术的容量-结果关系:医院事件统计数据集分析
背景:全肘关节置换术(TEA)是一种小体积、高复杂性的手术,临床指南建议转向集中网络模型。该研究的目的是评估外科医生和单位体积对患者和服务水平临床结果的影响。方法:分析2014年1月至2023年12月进行的选择性和急诊原发性TEA手术的医院事件统计数据库(HES)。在指数手术前12个月的兴趣暴露是外科医生和信任量。主要结果为指数手术后12个月内的翻修手术。次要结局是30天的紧急再入院和住院时间(LOS)大于中位数。结果:共纳入123家医院的原发性TEA病例4101例。1年复查和30天急诊再入院与信任或外科医生数量无关。LOS大于中位数与外科医生和单位TEA体积均有显著相关性。由每年少于10例的外科医生进行初级TEA的患者在三天内发生LOS的可能性是其三倍。结论:网络服务重构可显著节约资源。需要仔细监测临床结果,理想情况下,除了植入物存活、再入院和LOS外,还需要使用患者报告的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Shoulder and Elbow
Shoulder and Elbow Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信