A Metrics-Driven Approach to Develop a Hybrid Model of Staffing and Workload Balance in the NGHA Hospitals.

IF 3.8 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Journal of Healthcare Leadership Pub Date : 2025-08-26 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JHL.S532533
Meshari Al-Abdulkarim, Mohsen Bakouri, Ahmad Alassaf
{"title":"A Metrics-Driven Approach to Develop a Hybrid Model of Staffing and Workload Balance in the NGHA Hospitals.","authors":"Meshari Al-Abdulkarim, Mohsen Bakouri, Ahmad Alassaf","doi":"10.2147/JHL.S532533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Clinical Engineering Departments (CEDs) face growing challenges in managing rapidly evolving medical technologies and increasing equipment inventories under constrained budgets and limited human resources. These pressures often result in strained staffing capacity and imbalanced workload distribution. This study aimed to develop and validate a metrics-driven hybrid staffing model to optimize workforce allocation and improve workload efficiency across National Guard Health Affairs (NGHA) hospitals in Saudi Arabia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five years of maintenance data were extracted from the Computerized Maintenance Management System (CMMS) and Oracle E-Business Suite. These data were analyzed to construct a hybrid staffing model that combined quantitative workload metrics with qualitative input from clinical engineering staff across 11 NGHA hospitals. Model validation included a detailed case study at King Abdullah Specialized Children's Hospital (KASCH), with comparisons to existing staffing models, including the Ottawa Hospital approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The case study revealed that the current staffing of 14 full-time equivalents (FTEs) at KASCH was insufficient, with the model projecting a requirement of 17 FTEs, indicating a 7.8% shortfall. Workload analysis showed highly uneven staff utilization rates, ranging from 20.8% to 71.5%. High-maintenance equipment, such as MRI machines, required up to 42.1 hours per device annually. The proposed hybrid model achieved more balanced staffing, predictive maintenance scheduling, and dynamic task assignments. Compared to traditional models, it demonstrated an estimated 25% cost savings, equipment uptime exceeding 95%, and improved workload distribution.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The hybrid staffing model provides a data-driven framework that integrates preventive and corrective maintenance requirements with staff input to support risk-based decisions. While validated within the NGHA system, the model is adaptable for healthcare facilities with different device profiles, regulatory pressures, and financial constraints. Successful implementation depends on strong institutional leadership, continuous data collection, and comprehensive staff training to ensure long-term sustainability and scalability.</p>","PeriodicalId":44346,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Healthcare Leadership","volume":"17 ","pages":"395-416"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12399791/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Healthcare Leadership","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JHL.S532533","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Clinical Engineering Departments (CEDs) face growing challenges in managing rapidly evolving medical technologies and increasing equipment inventories under constrained budgets and limited human resources. These pressures often result in strained staffing capacity and imbalanced workload distribution. This study aimed to develop and validate a metrics-driven hybrid staffing model to optimize workforce allocation and improve workload efficiency across National Guard Health Affairs (NGHA) hospitals in Saudi Arabia.

Methods: Five years of maintenance data were extracted from the Computerized Maintenance Management System (CMMS) and Oracle E-Business Suite. These data were analyzed to construct a hybrid staffing model that combined quantitative workload metrics with qualitative input from clinical engineering staff across 11 NGHA hospitals. Model validation included a detailed case study at King Abdullah Specialized Children's Hospital (KASCH), with comparisons to existing staffing models, including the Ottawa Hospital approach.

Results: The case study revealed that the current staffing of 14 full-time equivalents (FTEs) at KASCH was insufficient, with the model projecting a requirement of 17 FTEs, indicating a 7.8% shortfall. Workload analysis showed highly uneven staff utilization rates, ranging from 20.8% to 71.5%. High-maintenance equipment, such as MRI machines, required up to 42.1 hours per device annually. The proposed hybrid model achieved more balanced staffing, predictive maintenance scheduling, and dynamic task assignments. Compared to traditional models, it demonstrated an estimated 25% cost savings, equipment uptime exceeding 95%, and improved workload distribution.

Discussion: The hybrid staffing model provides a data-driven framework that integrates preventive and corrective maintenance requirements with staff input to support risk-based decisions. While validated within the NGHA system, the model is adaptable for healthcare facilities with different device profiles, regulatory pressures, and financial constraints. Successful implementation depends on strong institutional leadership, continuous data collection, and comprehensive staff training to ensure long-term sustainability and scalability.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

一个指标驱动的方法来开发一个混合模式的人员配置和工作负载平衡在全国医院。
简介:临床工程部门(ced)在管理快速发展的医疗技术和在有限的预算和有限的人力资源下增加设备库存方面面临越来越大的挑战。这些压力往往造成人员配置能力紧张和工作量分配不平衡。本研究旨在开发和验证一个指标驱动的混合人员配置模型,以优化沙特阿拉伯国民警卫队卫生事务(NGHA)医院的劳动力分配和提高工作量效率。方法:从计算机维修管理系统(CMMS)和Oracle E-Business Suite中提取5年的维修数据。对这些数据进行分析,构建了一个混合人员配置模型,该模型将定量工作量指标与来自11家NGHA医院的临床工程人员的定性输入相结合。模型验证包括在阿卜杜拉国王专科儿童医院(KASCH)进行详细的案例研究,并与现有的人员配置模型(包括渥太华医院的方法)进行比较。结果:案例研究显示,目前KASCH的14名全职工作人员(fte)不足,模型预测需要17名全职工作人员,表明缺口为7.8%。工作量分析显示,员工利用率极不均衡,从20.8%到71.5%不等。高维护设备,如核磁共振成像仪,每年每台设备需要高达42.1小时。提出的混合模型实现了更平衡的人员配置、预测性维护计划和动态任务分配。与传统模型相比,它节省了约25%的成本,设备正常运行时间超过95%,并改善了工作负载分配。讨论:混合人员配置模型提供了一个数据驱动的框架,该框架将预防性和纠正性维护需求与人员输入集成在一起,以支持基于风险的决策。虽然在NGHA系统中进行了验证,但该模型适用于具有不同设备配置、监管压力和财务限制的医疗保健机构。成功的实施取决于强有力的机构领导、持续的数据收集和全面的员工培训,以确保长期的可持续性和可扩展性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Healthcare Leadership
Journal of Healthcare Leadership HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
2.30%
发文量
27
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Efficient and successful modern healthcare depends on a growing group of professionals working together as an interdisciplinary team. However, many forces shape the delivery of healthcare; changes are being driven by the markets, transformations in concepts of health and wellbeing, technology and research and discovery. Dynamic leadership will guide these necessary transformations. The Journal of Healthcare Leadership is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on leadership for the healthcare professions. The publication strives to amalgamate current and future healthcare professionals and managers by providing key insights into leadership progress and challenges to improve patient care. The journal aspires to inform key decision makers and those professionals with ambitions of leadership and management; it seeks to connect professionals who are engaged in similar endeavours and to provide wisdom from those working in other industries. Senior and trainee doctors, nurses and allied healthcare professionals, medical students, healthcare managers and allied leaders are invited to contribute to this publication
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信