Assistive technology for higher education students with disabilities: Knowledge and skills of teaching staff.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Konstantinos Papadopoulos, Eleni Koustriava, Elena Chronopoulou, Rafael Molina Carmona, Flavio Manganello, Lisander Isaraj, Vasiliki Giannouli, Theofilos Papadopoulos, José María Fernández Gil
{"title":"Assistive technology for higher education students with disabilities: Knowledge and skills of teaching staff.","authors":"Konstantinos Papadopoulos, Eleni Koustriava, Elena Chronopoulou, Rafael Molina Carmona, Flavio Manganello, Lisander Isaraj, Vasiliki Giannouli, Theofilos Papadopoulos, José María Fernández Gil","doi":"10.1080/10400435.2025.2548564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The use of assistive technology in education has been shown to enhance academic performance, increase educational engagement, and improve both academic self-efficacy and the social and psychological well-being of students with disabilities. Despite these proven benefits, assistive technology is not always utilized systematically or effectively. Many educators report feeling insufficiently competent in using assistive technology in the classroom, with their knowledge often being limited. This study aimed to assess higher education teaching staff's knowledge of the features of both assistive and mainstream technology (including devices, software, and apps), as well as their experience in using them. A total of 131 teaching staff members from Italy, Germany, Spain, and Greece participated in the study by completing a questionnaire that included items related to both types of technology. The results indicated that staff members were far more familiar with mainstream technology than with assistive technology, and their knowledge and experience with the latter were limited. Age and prior training emerged as significant predictors of both knowledge and use of assistive technology. Notably, the study highlighted specific types of assistive technology that were more familiar to higher education teaching staff.</p>","PeriodicalId":51568,"journal":{"name":"Assistive Technology","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assistive Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2025.2548564","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of assistive technology in education has been shown to enhance academic performance, increase educational engagement, and improve both academic self-efficacy and the social and psychological well-being of students with disabilities. Despite these proven benefits, assistive technology is not always utilized systematically or effectively. Many educators report feeling insufficiently competent in using assistive technology in the classroom, with their knowledge often being limited. This study aimed to assess higher education teaching staff's knowledge of the features of both assistive and mainstream technology (including devices, software, and apps), as well as their experience in using them. A total of 131 teaching staff members from Italy, Germany, Spain, and Greece participated in the study by completing a questionnaire that included items related to both types of technology. The results indicated that staff members were far more familiar with mainstream technology than with assistive technology, and their knowledge and experience with the latter were limited. Age and prior training emerged as significant predictors of both knowledge and use of assistive technology. Notably, the study highlighted specific types of assistive technology that were more familiar to higher education teaching staff.

高等教育残疾学生的辅助技术:教学人员的知识和技能。
在教育中使用辅助技术已被证明可以提高学业成绩,增加教育参与度,提高学业自我效能以及残疾学生的社会和心理健康。尽管有这些被证明的好处,辅助技术并不总是被系统地或有效地利用。许多教育工作者报告说,他们在课堂上使用辅助技术的能力不足,因为他们的知识往往有限。本研究旨在评估高等教育教学人员对辅助技术和主流技术(包括设备、软件和应用程序)特征的了解情况,以及他们使用这些技术的经验。共有131名来自意大利、德国、西班牙和希腊的教学人员参与了这项研究,他们填写了一份问卷,其中包括与这两种技术相关的项目。结果表明,工作人员对主流技术的熟悉程度远远超过对辅助技术的熟悉程度,而他们对辅助技术的知识和经验是有限的。年龄和先前的培训成为辅助技术知识和使用的重要预测因素。值得注意的是,该研究强调了高等教育教学人员更熟悉的特定类型的辅助技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Assistive Technology
Assistive Technology REHABILITATION-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Assistive Technology is an applied, scientific publication in the multi-disciplinary field of technology for people with disabilities. The journal"s purpose is to foster communication among individuals working in all aspects of the assistive technology arena including researchers, developers, clinicians, educators and consumers. The journal will consider papers from all assistive technology applications. Only original papers will be accepted. Technical notes describing preliminary techniques, procedures, or findings of original scientific research may also be submitted. Letters to the Editor are welcome. Books for review may be sent to authors or publisher.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信