Effect of Esketamine and Etomidate on Postoperative Cognitive Function in Elderly Patients Undergoing Painless retain-->Bronchoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Xiaofeng Xu, Nayu Yang, Wujian Zhu, Jing Yu, Yuan Zhou, Ligang Shan
{"title":"Effect of Esketamine and Etomidate on Postoperative Cognitive Function in Elderly Patients Undergoing Painless retain-->Bronchoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Xiaofeng Xu, Nayu Yang, Wujian Zhu, Jing Yu, Yuan Zhou, Ligang Shan","doi":"10.1016/j.jopan.2025.03.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the effects of different doses of esketamine with etomidate on anesthesia and postoperative cognitive function of elderly patients undergoing painless tracheoscopy.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This was a double-blind, randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, 150 patients over 65 were divided into group A (low-dose: 0.15 mg/kg esketamine + 0.3 mg/kg etomidate), group B (medium-dose: 0.3 mg/kg esketamine + 0.3 mg/kg etomidate), and group C (high-dose: 0.5 mg/kg esketamine + 0.3 mg/kg etomidate), with 50 patients in each group. The primary outcomes included analgesic and sedative effects evaluated via Visual Analog Scale and Ramsay Sedation Score, and cognitive function assessed via the Mini-Mental State Examination preoperatively and at 1 and 3 days postoperatively. Changes in hemodynamic parameters (heart rate and mean arterial pressure), operation duration, and adverse events were also analyzed.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Demographic characteristics of patients in both groups were comparable. Group C exhibited the best analgesic and sedative effects with more stable hemodynamics, with significant differences in the heart rate and mean arterial pressure. The recovery time was prolonged in group C, while no significant differences were noted in operation duration or adverse events, although group C experienced more complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Different doses of esketamine with etomidate had better analgesic and sedative effects, reduced the postoperative cognitive impairment, and provided hemodynamic stability and better safety. A high-dose combination was most effective in analgesia, sedation, and hemodynamic parameter stabilization, while a medium-dose combination yielded the best results for cognitive recovery and fewer adverse effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":49028,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2025.03.010","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of different doses of esketamine with etomidate on anesthesia and postoperative cognitive function of elderly patients undergoing painless tracheoscopy.

Design: This was a double-blind, randomized controlled trial.

Methods: In this study, 150 patients over 65 were divided into group A (low-dose: 0.15 mg/kg esketamine + 0.3 mg/kg etomidate), group B (medium-dose: 0.3 mg/kg esketamine + 0.3 mg/kg etomidate), and group C (high-dose: 0.5 mg/kg esketamine + 0.3 mg/kg etomidate), with 50 patients in each group. The primary outcomes included analgesic and sedative effects evaluated via Visual Analog Scale and Ramsay Sedation Score, and cognitive function assessed via the Mini-Mental State Examination preoperatively and at 1 and 3 days postoperatively. Changes in hemodynamic parameters (heart rate and mean arterial pressure), operation duration, and adverse events were also analyzed.

Findings: Demographic characteristics of patients in both groups were comparable. Group C exhibited the best analgesic and sedative effects with more stable hemodynamics, with significant differences in the heart rate and mean arterial pressure. The recovery time was prolonged in group C, while no significant differences were noted in operation duration or adverse events, although group C experienced more complications.

Conclusions: Different doses of esketamine with etomidate had better analgesic and sedative effects, reduced the postoperative cognitive impairment, and provided hemodynamic stability and better safety. A high-dose combination was most effective in analgesia, sedation, and hemodynamic parameter stabilization, while a medium-dose combination yielded the best results for cognitive recovery and fewer adverse effects.

艾氯胺酮和依托咪酯对老年无痛保留->支气管镜术后认知功能的影响:一项随机对照试验
目的:探讨不同剂量艾氯胺酮联合依托咪酯对老年无痛气管镜患者麻醉及术后认知功能的影响。设计:这是一项双盲、随机对照试验。方法:本研究将150例65岁以上患者分为A组(低剂量:0.15 mg/kg艾氯胺酮+ 0.3 mg/kg依托咪酯)、B组(中剂量:0.3 mg/kg艾氯胺酮+ 0.3 mg/kg依托咪酯)和C组(高剂量:0.5 mg/kg艾氯胺酮+ 0.3 mg/kg依托咪酯),每组50例。主要结果包括通过视觉模拟量表和Ramsay镇静评分评估镇痛和镇静效果,通过术前和术后1天和3天的简易精神状态检查评估认知功能。血流动力学参数(心率和平均动脉压)、手术时间和不良事件的变化也进行了分析。结果:两组患者的人口学特征具有可比性。C组镇痛镇静效果最好,血流动力学更稳定,心率和平均动脉压差异有统计学意义。C组恢复时间延长,手术时间及不良事件无明显差异,但C组并发症较多。结论:不同剂量的艾氯胺酮与依托咪酯联用具有更好的镇痛、镇静效果,减轻了术后认知功能障碍,血流动力学稳定,安全性更好。大剂量联合治疗在镇痛、镇静和血流动力学参数稳定方面最有效,而中剂量联合治疗在认知恢复方面效果最佳,不良反应较少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
17.60%
发文量
279
审稿时长
90 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing provides original, peer-reviewed research for a primary audience that includes nurses in perianesthesia settings, including ambulatory surgery, preadmission testing, postanesthesia care (Phases I and II), extended observation, and pain management. The Journal provides a forum for sharing professional knowledge and experience relating to management, ethics, legislation, research, and other aspects of perianesthesia nursing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信