Antipsychotic Medications for Delirium Treatment in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: A Systematic Review.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Francesca Cavagnero, Annalisa Salerno, Chiara Marchegiani Rizzolli, Luca Marchetto, Valentina Stritoni, Alvise Tosoni, Anna Tessari, Angela Amigoni, Marco Daverio
{"title":"Antipsychotic Medications for Delirium Treatment in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Francesca Cavagnero, Annalisa Salerno, Chiara Marchegiani Rizzolli, Luca Marchetto, Valentina Stritoni, Alvise Tosoni, Anna Tessari, Angela Amigoni, Marco Daverio","doi":"10.1007/s40272-025-00716-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Pediatric delirium (PD) is a common but underdiagnosed condition in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs), affecting 17-66% of patients. It is associated with prolonged ventilation and hospitalization, increased healthcare costs, and mortality. While nonpharmacological approaches are considered first-line treatments, pharmacological interventions are used in refractory cases despite limited pediatric-specific evidence. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pharmacological treatments for PD in PICUs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews [PROSPERO]: CRD42024504618), PubMed, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases were searched for studies published up to February 2024. Eligible studies included children aged 1 month-18 years, diagnosed with PD in the PICU using validated scales or psychiatric evaluation and receiving pharmacologic treatment. Outcomes included delirium improvement or resolution and safety. Risk of bias was assessed using the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies-of Interventions (ROBINS-I) scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 7,309 records, 10 studies involving 283 patients receiving pharmacological treatment met inclusion criteria. All but one of the studies were retrospective and no randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified. Pharmacological treatment was administered to 283 patients, with the most used agents being quetiapine (36%), risperidone (20%), haloperidol (20%), and olanzapine (11%). Seven studies reported variable efficacy, with olanzapine showing significant symptom improvement in one study (olanzapine: N = 31; control: N = 28; F(1,20) = 28.62, r = 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.50-0.90) and the other drugs reporting a trend toward improvement in delirium severity. Adverse events were inconsistently measured and reported throughout studies: 22 cases were reported, with QTc prolongation (11 cases) and dystonia (7 cases) being the most frequent. Dystonia was observed in patients receiving haloperidol, whereas QTc prolongation was reported in those treated with quetiapine or risperidone. Complete resolution of the events was reported in 21/22 cases and occurred after dose adjustment or treatment interruption.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pharmacological interventions for PD in PICU patients showed variable efficacy, and adverse events were reported in a minority of treated patients. The limited sample size, the only modest quality of the studies, and the lack of replication preclude definitive conclusions about the drugs' efficacy. In addition, haloperidol, risperidone, and quetiapine raised some safety concerns. Further research is needed to establish stronger evidence for the pharmacologic treatment of PD in the PICU and to address specific treatment on the basis of delirium subtype.</p>","PeriodicalId":19955,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Drugs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40272-025-00716-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Pediatric delirium (PD) is a common but underdiagnosed condition in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs), affecting 17-66% of patients. It is associated with prolonged ventilation and hospitalization, increased healthcare costs, and mortality. While nonpharmacological approaches are considered first-line treatments, pharmacological interventions are used in refractory cases despite limited pediatric-specific evidence. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pharmacological treatments for PD in PICUs.

Methods: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews [PROSPERO]: CRD42024504618), PubMed, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases were searched for studies published up to February 2024. Eligible studies included children aged 1 month-18 years, diagnosed with PD in the PICU using validated scales or psychiatric evaluation and receiving pharmacologic treatment. Outcomes included delirium improvement or resolution and safety. Risk of bias was assessed using the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies-of Interventions (ROBINS-I) scale.

Results: Of 7,309 records, 10 studies involving 283 patients receiving pharmacological treatment met inclusion criteria. All but one of the studies were retrospective and no randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified. Pharmacological treatment was administered to 283 patients, with the most used agents being quetiapine (36%), risperidone (20%), haloperidol (20%), and olanzapine (11%). Seven studies reported variable efficacy, with olanzapine showing significant symptom improvement in one study (olanzapine: N = 31; control: N = 28; F(1,20) = 28.62, r = 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.50-0.90) and the other drugs reporting a trend toward improvement in delirium severity. Adverse events were inconsistently measured and reported throughout studies: 22 cases were reported, with QTc prolongation (11 cases) and dystonia (7 cases) being the most frequent. Dystonia was observed in patients receiving haloperidol, whereas QTc prolongation was reported in those treated with quetiapine or risperidone. Complete resolution of the events was reported in 21/22 cases and occurred after dose adjustment or treatment interruption.

Conclusions: Pharmacological interventions for PD in PICU patients showed variable efficacy, and adverse events were reported in a minority of treated patients. The limited sample size, the only modest quality of the studies, and the lack of replication preclude definitive conclusions about the drugs' efficacy. In addition, haloperidol, risperidone, and quetiapine raised some safety concerns. Further research is needed to establish stronger evidence for the pharmacologic treatment of PD in the PICU and to address specific treatment on the basis of delirium subtype.

儿童重症监护病房谵妄治疗的抗精神病药物:系统综述。
背景与目的:儿童谵妄(PD)是儿科重症监护病房(picu)中一种常见但未被充分诊断的疾病,影响了17-66%的患者。它与延长通气和住院时间、增加医疗费用和死亡率有关。虽然非药物方法被认为是一线治疗,但药物干预用于难治性病例,尽管儿科特异性证据有限。本系统综述的目的是评估picu中PD的药物治疗的有效性和安全性。方法:按照系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南的首选报告项目(国际前瞻性系统评价注册[PROSPERO]: CRD42024504618),检索PubMed、Embase、Scopus、CINAHL、Cochrane和Web of Science数据库,检索截至2024年2月发表的研究。符合条件的研究包括1个月-18岁的儿童,在PICU诊断患有PD,使用有效的量表或精神病学评估并接受药物治疗。结果包括谵妄的改善或缓解和安全性。采用非随机干预研究的偏倚风险(ROBINS-I)量表评估偏倚风险。结果:在7309项记录中,10项涉及283例接受药物治疗的患者的研究符合纳入标准。除一项研究外,所有研究均为回顾性研究,未发现随机对照试验(rct)。对283例患者进行药物治疗,使用最多的药物是喹硫平(36%)、利培酮(20%)、氟哌啶醇(20%)和奥氮平(11%)。7项研究报告了不同的疗效,其中奥氮平在一项研究中显示了显著的症状改善(奥氮平:N = 31;对照组:N = 28; F(1,20) = 28.62, r = 0.77, 95%可信区间[CI] = 0.50-0.90),其他药物报告了谵妄严重程度改善的趋势。在整个研究中,不良事件的测量和报告不一致:报告了22例,其中QTc延长(11例)和肌张力障碍(7例)是最常见的。氟哌啶醇组观察到肌张力障碍,而喹硫平或利培酮组QTc延长。21/22例事件完全解决,发生在剂量调整或治疗中断后。结论:PICU患者PD的药物干预效果不一,少数患者出现不良事件。有限的样本量、仅有的中等质量的研究,以及缺乏可重复性,都妨碍了对药物疗效的明确结论。此外,氟哌啶醇、利培酮和喹硫平引起了一些安全问题。需要进一步的研究来为PICU中PD的药物治疗提供更有力的证据,并根据谵妄亚型确定具体的治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric Drugs
Pediatric Drugs PEDIATRICS-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Drugs promotes the optimization and advancement of all aspects of pharmacotherapy for healthcare professionals interested in pediatric drug therapy (including vaccines). The program of review and original research articles provides healthcare decision makers with clinically applicable knowledge on issues relevant to drug therapy in all areas of neonatology and the care of children and adolescents. The Journal includes: -overviews of contentious or emerging issues. -comprehensive narrative reviews of topics relating to the effective and safe management of drug therapy through all stages of pediatric development. -practical reviews covering optimum drug management of specific clinical situations. -systematic reviews that collate empirical evidence to answer a specific research question, using explicit, systematic methods as outlined by the PRISMA statement. -Adis Drug Reviews of the properties and place in therapy of both newer and established drugs in the pediatric population. -original research articles reporting the results of well-designed studies with a strong link to clinical practice, such as clinical pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic studies, clinical trials, meta-analyses, outcomes research, and pharmacoeconomic and pharmacoepidemiological studies. Additional digital features (including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations) can be published with articles; these are designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. In addition, articles published in Pediatric Drugs may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge of, but not in-depth expertise in, the area to understand important medical advances.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信