Individual Preference for Fecal Immunochemical Test Options among Younger Adults: A Discrete Choice Experiment.

IF 2.1 Q2 ECONOMICS
Kailu Wang, Ho-Man Shum, Carrie Ho-Kwan Yam, Shangfeng Tang, Chunyan Li, Yushan Wu, Eliza Lai-Yi Wong, Eng-Kiong Yeoh
{"title":"Individual Preference for Fecal Immunochemical Test Options among Younger Adults: A Discrete Choice Experiment.","authors":"Kailu Wang, Ho-Man Shum, Carrie Ho-Kwan Yam, Shangfeng Tang, Chunyan Li, Yushan Wu, Eliza Lai-Yi Wong, Eng-Kiong Yeoh","doi":"10.1007/s41669-025-00598-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to quantify the preference of adults below 50 years of age for fecal immunochemical test (FIT) options as screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) and its disparities across different subgroups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was conducted among adults aged < 50 years old in Hong Kong. A mixed logit model and latent class model were used to estimate their preference, taking into account their preference heterogeneity. Marginal willingness-to-pay for changes in the attribute levels was also estimated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 408 participants with valid responses were included for analysis. The outcomes showed 5.2% of participants would consistently reject all the 20 FIT alternatives presented to them in the DCE survey. Mortality reduction in FIT programs was deemed as the most important attribute, followed by testing frequency, early detection likelihood, familiar physician, and reduction of false positive rate. The FIT acceptance was sensitive to the change of out-of-pocket payment amount. The latent class model showed participants with different ages, educational level, and self-reported health status would have different preferences for FIT attribute levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study showed that most adults below 50 years old would be willing to consider receiving FIT if suitable testing options are available. They are more sensitive to changes in mortality reduction than changes in CRC early detection likelihood, suggesting the former is more important in information dissemination. The impact of out-of-pocket payments for FIT on its acceptance suggests that the introduction of financial subsidies can be considered to improve screening acceptance. The preference heterogeneity highlights the importance of healthcare professionals' understanding of people's values and preferences for decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":19770,"journal":{"name":"PharmacoEconomics Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PharmacoEconomics Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41669-025-00598-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to quantify the preference of adults below 50 years of age for fecal immunochemical test (FIT) options as screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) and its disparities across different subgroups.

Methods: A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was conducted among adults aged < 50 years old in Hong Kong. A mixed logit model and latent class model were used to estimate their preference, taking into account their preference heterogeneity. Marginal willingness-to-pay for changes in the attribute levels was also estimated.

Results: A total of 408 participants with valid responses were included for analysis. The outcomes showed 5.2% of participants would consistently reject all the 20 FIT alternatives presented to them in the DCE survey. Mortality reduction in FIT programs was deemed as the most important attribute, followed by testing frequency, early detection likelihood, familiar physician, and reduction of false positive rate. The FIT acceptance was sensitive to the change of out-of-pocket payment amount. The latent class model showed participants with different ages, educational level, and self-reported health status would have different preferences for FIT attribute levels.

Conclusions: The study showed that most adults below 50 years old would be willing to consider receiving FIT if suitable testing options are available. They are more sensitive to changes in mortality reduction than changes in CRC early detection likelihood, suggesting the former is more important in information dissemination. The impact of out-of-pocket payments for FIT on its acceptance suggests that the introduction of financial subsidies can be considered to improve screening acceptance. The preference heterogeneity highlights the importance of healthcare professionals' understanding of people's values and preferences for decision-making.

年轻人对粪便免疫化学测试选择的个体偏好:一个离散选择实验。
目的:本研究旨在量化50岁以下成年人对粪便免疫化学试验(FIT)作为结直肠癌(CRC)筛查的偏好及其在不同亚组之间的差异。方法:采用离散选择实验(DCE)对香港50岁以下的成年人进行调查。考虑到他们的偏好异质性,使用混合logit模型和潜在类别模型来估计他们的偏好。对属性水平变化的边际支付意愿也进行了估计。结果:共纳入408名有效应答者进行分析。结果显示,5.2%的参与者在DCE调查中始终拒绝所有20种FIT替代方案。FIT项目的死亡率降低被认为是最重要的属性,其次是检测频率、早期发现可能性、熟悉的医生和降低假阳性率。FIT接受对自付金额的变化较为敏感。潜在类别模型显示,不同年龄、教育程度和自我报告健康状况的被试对FIT属性水平有不同的偏好。结论:该研究表明,如果有合适的测试选择,大多数50岁以下的成年人愿意考虑接受FIT。他们对死亡率降低的变化比CRC早期发现可能性的变化更敏感,表明前者在信息传播中更重要。自付FIT费用对其接受程度的影响表明,可以考虑引入财政补贴,以提高筛查的接受程度。偏好异质性突出了医疗保健专业人员对人们的价值观和决策偏好的理解的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: PharmacoEconomics - Open focuses on applied research on the economic implications and health outcomes associated with drugs, devices and other healthcare interventions. The journal includes, but is not limited to, the following research areas:Economic analysis of healthcare interventionsHealth outcomes researchCost-of-illness studiesQuality-of-life studiesAdditional digital features (including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations) can be published with articles; these are designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. In addition, articles published in PharmacoEconomics -Open may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge of, but not in-depth expertise in, the area to understand important medical advances.All manuscripts are subject to peer review by international experts. Letters to the Editor are welcomed and will be considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信