Huw Summers, Nils Swindell, Chelsea Starbuck, Gareth Stratton
{"title":"The Intensity Inequality Index for Physical Activity: A New Metric for Integrative Analysis of Movement.","authors":"Huw Summers, Nils Swindell, Chelsea Starbuck, Gareth Stratton","doi":"10.1123/jpah.2025-0127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Wearable sensors recording acceleration provide a powerful tool for analysis of physical activity (PA). Continuous, high-rate data acquisition over extended periods gives highly resolved measurement of movement intensity. While increased complexity of PA analytics allows for deeper insight, it brings a challenge to statistical testing, where commonly used approaches require a single defining metric for PA per participant.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We adapt an econometric measure to obtain a statistical test metric for movement intensity-the intensity inequality index, I≠. This is a \"Gini coefficient for movement\" that quantifies the inequality in distribution of time spent across a range of activity intensity values. The I≠ metric is calculated using a graphical method on plots of cumulative time versus cumulative intensity level. Hypothesis testing of I≠ is performed on 24-hour activity traces of 58 children, aged 7-11 years, to assess statistical differences in PA between typically developing children and those suspected of having developmental coordination disorder.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The I≠ test metric provided high statistical confidence with low sample numbers: P < .05 for n ≥ 30. When differentiating between groups, I≠ halved the sample size required for a statistical power of 80% at α = .05, in comparison to the alternative metrics of intensity gradient or log ratio of minutes at low and moderate to high intensity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The inequality index provides a metric that is based on the accumulated time-counts across an activity intensity distribution. This integrative description of the distribution makes it a powerful statistical metric for PA.</p>","PeriodicalId":16812,"journal":{"name":"Journal of physical activity & health","volume":" ","pages":"1322-1331"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of physical activity & health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2025-0127","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Wearable sensors recording acceleration provide a powerful tool for analysis of physical activity (PA). Continuous, high-rate data acquisition over extended periods gives highly resolved measurement of movement intensity. While increased complexity of PA analytics allows for deeper insight, it brings a challenge to statistical testing, where commonly used approaches require a single defining metric for PA per participant.
Methods: We adapt an econometric measure to obtain a statistical test metric for movement intensity-the intensity inequality index, I≠. This is a "Gini coefficient for movement" that quantifies the inequality in distribution of time spent across a range of activity intensity values. The I≠ metric is calculated using a graphical method on plots of cumulative time versus cumulative intensity level. Hypothesis testing of I≠ is performed on 24-hour activity traces of 58 children, aged 7-11 years, to assess statistical differences in PA between typically developing children and those suspected of having developmental coordination disorder.
Results: The I≠ test metric provided high statistical confidence with low sample numbers: P < .05 for n ≥ 30. When differentiating between groups, I≠ halved the sample size required for a statistical power of 80% at α = .05, in comparison to the alternative metrics of intensity gradient or log ratio of minutes at low and moderate to high intensity.
Conclusions: The inequality index provides a metric that is based on the accumulated time-counts across an activity intensity distribution. This integrative description of the distribution makes it a powerful statistical metric for PA.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Physical Activity and Health (JPAH) publishes original research and review papers examining the relationship between physical activity and health, studying physical activity as an exposure as well as an outcome. As an exposure, the journal publishes articles examining how physical activity influences all aspects of health. As an outcome, the journal invites papers that examine the behavioral, community, and environmental interventions that may affect physical activity on an individual and/or population basis. The JPAH is an interdisciplinary journal published for researchers in fields of chronic disease.