Trends in XTAMPZA ER and other oxycodone misuse and abuse during COVID-19: A mosaic approach.

Q3 Medicine
Jennifer S Jewell, Kari M Rockhill, Hannah Burkett, Joshua C Black, Matthew S Ellis, Richard Dart
{"title":"Trends in XTAMPZA ER and other oxycodone misuse and abuse during COVID-19: A mosaic approach.","authors":"Jennifer S Jewell, Kari M Rockhill, Hannah Burkett, Joshua C Black, Matthew S Ellis, Richard Dart","doi":"10.5055/jom.0927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite efforts to reduce abuse, opioids remain a societal concern. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) brought new challenges, and research is needed to understand its impact on opioid abuse in the population. Three data sources were used to investigate trends in misuse and abuse of XTAMPZA® ER compared to extended-release (ER) and single-entity immediate-release (SE-IR) oxycodone from 2019Q3 through 2022. Changes in trends over 6-month intervals were investigated using linear spline models with a breakpoint at 2020Q3 to measure the impact of COVID-19. Poison center call rates for misuse or abuse of ER and SE-IR oxycodone showed significant changes during COVID-19 (both p < 0.001), reversing trends and significantly decreasing (201327.56 percent change and -12.91 percent change, respectively). In contrast, XTAMPZA ER trend rates showed no change during COVID-19, remaining fairly stable. The odds of abuse of ER oxycodone among those entering opioid use disorder treatment significantly changed during COVID-19 (p = 0.025), resulting in a stabilization of the trend. For SE-IR oxycodone, no change was observed in the decreasing trend (-12.88 percent change during COVID-19). XTAMPZA ER had no significant change during COVID-19 (p = 0.200) and appeared stable. Since 2021Q3, among the general adult population, the prevalence of past-year nonmedical use of XTAMPZA ER was rare (0.04 percent), as was the case for other oxycodone products (<1 percent). Overall, there is no evidence that oxycodone misuse and abuse worsened during COVID-19 in these populations, and XTAMPZA ER was consistently lower than other oxycodone products. Low rates and improving trends in oxycodone misuse and abuse may signify an ongoing reduction in prescription opioid contributions to the opioid crisis.</p>","PeriodicalId":16601,"journal":{"name":"Journal of opioid management","volume":"21 3","pages":"249-259"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of opioid management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5055/jom.0927","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite efforts to reduce abuse, opioids remain a societal concern. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) brought new challenges, and research is needed to understand its impact on opioid abuse in the population. Three data sources were used to investigate trends in misuse and abuse of XTAMPZA® ER compared to extended-release (ER) and single-entity immediate-release (SE-IR) oxycodone from 2019Q3 through 2022. Changes in trends over 6-month intervals were investigated using linear spline models with a breakpoint at 2020Q3 to measure the impact of COVID-19. Poison center call rates for misuse or abuse of ER and SE-IR oxycodone showed significant changes during COVID-19 (both p < 0.001), reversing trends and significantly decreasing (201327.56 percent change and -12.91 percent change, respectively). In contrast, XTAMPZA ER trend rates showed no change during COVID-19, remaining fairly stable. The odds of abuse of ER oxycodone among those entering opioid use disorder treatment significantly changed during COVID-19 (p = 0.025), resulting in a stabilization of the trend. For SE-IR oxycodone, no change was observed in the decreasing trend (-12.88 percent change during COVID-19). XTAMPZA ER had no significant change during COVID-19 (p = 0.200) and appeared stable. Since 2021Q3, among the general adult population, the prevalence of past-year nonmedical use of XTAMPZA ER was rare (0.04 percent), as was the case for other oxycodone products (<1 percent). Overall, there is no evidence that oxycodone misuse and abuse worsened during COVID-19 in these populations, and XTAMPZA ER was consistently lower than other oxycodone products. Low rates and improving trends in oxycodone misuse and abuse may signify an ongoing reduction in prescription opioid contributions to the opioid crisis.

COVID-19期间XTAMPZA ER和其他羟考酮误用和滥用的趋势:马赛克方法。
尽管努力减少滥用,阿片类药物仍然是一个社会问题。2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)带来了新的挑战,需要进行研究,以了解其对人群中阿片类药物滥用的影响。使用三个数据源调查了XTAMPZA®ER与缓释(ER)和单实体速释(SE-IR)羟考酮相比在2019年第三季度至2022年期间的误用和滥用趋势。使用线性样条模型研究了6个月间隔的趋势变化,断点为2020Q3,以测量COVID-19的影响。误用或滥用ER和SE-IR羟考酮的中毒中心呼叫率在COVID-19期间发生了显著变化(p均< 0.001),逆转趋势并显著下降(分别变化了201327.56%和- 12.91%)。相比之下,XTAMPZA ER趋势率在COVID-19期间没有变化,保持相当稳定。在接受阿片类药物使用障碍治疗的患者中,ER羟考酮滥用的几率在COVID-19期间显著改变(p = 0.025),导致趋势稳定。SE-IR羟考酮的下降趋势无变化(新冠肺炎期间下降- 12.88%)。XTAMPZA ER在COVID-19期间无显著变化(p = 0.200),表现稳定。自2021Q3以来,在普通成人人群中,过去一年非医疗使用XTAMPZA ER的流行率很少见(0.04%),其他羟考酮产品的情况也是如此(
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of opioid management
Journal of opioid management Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: The Journal of Opioid Management deals with all aspects of opioids. From basic science, pre-clinical, clinical, abuse, compliance and addiction medicine, the journal provides and unbiased forum for researchers and clinicians to explore and manage the complexities of opioid prescription.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信