Network Meta-analysis of 1.5% Ruxolitinib Cream Versus Systemic Agents in the Treatment of Moderate Atopic Dermatitis.

IF 4.2 3区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY
Melinda J Gooderham, H Chih-Ho Hong, Di Wang, Becky Hooper, Avery Hughes-Martin, Heather Cameron, Laura Pastor, Alicia Pepper, Ping Wu, Ali Mojebi, Grace Wong, Rafael Marino, Marie-Lise Dion, Mehdi Larbi
{"title":"Network Meta-analysis of 1.5% Ruxolitinib Cream Versus Systemic Agents in the Treatment of Moderate Atopic Dermatitis.","authors":"Melinda J Gooderham, H Chih-Ho Hong, Di Wang, Becky Hooper, Avery Hughes-Martin, Heather Cameron, Laura Pastor, Alicia Pepper, Ping Wu, Ali Mojebi, Grace Wong, Rafael Marino, Marie-Lise Dion, Mehdi Larbi","doi":"10.1007/s13555-025-01503-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, highly pruritic, relapsing inflammatory disease associated with high quality-of-life burden. Topical 1.5% ruxolitinib cream is a selective Janus kinase (JAK)1/JAK2 inhibitor that is well tolerated and effective in improving itch and lesion clearance in patients ≥ 12 years old. This analysis estimates comparative efficacy for 1.5% ruxolitinib cream relative to systemic therapies for treatment of patients ≥ 12 years with AD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature review (SLR) identified randomized controlled trials evaluating 1.5% ruxolitinib cream, oral JAK inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors, and systemic immunosuppressants. A feasibility assessment evaluated whether indirect treatment comparison (ITC) was appropriate and determined appropriate ITC methods. This network meta-analysis (NMA) assessed the comparative efficacy of 1.5% ruxolitinib cream against systemic therapies in a \"systemic-eligible moderate AD\" subgroup defined as ≥ 12 years old and eligible for topical and systemic therapies (Investigator's Global Assessment [IGA] = 3, Eczema Area and Severity Index [EASI] ≥ 16, and body surface area ≥ 10%); an ITC with the full study populations was not feasible. A frequentist framework using a penalized likelihood NMA included outcomes of IGA 0/1 with at least a 2-point improvement from baseline, EASI-75, and Itch Numerical Rating Scale 4 (NRS4).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SLR identified 25 studies, of which 12 reported outcomes for the relevant subgroup for four interventions: 1.5% ruxolitinib cream, dupilumab 300 mg, upadacitinib (15 mg, 30 mg), and abrocitinib (100 mg, 200 mg), which were compared against placebo or placebo + topical corticosteroids. There were no statistically significant differences between active comparators for IGA 0/1, EASI-75, and Itch NRS4, although point estimates numerically favored 1.5% ruxolitinib cream for IGA 0/1 and EASI‑75.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For patients with moderate AD who are eligible for systemic therapies, 1.5% ruxolitinib cream might provide disease control comparable to systemic treatments, such as dupilumab, regarding IGA 0/1, EASI-75, and Itch NRS4.</p>","PeriodicalId":11186,"journal":{"name":"Dermatology and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatology and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13555-025-01503-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, highly pruritic, relapsing inflammatory disease associated with high quality-of-life burden. Topical 1.5% ruxolitinib cream is a selective Janus kinase (JAK)1/JAK2 inhibitor that is well tolerated and effective in improving itch and lesion clearance in patients ≥ 12 years old. This analysis estimates comparative efficacy for 1.5% ruxolitinib cream relative to systemic therapies for treatment of patients ≥ 12 years with AD.

Methods: A systematic literature review (SLR) identified randomized controlled trials evaluating 1.5% ruxolitinib cream, oral JAK inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors, and systemic immunosuppressants. A feasibility assessment evaluated whether indirect treatment comparison (ITC) was appropriate and determined appropriate ITC methods. This network meta-analysis (NMA) assessed the comparative efficacy of 1.5% ruxolitinib cream against systemic therapies in a "systemic-eligible moderate AD" subgroup defined as ≥ 12 years old and eligible for topical and systemic therapies (Investigator's Global Assessment [IGA] = 3, Eczema Area and Severity Index [EASI] ≥ 16, and body surface area ≥ 10%); an ITC with the full study populations was not feasible. A frequentist framework using a penalized likelihood NMA included outcomes of IGA 0/1 with at least a 2-point improvement from baseline, EASI-75, and Itch Numerical Rating Scale 4 (NRS4).

Results: The SLR identified 25 studies, of which 12 reported outcomes for the relevant subgroup for four interventions: 1.5% ruxolitinib cream, dupilumab 300 mg, upadacitinib (15 mg, 30 mg), and abrocitinib (100 mg, 200 mg), which were compared against placebo or placebo + topical corticosteroids. There were no statistically significant differences between active comparators for IGA 0/1, EASI-75, and Itch NRS4, although point estimates numerically favored 1.5% ruxolitinib cream for IGA 0/1 and EASI‑75.

Conclusion: For patients with moderate AD who are eligible for systemic therapies, 1.5% ruxolitinib cream might provide disease control comparable to systemic treatments, such as dupilumab, regarding IGA 0/1, EASI-75, and Itch NRS4.

1.5% Ruxolitinib乳膏与全身药物治疗中度特应性皮炎的网络meta分析。
特应性皮炎(AD)是一种慢性、高度瘙痒性、复发性炎症性疾病,与高生活质量负担相关。外用1.5% ruxolitinib乳膏是一种选择性Janus激酶(JAK)1/JAK2抑制剂,耐受性良好,可有效改善≥12岁患者的瘙痒和病变清除。该分析估计1.5% ruxolitinib乳膏相对于全身疗法治疗≥12年AD患者的比较疗效。方法:系统文献综述(SLR)纳入随机对照试验,评估1.5%鲁索利替尼乳膏、口服JAK抑制剂、单克隆抗体、磷酸二酯酶4抑制剂和全身免疫抑制剂。可行性评估评估了间接处理比较(ITC)是否合适,并确定了适当的ITC方法。该网络荟萃分析(NMA)评估了1.5% ruxolitinib乳膏对“符合全身条件的中度AD”亚组的比较疗效,该亚组定义为≥12岁,适合局部和全身治疗(研究者的整体评估[IGA] = 3,湿疹面积和严重程度指数[EASI]≥16,体表面积≥10%);纳入全部研究人群的ITC是不可行的。使用惩罚可能性NMA的频率学家框架包括IGA 0/1的结果,至少比基线改善2分,EASI-75和瘙痒数值评定量表4 (NRS4)。结果:SLR确定了25项研究,其中12项报告了四种干预措施的相关亚组结果:1.5% ruxolitinib霜,dupilumab 300 mg, upadacitinib (15 mg, 30 mg)和abrocitinib (100 mg, 200 mg),与安慰剂或安慰剂+局部皮质类固醇进行比较。IGA 0/1、EASI-75和Itch NRS4的活性比较物之间没有统计学上的显著差异,尽管对IGA 0/1和EASI-75的点估计在数值上倾向于1.5% ruxolitinib乳膏。结论:对于符合全身治疗条件的中度AD患者,1.5% ruxolitinib乳膏可能提供与全身治疗(如dupilumab)相当的疾病控制,关于IGA 0/1, EASI-75和Itch NRS4。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dermatology and Therapy
Dermatology and Therapy Medicine-Dermatology
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
8.80%
发文量
187
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Dermatology and Therapy is an international, open access, peer-reviewed, rapid publication journal (peer review in 2 weeks, published 3–4 weeks from acceptance). The journal is dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of dermatological therapies. Studies relating to diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health and epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged. Areas of focus include, but are not limited to all clinical aspects of dermatology, such as skin pharmacology; skin development and aging; prevention, diagnosis, and management of skin disorders and melanomas; research into dermal structures and pathology; and all areas of aesthetic dermatology, including skin maintenance, dermatological surgery, and lasers. The journal is of interest to a broad audience of pharmaceutical and healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, case reports/case series, trial protocols, and short communications. Dermatology and Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an International and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of quality research, which may be considered of insufficient interest by other journals. The journal appeals to a global audience and receives submissions from all over the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信