Real-World Polypharmacy and Drug-Drug Interactions in a Large Cohort of Direct Oral Anticoagulant Users With Atrial Fibrillation.

IF 3.6 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Veronica De Angelis, Ylenia Ingrasciotta, Maria Carelli, Alberto Spadotto, Martina Amadori, Claudia Pagliaro, Annalisa Di Giorgio, Valentina Isgrò, Saveria Serena Foti, Michele Tari, Igor Diemberger
{"title":"Real-World Polypharmacy and Drug-Drug Interactions in a Large Cohort of Direct Oral Anticoagulant Users With Atrial Fibrillation.","authors":"Veronica De Angelis, Ylenia Ingrasciotta, Maria Carelli, Alberto Spadotto, Martina Amadori, Claudia Pagliaro, Annalisa Di Giorgio, Valentina Isgrò, Saveria Serena Foti, Michele Tari, Igor Diemberger","doi":"10.1016/j.clinthera.2025.08.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Despite their promising safety profile, use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) presents challenges, particularly concerning polypharmacy and potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs). This study aimed to investigate real-world effects of polypharmacy and DDIs among DOAC users, focusing on patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using administrative health care data from the Caserta Local Health Unit (2012-2020). Incident DOAC users were categorized by type of anticoagulant (apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and edoxaban). Polypharmacy and DDIs were analyzed before and after index date (ID), stratifying results by DOAC and therapeutic indication. The impact of DDIs on safety outcomes, particularly bleeding risk, was assessed. Bleeding outcomes were evaluated within 1 year after ID by multivariate regression models.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Among 16,367 incident DOAC users, 68.9% were treated for AF. The number of interacting drugs increased in 55.2% of patients, with a higher prevalence of 3+ interacting drugs in low-dose users (35% vs 29.2% in high-dose users; P < 0.05). Before ID, 35.6% of the overall cohort had 0 interacting drugs compared with 15.2% after ID. Dabigatran users had the highest increase in interacting drugs (61.8%) compared with anti-Xa agents (56%). Patients with 6+ interacting drugs exhibited a 2.5% incidence of major bleeding after ID. Dabigatran use and low-dose DOAC regimens were independently associated with increased bleeding risks.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Polypharmacy and DDIs are prevalent among real-world DOAC users, particularly in patients with AF. The observed association between DDIs and bleeding risk underscores the importance of personalized medication management strategies and routine DDI evaluations to optimize DOAC safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":10699,"journal":{"name":"Clinical therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2025.08.007","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Despite their promising safety profile, use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) presents challenges, particularly concerning polypharmacy and potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs). This study aimed to investigate real-world effects of polypharmacy and DDIs among DOAC users, focusing on patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).

Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using administrative health care data from the Caserta Local Health Unit (2012-2020). Incident DOAC users were categorized by type of anticoagulant (apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and edoxaban). Polypharmacy and DDIs were analyzed before and after index date (ID), stratifying results by DOAC and therapeutic indication. The impact of DDIs on safety outcomes, particularly bleeding risk, was assessed. Bleeding outcomes were evaluated within 1 year after ID by multivariate regression models.

Findings: Among 16,367 incident DOAC users, 68.9% were treated for AF. The number of interacting drugs increased in 55.2% of patients, with a higher prevalence of 3+ interacting drugs in low-dose users (35% vs 29.2% in high-dose users; P < 0.05). Before ID, 35.6% of the overall cohort had 0 interacting drugs compared with 15.2% after ID. Dabigatran users had the highest increase in interacting drugs (61.8%) compared with anti-Xa agents (56%). Patients with 6+ interacting drugs exhibited a 2.5% incidence of major bleeding after ID. Dabigatran use and low-dose DOAC regimens were independently associated with increased bleeding risks.

Implications: Polypharmacy and DDIs are prevalent among real-world DOAC users, particularly in patients with AF. The observed association between DDIs and bleeding risk underscores the importance of personalized medication management strategies and routine DDI evaluations to optimize DOAC safety.

心房颤动患者直接口服抗凝剂的大队列中真实世界的多重用药和药物相互作用。
目的:尽管直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)具有良好的安全性,但其使用存在挑战,特别是涉及多药和潜在的药物-药物相互作用(ddi)。本研究旨在探讨多药联用和ddi对DOAC使用者的实际影响,重点是房颤(AF)患者。方法:回顾性队列分析使用卡塞塔地方卫生单位(2012-2020)的行政卫生保健数据。事件DOAC使用者按抗凝剂类型(阿哌沙班、达比加群、利伐沙班和依多沙班)进行分类。多药组和ddi组在指标日期(ID)前后进行分析,并按DOAC和治疗指征对结果进行分层。评估了ddi对安全性结果的影响,特别是出血风险。通过多变量回归模型评估ID后1年内的出血结果。结果:在16367例DOAC使用者中,68.9%的患者接受了房颤治疗,55.2%的患者出现了相互作用药物的数量增加,其中低剂量使用者出现3+相互作用药物的发生率更高(35% vs 29.2%; P < 0.05)。在ID之前,35.6%的人没有相互作用的药物,而ID之后这一比例为15.2%。与抗xa药物(56%)相比,达比加群使用者的相互作用药物增加最多(61.8%)。6种以上相互作用药物的患者ID后大出血发生率为2.5%。使用达比加群和低剂量DOAC方案与出血风险增加独立相关。意义:多重用药和DDI在DOAC使用者中普遍存在,尤其是房颤患者。观察到的DDI与出血风险之间的关联强调了个性化用药管理策略和常规DDI评估对优化DOAC安全性的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical therapeutics
Clinical therapeutics 医学-药学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.10%
发文量
154
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Therapeutics provides peer-reviewed, rapid publication of recent developments in drug and other therapies as well as in diagnostics, pharmacoeconomics, health policy, treatment outcomes, and innovations in drug and biologics research. In addition Clinical Therapeutics features updates on specific topics collated by expert Topic Editors. Clinical Therapeutics is read by a large international audience of scientists and clinicians in a variety of research, academic, and clinical practice settings. Articles are indexed by all major biomedical abstracting databases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信