Understanding Access and Treatment Challenges in Multiple Myeloma

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
C. Iwuagwu , B. Dhakal , J. Thompson , J. Cook
{"title":"Understanding Access and Treatment Challenges in Multiple Myeloma","authors":"C. Iwuagwu ,&nbsp;B. Dhakal ,&nbsp;J. Thompson ,&nbsp;J. Cook","doi":"10.1016/j.jnma.2025.08.090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Multiple myeloma patients face complex barriers to diagnosis, care access, support, and navigation. This study analyzes patient-reported experiences to identify structural gaps and cluster patients into meaningful segments based on their needs and perceptions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We administered a 48-item anonymous survey to adult myeloma patients at the Medical College of Wisconsin and through national platforms, including the International Myeloma Foundation, Leukemia &amp; Lymphoma Society, and Facebook groups. The survey assessed demographics, treatment experiences, delays, perceived personalization, and barriers to care. We used JMP 17 for analysis and Julius.AI for visualization. Rule based segmentation of structured responses was used to identify distinct patient personas. Chi-square tests assessed associations, with p &lt; 0.05 considered significant. The study was IRB-approved.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 320 participants responded between April 25 and June 5, 2025; 289 (90.3%) completed the survey in full. The cohort was predominantly older (55.7%, n=170/305 between 60-75), White (79.3%, n=241/304), female (58.9%, n=179/304), highly educated (89.5%, n=272/304), and suburban (52.5%, n=159/303). Modal insurance types were Medicare (37.8%) or private insurance (30.9%); 11.2% both. Most (69.7%) reported a smooth treatment start; delays were primarily due to insurance/cost (4%).</div><div>Using rule-based segmentation of structured responses, we identified three distinct patient personas: (1) <em>Empowered but Unsupported</em> (n=56; 17.5%) who indicated no emotional support barriers, less interest in navigators, but frequent reports of unmet needs such as poor communication. (2) <em>Engaged and Informed</em> (n=105; 32.8%): Highly motivated patients who requested personalized care, clinical trial transparency, or insurance navigation and (3) <em>Delayed and Discouraged</em> (n=35; 10.9%) who reported lower support, diagnostic delays, and a strong perception of race-related disparities. Unclassifiable personas (n=124) were due to missing or neutral responses. There was no difference in self-identified race across the personas (p = 0.08), but 100% of the <em>Delayed/ Discouraged</em> group believed race played a role in care, compared with 44% of the <em>Engaged/Informed</em> and 21.4% of the <em>Empowered/Unsupported</em> (p &lt; 0.001). Minoritized patients (86.7% Black, 100% other minoritized) were more likely to perceive race as a factor (p = 0.0024). <em>Empowered/Unsupported</em> patients were significantly more likely to request better communication (100%) and empathy (53.6%), while <em>Engaged and Informed</em> patients prioritized clinical trial access (61%). None of the <em>Delayed and Discouraged</em> patients made this request (p &lt; 0.0001). Black respondents most frequently expressed the need for greater empathy (53.7%; p = 0.0012). Those &lt;60 (40.2%, n=33) were more likely to express interest in clinical trials (p=0.03), this interest did not vary by race (p=0.36). Interest in patient navigation did not significantly differ by education level (p = 0.3), suggesting that even highly educated patients may struggle with treatment complexity. Most patients felt their care was personalized (71.1% 207/291), with no differences by race (p = 0.55), but perceptions varied by persona with only 39.1% of <em>Engaged/Informed</em> patients felt their treatment was always tailored, vs. 61.8% of <em>Empowered/Unsupported</em> and 88.6% <em>of Delayed/Discouraged</em> (p &lt; 0.0001), contrasting patients’ expectations with the actual delivery of care.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Patient-reported experiences reveal distinct personas with differing needs, perceptions and expectations of care. While most patients reported smooth treatment transitions and felt their care was personalized, gaps persist particularly among highly engaged patients who report unmet expectations around communication, personalization, and trial access. Perceptions of racial disparities persist, especially among minoritized groups illuminating the unequal experiences of patients within the myeloma care landscape. These findings stress the importance of segmenting care approaches to align with patient identity, complexity, and support needs in multiple myeloma.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17369,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Medical Association","volume":"117 1","pages":"Pages 49-50"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002796842500286X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Multiple myeloma patients face complex barriers to diagnosis, care access, support, and navigation. This study analyzes patient-reported experiences to identify structural gaps and cluster patients into meaningful segments based on their needs and perceptions.

Methods

We administered a 48-item anonymous survey to adult myeloma patients at the Medical College of Wisconsin and through national platforms, including the International Myeloma Foundation, Leukemia & Lymphoma Society, and Facebook groups. The survey assessed demographics, treatment experiences, delays, perceived personalization, and barriers to care. We used JMP 17 for analysis and Julius.AI for visualization. Rule based segmentation of structured responses was used to identify distinct patient personas. Chi-square tests assessed associations, with p < 0.05 considered significant. The study was IRB-approved.

Results

A total of 320 participants responded between April 25 and June 5, 2025; 289 (90.3%) completed the survey in full. The cohort was predominantly older (55.7%, n=170/305 between 60-75), White (79.3%, n=241/304), female (58.9%, n=179/304), highly educated (89.5%, n=272/304), and suburban (52.5%, n=159/303). Modal insurance types were Medicare (37.8%) or private insurance (30.9%); 11.2% both. Most (69.7%) reported a smooth treatment start; delays were primarily due to insurance/cost (4%).
Using rule-based segmentation of structured responses, we identified three distinct patient personas: (1) Empowered but Unsupported (n=56; 17.5%) who indicated no emotional support barriers, less interest in navigators, but frequent reports of unmet needs such as poor communication. (2) Engaged and Informed (n=105; 32.8%): Highly motivated patients who requested personalized care, clinical trial transparency, or insurance navigation and (3) Delayed and Discouraged (n=35; 10.9%) who reported lower support, diagnostic delays, and a strong perception of race-related disparities. Unclassifiable personas (n=124) were due to missing or neutral responses. There was no difference in self-identified race across the personas (p = 0.08), but 100% of the Delayed/ Discouraged group believed race played a role in care, compared with 44% of the Engaged/Informed and 21.4% of the Empowered/Unsupported (p < 0.001). Minoritized patients (86.7% Black, 100% other minoritized) were more likely to perceive race as a factor (p = 0.0024). Empowered/Unsupported patients were significantly more likely to request better communication (100%) and empathy (53.6%), while Engaged and Informed patients prioritized clinical trial access (61%). None of the Delayed and Discouraged patients made this request (p < 0.0001). Black respondents most frequently expressed the need for greater empathy (53.7%; p = 0.0012). Those <60 (40.2%, n=33) were more likely to express interest in clinical trials (p=0.03), this interest did not vary by race (p=0.36). Interest in patient navigation did not significantly differ by education level (p = 0.3), suggesting that even highly educated patients may struggle with treatment complexity. Most patients felt their care was personalized (71.1% 207/291), with no differences by race (p = 0.55), but perceptions varied by persona with only 39.1% of Engaged/Informed patients felt their treatment was always tailored, vs. 61.8% of Empowered/Unsupported and 88.6% of Delayed/Discouraged (p < 0.0001), contrasting patients’ expectations with the actual delivery of care.

Conclusion

Patient-reported experiences reveal distinct personas with differing needs, perceptions and expectations of care. While most patients reported smooth treatment transitions and felt their care was personalized, gaps persist particularly among highly engaged patients who report unmet expectations around communication, personalization, and trial access. Perceptions of racial disparities persist, especially among minoritized groups illuminating the unequal experiences of patients within the myeloma care landscape. These findings stress the importance of segmenting care approaches to align with patient identity, complexity, and support needs in multiple myeloma.
了解多发性骨髓瘤的可及性和治疗挑战
多发性骨髓瘤患者在诊断、治疗、支持和导航方面面临着复杂的障碍。本研究分析了患者报告的经验,以确定结构差距,并根据他们的需求和看法将患者分组为有意义的部分。方法:我们通过国际骨髓瘤基金会、白血病和淋巴瘤协会以及Facebook群组等全国性平台,对威斯康星医学院的成年骨髓瘤患者进行了48项匿名调查。该调查评估了人口统计、治疗经验、延误、感知个性化和护理障碍。我们用jmp17进行分析,用朱利叶斯。用于可视化的AI。基于规则的结构化反应分割用于识别不同的患者角色。卡方检验评估相关性,p <; 0.05认为显著。该研究是irb批准的。在2025年4月25日至6月5日期间,共有320名参与者参与了调查;289人(90.3%)完整填写调查问卷。研究对象主要为老年人(55.7%,n=170/305)、白人(79.3%,n=241/304)、女性(58.9%,n=179/304)、高学历(89.5%,n=272/304)和郊区(52.5%,n=159/303)。保险类型以医疗保险(37.8%)和私人保险(30.9%)为主;两11.2%。大多数(69.7%)报告治疗开始顺利;延误主要是由于保险/成本(4%)。使用基于规则的结构化响应分割,我们确定了三种不同的患者角色:(1)授权但不支持(n=56; 17.5%),他们表示没有情感支持障碍,对导航不感兴趣,但经常报告未满足的需求,如沟通不良。(2)参与和知情(n=105, 32.8%):要求个性化护理,临床试验透明度或保险导航的高度积极的患者;(3)延迟和气馁(n=35, 10.9%),报告较低的支持,诊断延迟,以及强烈的种族相关差异感知。无法分类的人物角色(n=124)是由于缺失或中立的反应。在不同的角色中,自我认同的种族没有差异(p = 0.08),但100%的延迟/气馁组认为种族在护理中起作用,而参与/知情组中有44%,授权/不支持组中有21.4% (p < 0.001)。少数族裔患者(86.7%黑人,100%其他少数族裔)更有可能将种族视为一个因素(p = 0.0024)。被授权/未被支持的患者更有可能要求更好的沟通(100%)和同理心(53.6%),而参与和知情的患者优先考虑临床试验准入(61%)。延迟和气馁的患者均未提出此要求(p < 0.0001)。黑人受访者最常表示需要更多的同理心(53.7%;p = 0.0012)。60人(40.2%,n=33)更有可能表达对临床试验的兴趣(p=0.03),这种兴趣不因种族而异(p=0.36)。对患者导航的兴趣在受教育程度上没有显著差异(p = 0.3),这表明即使是受过高等教育的患者也可能与治疗复杂性作斗争。大多数患者认为他们的护理是个性化的(71.1% 207/291),没有种族差异(p = 0.55),但看法因个人而异,只有39.1%的参与/知情患者认为他们的治疗总是量身定制的,而授权/不支持的患者为61.8%,延迟/气馁的患者为88.6% (p < 0.0001),将患者的期望与实际提供的护理进行了对比。结论患者报告的经历揭示了不同的人格,具有不同的需求,感知和期望的护理。虽然大多数患者报告治疗过渡顺利,并认为他们的护理是个性化的,但差距仍然存在,特别是在高度参与的患者中,他们报告在沟通、个性化和试验准入方面的期望未得到满足。种族差异的观念持续存在,特别是在少数民族群体中,阐明了骨髓瘤护理景观中患者的不平等经历。这些发现强调了分割治疗方法的重要性,以配合多发性骨髓瘤患者的身份,复杂性和支持需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.00%
发文量
139
审稿时长
98 days
期刊介绍: Journal of the National Medical Association, the official journal of the National Medical Association, is a peer-reviewed publication whose purpose is to address medical care disparities of persons of African descent. The Journal of the National Medical Association is focused on specialized clinical research activities related to the health problems of African Americans and other minority groups. Special emphasis is placed on the application of medical science to improve the healthcare of underserved populations both in the United States and abroad. The Journal has the following objectives: (1) to expand the base of original peer-reviewed literature and the quality of that research on the topic of minority health; (2) to provide greater dissemination of this research; (3) to offer appropriate and timely recognition of the significant contributions of physicians who serve these populations; and (4) to promote engagement by member and non-member physicians in the overall goals and objectives of the National Medical Association.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信