Spiritual Beliefs and Preferences among Patients with Multiple Myeloma

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Danielle Cain , Hannah Johnston , Michelle Ware-Ivy , Benjamin A Derman
{"title":"Spiritual Beliefs and Preferences among Patients with Multiple Myeloma","authors":"Danielle Cain ,&nbsp;Hannah Johnston ,&nbsp;Michelle Ware-Ivy ,&nbsp;Benjamin A Derman","doi":"10.1016/j.jnma.2025.08.089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Multiple myeloma is the second most common hematologic malignancy in the United States, with over 36,000 new cases annually. Despite its prevalence, little is known about the role of spirituality and religion throughout the myeloma disease course. We surveyed patients with multiple myeloma to assess their spiritual beliefs and preferences for incorporating spirituality into care.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We developed a comprehensive electronic survey incorporating validated instruments, including the Centrality of Religiosity Scale (CRS), the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being (FACIT-Sp-12), and the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Myeloma Module Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-MY20). A patient advocate reviewed all questions for clarity and cultural appropriateness. The survey was distributed anonymously via X/Twitter and the electronic health record system. Survey scores were calculated using standard instrument-specific scoring algorithms. Group comparisons were made using the Mann-Whitney U-test. Correlations between spirituality scores and QLQ-MY20 subscales were assessed using Spearman’s rank correlation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 281 respondents, 176 (63%) completed all survey components and were included in the analysis. The median age was 65 years; 64% were female and 82% were married or in a committed partnership. The cohort was predominantly Non-Hispanic (NH) White (85%), with 8.5% identifying as NH Black. Most participants identified as Christian (70%), followed by atheist/agnostic (11%), spiritual but not religious (10%), Jewish (6%), and other (3%). Among Christian patients (n=123), both catholic (n=44) and protestant (n=63) denominations were represented.</div><div>Most respondents (140/176, 80%) believed that clinicians should consider religious factors when presenting treatment recommendations, and 75 (42%) expressed interest in receiving spiritual care services or inspirational resources as part of their care plan. However, only 19% of respondents had discussed their spiritual beliefs with their care team. This interest was especially high among Black respondents (12/15, 80%) compared to non-Black respondents (p&lt;0.001).</div><div>The median FACIT-Sp-12 score was 33 and the median CRS score was 3.73. Black respondents had significantly higher FACIT-Sp-12 (37 vs 33, p=0.0085) and CRS scores (4.4 vs 3.67, p=0.0092), indicating stronger spiritual identity. Atheist/agnostic patients had significantly lower FACIT-Sp-12 (median 22.5 vs 35, p&lt;0.001) and CRS scores (median 1.33 vs 3.87, p&lt;0.001) compared to all other respondents, reflecting lower spiritual well-being and religiosity. These patients also reported lower body image scores on the QLQ-MY20 (66.67 vs 83.34, p=0.01). Spearman correlation analysis showed a weak but significant positive correlation between CRS and the QLQ-MY20 disease symptoms subscale (ρ = 0.17, p &lt; 0.05). No other significant correlations were observed between spirituality measures and QLQ-MY20 subscales.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Spirituality and religiosity vary widely among patients with multiple myeloma. Black patients reported higher levels of spiritual identity, while atheist/agnostic patients reported lower spiritual scores and diminished body image. Nearly half of respondents expressed interest in integrating spiritual care into their treatment experience, including 80% of Black patients. These findings support efforts to advance patient-centered care by incorporating spiritual care services into routine myeloma care to address patients’ diverse needs and preferences.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17369,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Medical Association","volume":"117 1","pages":"Pages 48-49"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0027968425002858","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Multiple myeloma is the second most common hematologic malignancy in the United States, with over 36,000 new cases annually. Despite its prevalence, little is known about the role of spirituality and religion throughout the myeloma disease course. We surveyed patients with multiple myeloma to assess their spiritual beliefs and preferences for incorporating spirituality into care.

Methods

We developed a comprehensive electronic survey incorporating validated instruments, including the Centrality of Religiosity Scale (CRS), the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being (FACIT-Sp-12), and the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Myeloma Module Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-MY20). A patient advocate reviewed all questions for clarity and cultural appropriateness. The survey was distributed anonymously via X/Twitter and the electronic health record system. Survey scores were calculated using standard instrument-specific scoring algorithms. Group comparisons were made using the Mann-Whitney U-test. Correlations between spirituality scores and QLQ-MY20 subscales were assessed using Spearman’s rank correlation.

Results

Of 281 respondents, 176 (63%) completed all survey components and were included in the analysis. The median age was 65 years; 64% were female and 82% were married or in a committed partnership. The cohort was predominantly Non-Hispanic (NH) White (85%), with 8.5% identifying as NH Black. Most participants identified as Christian (70%), followed by atheist/agnostic (11%), spiritual but not religious (10%), Jewish (6%), and other (3%). Among Christian patients (n=123), both catholic (n=44) and protestant (n=63) denominations were represented.
Most respondents (140/176, 80%) believed that clinicians should consider religious factors when presenting treatment recommendations, and 75 (42%) expressed interest in receiving spiritual care services or inspirational resources as part of their care plan. However, only 19% of respondents had discussed their spiritual beliefs with their care team. This interest was especially high among Black respondents (12/15, 80%) compared to non-Black respondents (p<0.001).
The median FACIT-Sp-12 score was 33 and the median CRS score was 3.73. Black respondents had significantly higher FACIT-Sp-12 (37 vs 33, p=0.0085) and CRS scores (4.4 vs 3.67, p=0.0092), indicating stronger spiritual identity. Atheist/agnostic patients had significantly lower FACIT-Sp-12 (median 22.5 vs 35, p<0.001) and CRS scores (median 1.33 vs 3.87, p<0.001) compared to all other respondents, reflecting lower spiritual well-being and religiosity. These patients also reported lower body image scores on the QLQ-MY20 (66.67 vs 83.34, p=0.01). Spearman correlation analysis showed a weak but significant positive correlation between CRS and the QLQ-MY20 disease symptoms subscale (ρ = 0.17, p < 0.05). No other significant correlations were observed between spirituality measures and QLQ-MY20 subscales.

Conclusion

Spirituality and religiosity vary widely among patients with multiple myeloma. Black patients reported higher levels of spiritual identity, while atheist/agnostic patients reported lower spiritual scores and diminished body image. Nearly half of respondents expressed interest in integrating spiritual care into their treatment experience, including 80% of Black patients. These findings support efforts to advance patient-centered care by incorporating spiritual care services into routine myeloma care to address patients’ diverse needs and preferences.
多发性骨髓瘤患者的精神信仰与偏好
多发性骨髓瘤是美国第二大最常见的血液恶性肿瘤,每年有超过36000例新病例。尽管骨髓瘤很普遍,但人们对精神和宗教在骨髓瘤病程中的作用知之甚少。我们调查了多发性骨髓瘤患者,以评估他们的精神信仰和将精神纳入护理的偏好。方法:我们开发了一个综合的电子调查,包括宗教虔诚度中心性量表(CRS)、慢性疾病治疗-精神健康功能评估(FACIT-Sp-12)和欧洲癌症骨髓瘤研究和治疗组织模块生活质量问卷(QLQ-MY20)。一名患者辩护律师审查了所有问题的清晰度和文化上的适当性。该调查通过X/Twitter和电子健康记录系统匿名分发。使用标准仪器特定评分算法计算调查分数。采用Mann-Whitney u检验进行组间比较。灵性得分与QLQ-MY20子量表之间的相关性采用Spearman等级相关进行评估。结果281名被调查者中,有176人(63%)完成了所有调查内容,并被纳入分析。年龄中位数为65岁;其中64%是女性,82%已婚或有固定伴侣。该队列主要是非西班牙裔(NH)白人(85%),其中8.5%为NH黑人。大多数参与者认为自己是基督徒(70%),其次是无神论者/不可知论者(11%),有信仰但不信教(10%),犹太人(6%)和其他(3%)。在基督教患者(n=123)中,天主教(n=44)和新教(n=63)都有代表。大多数受访者(140/176,80%)认为临床医生在提出治疗建议时应考虑宗教因素,75人(42%)表示有兴趣接受精神护理服务或鼓舞性资源作为其护理计划的一部分。然而,只有19%的受访者与他们的护理团队讨论过他们的精神信仰。与非黑人受访者相比,黑人受访者的这种兴趣尤其高(12/ 15.80%)(p<0.001)。FACIT-Sp-12评分中位数为33,CRS评分中位数为3.73。黑人受访者FACIT-Sp-12得分(37比33,p=0.0085)和CRS得分(4.4比3.67,p=0.0092)显著高于黑人,表明黑人具有更强的精神认同感。与所有其他受访者相比,无神论者/不可知论者的FACIT-Sp-12(中位数22.5 vs 35, p<0.001)和CRS评分(中位数1.33 vs 3.87, p<0.001)显着降低,反映了较低的精神幸福感和宗教信仰。这些患者在QLQ-MY20上的身体形象得分也较低(66.67比83.34,p=0.01)。Spearman相关分析显示,CRS与QLQ-MY20疾病症状子量表呈微弱但显著的正相关(ρ = 0.17,p < 0.05)。灵性测量与QLQ-MY20量表之间没有其他显著的相关性。结论多发性骨髓瘤患者的灵性和宗教信仰差异较大。黑人患者的精神认同水平较高,而无神论者/不可知论者的精神得分较低,身体形象也较差。近一半的受访者表示有兴趣将精神护理纳入他们的治疗经历,其中包括80%的黑人患者。这些发现支持通过将精神护理服务纳入常规骨髓瘤护理中来推进以患者为中心的护理,以满足患者的不同需求和偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.00%
发文量
139
审稿时长
98 days
期刊介绍: Journal of the National Medical Association, the official journal of the National Medical Association, is a peer-reviewed publication whose purpose is to address medical care disparities of persons of African descent. The Journal of the National Medical Association is focused on specialized clinical research activities related to the health problems of African Americans and other minority groups. Special emphasis is placed on the application of medical science to improve the healthcare of underserved populations both in the United States and abroad. The Journal has the following objectives: (1) to expand the base of original peer-reviewed literature and the quality of that research on the topic of minority health; (2) to provide greater dissemination of this research; (3) to offer appropriate and timely recognition of the significant contributions of physicians who serve these populations; and (4) to promote engagement by member and non-member physicians in the overall goals and objectives of the National Medical Association.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信