Barriers and Facilitators to Timely Distal Radius Fracture Care

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Sciaska Ulysse BA, Jeffrey W. Kwong MD, MS, Kalpit Shah MD, Robin N. Kamal MD, MBA, MS, Lauren M. Shapiro MD, MS
{"title":"Barriers and Facilitators to Timely Distal Radius Fracture Care","authors":"Sciaska Ulysse BA,&nbsp;Jeffrey W. Kwong MD, MS,&nbsp;Kalpit Shah MD,&nbsp;Robin N. Kamal MD, MBA, MS,&nbsp;Lauren M. Shapiro MD, MS","doi":"10.1016/j.jnma.2025.08.058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Despite mounting evidence that delays in the surgical treatment of displaced distal radius fractures can adversely affect outcomes, factors such as insurance type and language have been associated with disparities in time to surgery (TTS) in quantitative studies. We sought to better characterize the specific barriers and facilitators to timely surgical care of operative distal radius fractures using qualitative methods.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this multi-institutional study, we recruited English, Spanish, Mandarin, and Cantonese-speaking patients aged ≥18 years old with isolated, closed distal radius fractures treated with surgical fixation. Patients were invited to participate if their surgery was delayed (defined as ≥10 days between injury and surgery). Malunions (surgery &gt;6 weeks after injury) were excluded. Interviews were conducted using a semi-structured interview guide and were audio recorded, de-identified, and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was conducted using a deductive approach guided by the Models of Pathways to Treatment framework, which describes the events, processes, and intervals from the initial injury to the start of treatment. Representative quotes were selected to illustrate key barriers and facilitators following the four intervals defined by the framework: appraisal, help-seeking, diagnostic, and pre-treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Eighteen individuals (mean age 55.2 ±17.4 years) completed a semi-structured interview; 83% were female. The average TTS (SD) was 14.2 days (3.4), with a range of 10-22 days. Barriers (N=113) such as the minimization of symptoms (appraisal), language challenges (help-seeking), healthcare system inefficiency (diagnostic), and lack of insurance coverage (pre-treatment) were identified as key factors to delays in diagnosis and treatment. Facilitators (N=117) such as the presence of social support (appraisal), patients’ familiarity with the hospital system (help-seeking), early involvement of orthopaedic surgeons rather than other non-specialized providers (diagnostic), and thorough patient education (pre-treatment), were recognized as factors that may help minimize delays.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Qualitative interviews identified factors influencing timely surgical care for distal radius fractures. Distal radius fractures involve multiple care phases, each with compounding roadblocks. Findings highlight the need for targeted interventions such as streamlined referral pathways, expanded multilingual patient education, and policy changes addressing insurance-related delays.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17369,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Medical Association","volume":"117 1","pages":"Page 30"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0027968425002548","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Despite mounting evidence that delays in the surgical treatment of displaced distal radius fractures can adversely affect outcomes, factors such as insurance type and language have been associated with disparities in time to surgery (TTS) in quantitative studies. We sought to better characterize the specific barriers and facilitators to timely surgical care of operative distal radius fractures using qualitative methods.

Methods

In this multi-institutional study, we recruited English, Spanish, Mandarin, and Cantonese-speaking patients aged ≥18 years old with isolated, closed distal radius fractures treated with surgical fixation. Patients were invited to participate if their surgery was delayed (defined as ≥10 days between injury and surgery). Malunions (surgery >6 weeks after injury) were excluded. Interviews were conducted using a semi-structured interview guide and were audio recorded, de-identified, and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was conducted using a deductive approach guided by the Models of Pathways to Treatment framework, which describes the events, processes, and intervals from the initial injury to the start of treatment. Representative quotes were selected to illustrate key barriers and facilitators following the four intervals defined by the framework: appraisal, help-seeking, diagnostic, and pre-treatment.

Results

Eighteen individuals (mean age 55.2 ±17.4 years) completed a semi-structured interview; 83% were female. The average TTS (SD) was 14.2 days (3.4), with a range of 10-22 days. Barriers (N=113) such as the minimization of symptoms (appraisal), language challenges (help-seeking), healthcare system inefficiency (diagnostic), and lack of insurance coverage (pre-treatment) were identified as key factors to delays in diagnosis and treatment. Facilitators (N=117) such as the presence of social support (appraisal), patients’ familiarity with the hospital system (help-seeking), early involvement of orthopaedic surgeons rather than other non-specialized providers (diagnostic), and thorough patient education (pre-treatment), were recognized as factors that may help minimize delays.

Conclusion

Qualitative interviews identified factors influencing timely surgical care for distal radius fractures. Distal radius fractures involve multiple care phases, each with compounding roadblocks. Findings highlight the need for targeted interventions such as streamlined referral pathways, expanded multilingual patient education, and policy changes addressing insurance-related delays.
桡骨远端骨折及时护理的障碍和促进因素
尽管越来越多的证据表明,移位性桡骨远端骨折的手术治疗延迟会对预后产生不利影响,但在定量研究中,保险类型和语言等因素与手术时间(TTS)差异有关。我们试图用定性方法更好地描述手术桡骨远端骨折及时手术护理的具体障碍和促进因素。方法在这项多机构研究中,我们招募了年龄≥18岁的英语、西班牙语、普通话和粤语患者,这些患者均为孤立的、闭合性桡骨远端骨折,经手术固定治疗。如果患者的手术延迟(定义为损伤与手术之间≥10天),则邀请患者参加。排除畸形愈合(伤后6周手术)。访谈采用半结构化访谈指南进行,录音,去识别,并逐字转录。主题分析采用演绎方法进行,由治疗途径框架模型指导,该框架描述了从初始损伤到治疗开始的事件、过程和时间间隔。根据框架定义的四个间隔:评估、寻求帮助、诊断和预处理,选取具有代表性的引文来说明主要障碍和促进因素。结果18例患者完成了半结构化访谈,平均年龄55.2±17.4岁;83%是女性。平均TTS (SD)为14.2天(3.4天),范围为10 ~ 22天。障碍(N=113),如症状最小化(评估)、语言挑战(寻求帮助)、医疗保健系统效率低下(诊断)和缺乏保险覆盖(治疗前)被确定为诊断和治疗延误的关键因素。促进因素(N=117),如社会支持的存在(评估),患者对医院系统的熟悉程度(寻求帮助),早期参与骨科医生而不是其他非专业提供者(诊断),以及彻底的患者教育(治疗前),被认为是可能有助于减少延误的因素。结论定性访谈确定了影响桡骨远端骨折及时手术治疗的因素。桡骨远端骨折涉及多个护理阶段,每个阶段都有复杂的障碍。研究结果强调需要有针对性的干预措施,如简化转诊途径,扩大多语言患者教育,以及解决保险相关延误的政策变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.00%
发文量
139
审稿时长
98 days
期刊介绍: Journal of the National Medical Association, the official journal of the National Medical Association, is a peer-reviewed publication whose purpose is to address medical care disparities of persons of African descent. The Journal of the National Medical Association is focused on specialized clinical research activities related to the health problems of African Americans and other minority groups. Special emphasis is placed on the application of medical science to improve the healthcare of underserved populations both in the United States and abroad. The Journal has the following objectives: (1) to expand the base of original peer-reviewed literature and the quality of that research on the topic of minority health; (2) to provide greater dissemination of this research; (3) to offer appropriate and timely recognition of the significant contributions of physicians who serve these populations; and (4) to promote engagement by member and non-member physicians in the overall goals and objectives of the National Medical Association.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信