Sciaska Ulysse BA, Jeffrey W. Kwong MD, MS, Kalpit Shah MD, Robin N. Kamal MD, MBA, MS, Lauren M. Shapiro MD, MS
{"title":"Barriers and Facilitators to Timely Distal Radius Fracture Care","authors":"Sciaska Ulysse BA, Jeffrey W. Kwong MD, MS, Kalpit Shah MD, Robin N. Kamal MD, MBA, MS, Lauren M. Shapiro MD, MS","doi":"10.1016/j.jnma.2025.08.058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Despite mounting evidence that delays in the surgical treatment of displaced distal radius fractures can adversely affect outcomes, factors such as insurance type and language have been associated with disparities in time to surgery (TTS) in quantitative studies. We sought to better characterize the specific barriers and facilitators to timely surgical care of operative distal radius fractures using qualitative methods.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this multi-institutional study, we recruited English, Spanish, Mandarin, and Cantonese-speaking patients aged ≥18 years old with isolated, closed distal radius fractures treated with surgical fixation. Patients were invited to participate if their surgery was delayed (defined as ≥10 days between injury and surgery). Malunions (surgery >6 weeks after injury) were excluded. Interviews were conducted using a semi-structured interview guide and were audio recorded, de-identified, and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was conducted using a deductive approach guided by the Models of Pathways to Treatment framework, which describes the events, processes, and intervals from the initial injury to the start of treatment. Representative quotes were selected to illustrate key barriers and facilitators following the four intervals defined by the framework: appraisal, help-seeking, diagnostic, and pre-treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Eighteen individuals (mean age 55.2 ±17.4 years) completed a semi-structured interview; 83% were female. The average TTS (SD) was 14.2 days (3.4), with a range of 10-22 days. Barriers (N=113) such as the minimization of symptoms (appraisal), language challenges (help-seeking), healthcare system inefficiency (diagnostic), and lack of insurance coverage (pre-treatment) were identified as key factors to delays in diagnosis and treatment. Facilitators (N=117) such as the presence of social support (appraisal), patients’ familiarity with the hospital system (help-seeking), early involvement of orthopaedic surgeons rather than other non-specialized providers (diagnostic), and thorough patient education (pre-treatment), were recognized as factors that may help minimize delays.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Qualitative interviews identified factors influencing timely surgical care for distal radius fractures. Distal radius fractures involve multiple care phases, each with compounding roadblocks. Findings highlight the need for targeted interventions such as streamlined referral pathways, expanded multilingual patient education, and policy changes addressing insurance-related delays.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17369,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Medical Association","volume":"117 1","pages":"Page 30"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0027968425002548","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Despite mounting evidence that delays in the surgical treatment of displaced distal radius fractures can adversely affect outcomes, factors such as insurance type and language have been associated with disparities in time to surgery (TTS) in quantitative studies. We sought to better characterize the specific barriers and facilitators to timely surgical care of operative distal radius fractures using qualitative methods.
Methods
In this multi-institutional study, we recruited English, Spanish, Mandarin, and Cantonese-speaking patients aged ≥18 years old with isolated, closed distal radius fractures treated with surgical fixation. Patients were invited to participate if their surgery was delayed (defined as ≥10 days between injury and surgery). Malunions (surgery >6 weeks after injury) were excluded. Interviews were conducted using a semi-structured interview guide and were audio recorded, de-identified, and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was conducted using a deductive approach guided by the Models of Pathways to Treatment framework, which describes the events, processes, and intervals from the initial injury to the start of treatment. Representative quotes were selected to illustrate key barriers and facilitators following the four intervals defined by the framework: appraisal, help-seeking, diagnostic, and pre-treatment.
Results
Eighteen individuals (mean age 55.2 ±17.4 years) completed a semi-structured interview; 83% were female. The average TTS (SD) was 14.2 days (3.4), with a range of 10-22 days. Barriers (N=113) such as the minimization of symptoms (appraisal), language challenges (help-seeking), healthcare system inefficiency (diagnostic), and lack of insurance coverage (pre-treatment) were identified as key factors to delays in diagnosis and treatment. Facilitators (N=117) such as the presence of social support (appraisal), patients’ familiarity with the hospital system (help-seeking), early involvement of orthopaedic surgeons rather than other non-specialized providers (diagnostic), and thorough patient education (pre-treatment), were recognized as factors that may help minimize delays.
Conclusion
Qualitative interviews identified factors influencing timely surgical care for distal radius fractures. Distal radius fractures involve multiple care phases, each with compounding roadblocks. Findings highlight the need for targeted interventions such as streamlined referral pathways, expanded multilingual patient education, and policy changes addressing insurance-related delays.
期刊介绍:
Journal of the National Medical Association, the official journal of the National Medical Association, is a peer-reviewed publication whose purpose is to address medical care disparities of persons of African descent.
The Journal of the National Medical Association is focused on specialized clinical research activities related to the health problems of African Americans and other minority groups. Special emphasis is placed on the application of medical science to improve the healthcare of underserved populations both in the United States and abroad. The Journal has the following objectives: (1) to expand the base of original peer-reviewed literature and the quality of that research on the topic of minority health; (2) to provide greater dissemination of this research; (3) to offer appropriate and timely recognition of the significant contributions of physicians who serve these populations; and (4) to promote engagement by member and non-member physicians in the overall goals and objectives of the National Medical Association.