Assessing Healthcare Inequities in Shoulder Dislocation Management and Outcomes

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Tia Clay BS, Sylvester Okoro MS, Kyle Smith MS, Kyra Robinson BS, Onais Tariq, Cleo Stafford II MD, MS, Edward R. Jackson II MD
{"title":"Assessing Healthcare Inequities in Shoulder Dislocation Management and Outcomes","authors":"Tia Clay BS,&nbsp;Sylvester Okoro MS,&nbsp;Kyle Smith MS,&nbsp;Kyra Robinson BS,&nbsp;Onais Tariq,&nbsp;Cleo Stafford II MD, MS,&nbsp;Edward R. Jackson II MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jnma.2025.08.057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The inherent instability of the glenohumeral joint and the lesions it produces are major contributors to shoulder pain. As one of the most commonly treated sports injuries, shoulder dislocations have benefited from significant advancements in arthroscopic techniques and rehabilitative approaches to restore joint function. However, despite these improvements, research on disparities in the management and outcomes of shoulder dislocations remains limited. Our objective was to comprehensively analyze the existing health inequities related to shoulder dislocation to better understand the complex interplay between healthcare access barriers and disparities in treatment outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic review was conducted using PubMed, including studies published between 2000 and 2023 examining disparities in shoulder dislocation management. Keywords included “shoulder dislocation,” “shoulder instability,” “healthcare disparities,” “insurance status,” “race/ethnicity,” and “access to care.” Of 233 initially identified studies, 12 met inclusion criteria. Data were extracted on patient demographics, surgical rates, time to surgery, and post-surgical outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Barriers to surgical management, prolonged time to surgery, and delays in diagnosis and access to care for shoulder dislocation were associated with public insurance status and racial minority groups. Additionally, publicly insured patients were more likely to be readmitted or experience postoperative complications. Shoulder instability was associated with minority race, male sex, and older age, with Black and Asian patients experiencing more significant pathology and lower post-surgical baseline activity levels. At the same time, socioeconomic factors like insurance status and community distress influenced preoperative severity.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion/Conclusion</h3><div>Systemic inequities in healthcare access continue to impact the management and outcomes of shoulder dislocations, particularly among patients with public insurance and lower socioeconomic status. Despite Medicaid expansion, access to orthopedic care remains limited due to low provider reimbursement rates, administrative burdens, and higher appointment refusal rates for Medicaid patients. Expanding Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) and increasing Medicaid reimbursement have shown potential to address these barriers, but more systemic reforms should be considered. Standardized treatment protocols and improved access to specialty care may help close the gap in surgical intervention rates and postoperative outcomes. Addressing such disparities requires further research into targeted policy solutions and healthcare models that improve accessibility, streamline treatment pathways, and ensure equitable care for all patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17369,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Medical Association","volume":"117 1","pages":"Pages 29-30"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0027968425002536","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The inherent instability of the glenohumeral joint and the lesions it produces are major contributors to shoulder pain. As one of the most commonly treated sports injuries, shoulder dislocations have benefited from significant advancements in arthroscopic techniques and rehabilitative approaches to restore joint function. However, despite these improvements, research on disparities in the management and outcomes of shoulder dislocations remains limited. Our objective was to comprehensively analyze the existing health inequities related to shoulder dislocation to better understand the complex interplay between healthcare access barriers and disparities in treatment outcomes.

Methods

A systematic review was conducted using PubMed, including studies published between 2000 and 2023 examining disparities in shoulder dislocation management. Keywords included “shoulder dislocation,” “shoulder instability,” “healthcare disparities,” “insurance status,” “race/ethnicity,” and “access to care.” Of 233 initially identified studies, 12 met inclusion criteria. Data were extracted on patient demographics, surgical rates, time to surgery, and post-surgical outcomes.

Results

Barriers to surgical management, prolonged time to surgery, and delays in diagnosis and access to care for shoulder dislocation were associated with public insurance status and racial minority groups. Additionally, publicly insured patients were more likely to be readmitted or experience postoperative complications. Shoulder instability was associated with minority race, male sex, and older age, with Black and Asian patients experiencing more significant pathology and lower post-surgical baseline activity levels. At the same time, socioeconomic factors like insurance status and community distress influenced preoperative severity.

Discussion/Conclusion

Systemic inequities in healthcare access continue to impact the management and outcomes of shoulder dislocations, particularly among patients with public insurance and lower socioeconomic status. Despite Medicaid expansion, access to orthopedic care remains limited due to low provider reimbursement rates, administrative burdens, and higher appointment refusal rates for Medicaid patients. Expanding Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) and increasing Medicaid reimbursement have shown potential to address these barriers, but more systemic reforms should be considered. Standardized treatment protocols and improved access to specialty care may help close the gap in surgical intervention rates and postoperative outcomes. Addressing such disparities requires further research into targeted policy solutions and healthcare models that improve accessibility, streamline treatment pathways, and ensure equitable care for all patients.
评估肩关节脱位管理和结果中的医疗不公平
肩关节固有的不稳定性及其产生的病变是导致肩关节疼痛的主要原因。肩关节脱位作为最常见的运动损伤之一,得益于关节镜技术和关节功能康复方法的显著进步。然而,尽管有这些改进,关于肩关节脱位治疗和预后差异的研究仍然有限。我们的目的是全面分析与肩脱位相关的现有健康不平等,以更好地理解医疗保健获取障碍和治疗结果差异之间复杂的相互作用。方法利用PubMed进行系统回顾,包括2000年至2023年间发表的关于肩关节脱位治疗差异的研究。关键词包括“肩部脱位”、“肩部不稳定”、“医疗保健差距”、“保险状况”、“种族/民族”和“获得护理”。在最初确定的233项研究中,有12项符合纳入标准。提取患者人口统计学、手术率、手术时间和术后结果的数据。结果肩关节脱位的手术治疗障碍、手术时间延长、诊断和护理延误与公共保险状况和少数种族有关。此外,公共保险患者更有可能再次入院或经历术后并发症。肩部不稳定与少数民族、男性和年龄较大有关,黑人和亚洲患者的病理更明显,术后基线活动水平更低。同时,社会经济因素如保险状况和社区困境影响术前严重程度。讨论/结论医疗服务可及性的系统性不公平继续影响肩关节脱位的管理和预后,特别是在公共保险和社会经济地位较低的患者中。尽管医疗补助扩大了,但由于医疗服务提供者报销率低、行政负担和医疗补助患者更高的预约拒绝率,获得骨科护理的机会仍然有限。扩大联邦合格医疗中心(FQHCs)和增加医疗补助报销已经显示出解决这些障碍的潜力,但应该考虑更多的系统改革。标准化的治疗方案和改善专科护理的可及性可能有助于缩小手术干预率和术后结果的差距。解决这种差异需要进一步研究有针对性的政策解决方案和医疗保健模式,以改善可及性,简化治疗途径,并确保所有患者得到公平的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.00%
发文量
139
审稿时长
98 days
期刊介绍: Journal of the National Medical Association, the official journal of the National Medical Association, is a peer-reviewed publication whose purpose is to address medical care disparities of persons of African descent. The Journal of the National Medical Association is focused on specialized clinical research activities related to the health problems of African Americans and other minority groups. Special emphasis is placed on the application of medical science to improve the healthcare of underserved populations both in the United States and abroad. The Journal has the following objectives: (1) to expand the base of original peer-reviewed literature and the quality of that research on the topic of minority health; (2) to provide greater dissemination of this research; (3) to offer appropriate and timely recognition of the significant contributions of physicians who serve these populations; and (4) to promote engagement by member and non-member physicians in the overall goals and objectives of the National Medical Association.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信