AI automatic decision in newsvendor model with Nash bargaining fairness concern

IF 4.3 2区 工程技术 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Rui Hou, Yishen Cen, Jianxin Chen
{"title":"AI automatic decision in newsvendor model with Nash bargaining fairness concern","authors":"Rui Hou,&nbsp;Yishen Cen,&nbsp;Jianxin Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.cor.2025.107227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper investigates the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) automatic ordering and producing decisions on fairness-concerned supply chains under the newsvendor model. We develop a dyadic supply chain model in which the manufacturer acts as the Stackelberg leader while the retailer serves as the follower in a push supply chain. In contrast, their roles are switched in a pull supply chain. We assume that only human decision-making leads to decision regret behavior, whereas AI-automated decision-making does not. Without adopting AI, our results show that fairness concern does not necessarily lead to a decreasing quantity in ordering or producing, which is different from most previous studies. Different from the prior findings, our work reveals that in binding equilibrium, if fairness concerns are considered, the order quantity will decrease, while in non-binding equilibrium, the order quantity may not necessarily be less than the previous results. Interestingly, when decision regret bias is considered for fairness-concerned decision-makers, we can obtain quantity coordination solutions for supply chains under specific conditions. With adopting AI, our results show that increasing fairness concerns are beneficial for improving the follower’s profit while at the expense of sacrificing the leader’s profit margins, while the leader can only benefit from AI adoption when the decision regret bias of the follower is relatively high. It is noteworthy that under certain conditions, AI automation may negatively impact the profits of both push and pull decentralized supply chains. For instance, in low-margin profit scenarios where decision-makers exhibit moderate regret bias and fairness concerns, such effects can emerge. This indicates that under specific circumstances, the human behavioral factors — regret bias and fairness concerns — may sometimes enhance the performance of decentralized supply chain members. Our research findings provide significant practical implications for the adoption of AI-automated decision-making in real-world supply chains.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10542,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Operations Research","volume":"185 ","pages":"Article 107227"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Operations Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305054825002564","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper investigates the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) automatic ordering and producing decisions on fairness-concerned supply chains under the newsvendor model. We develop a dyadic supply chain model in which the manufacturer acts as the Stackelberg leader while the retailer serves as the follower in a push supply chain. In contrast, their roles are switched in a pull supply chain. We assume that only human decision-making leads to decision regret behavior, whereas AI-automated decision-making does not. Without adopting AI, our results show that fairness concern does not necessarily lead to a decreasing quantity in ordering or producing, which is different from most previous studies. Different from the prior findings, our work reveals that in binding equilibrium, if fairness concerns are considered, the order quantity will decrease, while in non-binding equilibrium, the order quantity may not necessarily be less than the previous results. Interestingly, when decision regret bias is considered for fairness-concerned decision-makers, we can obtain quantity coordination solutions for supply chains under specific conditions. With adopting AI, our results show that increasing fairness concerns are beneficial for improving the follower’s profit while at the expense of sacrificing the leader’s profit margins, while the leader can only benefit from AI adoption when the decision regret bias of the follower is relatively high. It is noteworthy that under certain conditions, AI automation may negatively impact the profits of both push and pull decentralized supply chains. For instance, in low-margin profit scenarios where decision-makers exhibit moderate regret bias and fairness concerns, such effects can emerge. This indicates that under specific circumstances, the human behavioral factors — regret bias and fairness concerns — may sometimes enhance the performance of decentralized supply chain members. Our research findings provide significant practical implications for the adoption of AI-automated decision-making in real-world supply chains.
考虑纳什议价公平性的报贩模型中的人工智能自动决策
本文研究了报贩模型下人工智能(AI)自动订货和生产决策对公平供应链的影响。我们建立了一个二元供应链模型,其中制造商是Stackelberg的领导者,零售商是推式供应链的追随者。相反,他们的角色在拉式供应链中互换。我们假设只有人类的决策才会导致决策后悔行为,而人工智能自动决策则不会。在不采用人工智能的情况下,我们的研究结果表明,公平关注并不一定导致订货或生产数量的减少,这与以往大多数研究不同。与之前的研究结果不同,我们的研究表明,在约束性均衡中,如果考虑公平性问题,订单数量会减少,而在非约束性均衡中,订单数量不一定比之前的结果少。有趣的是,当考虑公平性问题的决策者的决策后悔偏差时,我们可以得到特定条件下供应链的数量协调解。在采用人工智能的情况下,我们的研究结果表明,增加公平关注有利于提高追随者的利润,但以牺牲领导者的利润率为代价,而领导者只有在追随者的决策后悔偏差相对较高时才能从采用人工智能中受益。值得注意的是,在某些条件下,人工智能自动化可能会对推拉式分散供应链的利润产生负面影响。例如,在低利润率的情况下,决策者表现出适度的遗憾偏见和公平问题,这种影响就会出现。这表明,在特定情况下,人类行为因素——后悔偏差和公平问题——有时可能会提高分散供应链成员的绩效。我们的研究结果为在现实世界的供应链中采用人工智能自动化决策提供了重要的实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computers & Operations Research
Computers & Operations Research 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
8.70%
发文量
292
审稿时长
8.5 months
期刊介绍: Operations research and computers meet in a large number of scientific fields, many of which are of vital current concern to our troubled society. These include, among others, ecology, transportation, safety, reliability, urban planning, economics, inventory control, investment strategy and logistics (including reverse logistics). Computers & Operations Research provides an international forum for the application of computers and operations research techniques to problems in these and related fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信