Alyssa Bailey , Tyler R. Wanke , Rhea Verma , Thomas Kurth , Conor Shanley , Erin Mohr , Scott Irving , V. Suzanne Klimberg , Luis Blanco , Swati Kulkarni , Kevin Bethke
{"title":"A novel technology for margin extension and local control in breast conservation surgery: Saline-coupled intraoperative radiofrequency ablation (SIRA)","authors":"Alyssa Bailey , Tyler R. Wanke , Rhea Verma , Thomas Kurth , Conor Shanley , Erin Mohr , Scott Irving , V. Suzanne Klimberg , Luis Blanco , Swati Kulkarni , Kevin Bethke","doi":"10.1016/j.suronc.2025.102280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Importance</h3><div>Breast-conserving therapy (BCT) results in reoperation in ∼20 % of cases due to positive margins, and a 7–13 % recurrence risk at 5 years persists despite negative margins and radiation. Enhancing margin treatment is critical to reducing local recurrence and improving survival.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To optimize and evaluate the performance of a Saline-coupled Intraoperative Radiofrequency Ablation (SIRA) device in producing uniform 1 cm ablations in lumpectomy cavities and compare it to prior-generation RFA technology in previous clinical studies.</div></div><div><h3>Design, setting, and participants</h3><div>This case series (2018–2023) included 55 mock lumpectomies performed on prophylactic mastectomy or cadaver breasts under an IRB-approved protocol. Inclusion required disease-free, sufficient-volume breast tissue with patient consent.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>55 ablations were performed on breasts from 44 female patients. The SIRA produced an ablation depth of 1.0 ± 0.2 cm (mean, SD), no significant difference between margins (p = 0.056). No significant difference in ablation depth across the following: BI-RADS breast composition (p = 0.212), age (p = 0.188), height (p = 0.643), weight (p = 0.522), tissue volume removed (p = 1.000), breast surgery history (p = 0.246), chest chemotherapy/radiation history (p = 0.477), or surgeon (p = 0.579). Significant difference in depth and variance between the SIRA and previous-generation technology (p < 0.001 and p = 0.016), with SIRA significantly deeper and more uniform.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Lumpectomy followed by SIRA could reduce positive margin rates and treat additional tissue, resulting in reduction in re-excision rates and serve as a potential alternative to radiation therapy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51185,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Oncology-Oxford","volume":"63 ","pages":"Article 102280"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Oncology-Oxford","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960740425000957","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Importance
Breast-conserving therapy (BCT) results in reoperation in ∼20 % of cases due to positive margins, and a 7–13 % recurrence risk at 5 years persists despite negative margins and radiation. Enhancing margin treatment is critical to reducing local recurrence and improving survival.
Objective
To optimize and evaluate the performance of a Saline-coupled Intraoperative Radiofrequency Ablation (SIRA) device in producing uniform 1 cm ablations in lumpectomy cavities and compare it to prior-generation RFA technology in previous clinical studies.
Design, setting, and participants
This case series (2018–2023) included 55 mock lumpectomies performed on prophylactic mastectomy or cadaver breasts under an IRB-approved protocol. Inclusion required disease-free, sufficient-volume breast tissue with patient consent.
Results
55 ablations were performed on breasts from 44 female patients. The SIRA produced an ablation depth of 1.0 ± 0.2 cm (mean, SD), no significant difference between margins (p = 0.056). No significant difference in ablation depth across the following: BI-RADS breast composition (p = 0.212), age (p = 0.188), height (p = 0.643), weight (p = 0.522), tissue volume removed (p = 1.000), breast surgery history (p = 0.246), chest chemotherapy/radiation history (p = 0.477), or surgeon (p = 0.579). Significant difference in depth and variance between the SIRA and previous-generation technology (p < 0.001 and p = 0.016), with SIRA significantly deeper and more uniform.
Conclusion
Lumpectomy followed by SIRA could reduce positive margin rates and treat additional tissue, resulting in reduction in re-excision rates and serve as a potential alternative to radiation therapy.
期刊介绍:
Surgical Oncology is a peer reviewed journal publishing review articles that contribute to the advancement of knowledge in surgical oncology and related fields of interest. Articles represent a spectrum of current technology in oncology research as well as those concerning clinical trials, surgical technique, methods of investigation and patient evaluation. Surgical Oncology publishes comprehensive Reviews that examine individual topics in considerable detail, in addition to editorials and commentaries which focus on selected papers. The journal also publishes special issues which explore topics of interest to surgical oncologists in great detail - outlining recent advancements and providing readers with the most up to date information.