Health Inequities within Radiation Treatment after Neurosurgery

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Opeyemi E. Adelugba BS, LaCreis Kidd PhD, MPH, Brian Williams MD, Akshitkumar Mistry MD, Donald Miller MD, PhD, Joseph Chen PhD, Kavitha Yaddanapudi PhD, Shesh Rai PhD, Shearwood McClelland III MD, Adrianna Masters MD, PhD
{"title":"Health Inequities within Radiation Treatment after Neurosurgery","authors":"Opeyemi E. Adelugba BS,&nbsp;LaCreis Kidd PhD, MPH,&nbsp;Brian Williams MD,&nbsp;Akshitkumar Mistry MD,&nbsp;Donald Miller MD, PhD,&nbsp;Joseph Chen PhD,&nbsp;Kavitha Yaddanapudi PhD,&nbsp;Shesh Rai PhD,&nbsp;Shearwood McClelland III MD,&nbsp;Adrianna Masters MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jnma.2025.08.073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose/Objective(s)</h3><div>Brain metastases are the most frequent intracranial tumor type. Following surgical treatment of patients with brain metastases, about half of them will experience disease recurrence without adjuvant therapy. This relapse can be lowered with either whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Unfortunately, rural patients often underutilize adjuvant therapy, despite radiosurgery having fewer acute and long-term side effects compared to WBRT alone. There are no published reports to inform radiation oncologists on how to improve the use of adjuvant therapy among metastatic brain cancer patients from underserved communities in Kentucky. Thus, there is a critical need to understand factors related to this disparity to improve disease prognosis in this population. We hypothesize differences in the use of adjuvant therapy are related to limited access to specialized care, lack of nurse navigators, and socioeconomic challenges among underserved populations, leading to poor disease prognosis.</div></div><div><h3>Materials/Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively identified patients with brain metastases who underwent surgical resection of 1-3 brain metastases between July 2018 to July 2023 at the University of Louisville Health Brown Cancer Center. We collected demographic, treatment type, and outcome data related to their follow-up and post-operative care (IRB 22.0796). To assess differences between categorical and quantitative data, we used the Fisher’s exact test and the Wilcoxon sum rank test with a significance level of 0.05.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A majority of the patients were middle-aged [mean = 61; range = 39-81], white (80% white, 20% black), 55% male, 65% urban residents, 55% overweight/obese, and 22.5% uninsured. Rural patients were more likely to lack health insurance than those from urban areas (27.3% vs 14.3%; p = 0.0307). Among patients who were scheduled for a radiation oncology appointment post-surgery, only 13.3% kept their appointment. Notably, Black patients received higher radiation fractions (p = 0.0139) and were more likely to reside near the Brown Cancer Center compared to White patients. Disparities in death from 1-year post surgery and brain failure were more prevalent among both rural patients (p = 0.0044) and those who lacked insurance (p =0.008) than patients who lived in urban areas or who had insurance, respectively. Lastly, none of the patients were assigned patient navigators.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our findings suggest patients from rural areas could benefit from additional resources such as a nurse navigator to address patients’ questions regarding the treatment process, ensure the patient meets with a radiation oncologist, and receive reminders to complete all prescribed radiation treatment post neurosurgery. Lastly, a nurse navigator can help patients secure needed health insurance, which will reduce financial barriers to adjuvant therapy and the burden of the disease, especially among rural KY residents.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17369,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Medical Association","volume":"117 1","pages":"Pages 38-39"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002796842500269X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose/Objective(s)

Brain metastases are the most frequent intracranial tumor type. Following surgical treatment of patients with brain metastases, about half of them will experience disease recurrence without adjuvant therapy. This relapse can be lowered with either whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Unfortunately, rural patients often underutilize adjuvant therapy, despite radiosurgery having fewer acute and long-term side effects compared to WBRT alone. There are no published reports to inform radiation oncologists on how to improve the use of adjuvant therapy among metastatic brain cancer patients from underserved communities in Kentucky. Thus, there is a critical need to understand factors related to this disparity to improve disease prognosis in this population. We hypothesize differences in the use of adjuvant therapy are related to limited access to specialized care, lack of nurse navigators, and socioeconomic challenges among underserved populations, leading to poor disease prognosis.

Materials/Methods

We retrospectively identified patients with brain metastases who underwent surgical resection of 1-3 brain metastases between July 2018 to July 2023 at the University of Louisville Health Brown Cancer Center. We collected demographic, treatment type, and outcome data related to their follow-up and post-operative care (IRB 22.0796). To assess differences between categorical and quantitative data, we used the Fisher’s exact test and the Wilcoxon sum rank test with a significance level of 0.05.

Results

A majority of the patients were middle-aged [mean = 61; range = 39-81], white (80% white, 20% black), 55% male, 65% urban residents, 55% overweight/obese, and 22.5% uninsured. Rural patients were more likely to lack health insurance than those from urban areas (27.3% vs 14.3%; p = 0.0307). Among patients who were scheduled for a radiation oncology appointment post-surgery, only 13.3% kept their appointment. Notably, Black patients received higher radiation fractions (p = 0.0139) and were more likely to reside near the Brown Cancer Center compared to White patients. Disparities in death from 1-year post surgery and brain failure were more prevalent among both rural patients (p = 0.0044) and those who lacked insurance (p =0.008) than patients who lived in urban areas or who had insurance, respectively. Lastly, none of the patients were assigned patient navigators.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest patients from rural areas could benefit from additional resources such as a nurse navigator to address patients’ questions regarding the treatment process, ensure the patient meets with a radiation oncologist, and receive reminders to complete all prescribed radiation treatment post neurosurgery. Lastly, a nurse navigator can help patients secure needed health insurance, which will reduce financial barriers to adjuvant therapy and the burden of the disease, especially among rural KY residents.
神经外科术后放射治疗中的健康不平等
目的/目的脑转移瘤是最常见的颅内肿瘤类型。脑转移患者在手术治疗后,约有一半的患者在没有辅助治疗的情况下会出现疾病复发。这种复发可以通过全脑放射治疗(WBRT)或立体定向放射手术(SRS)来降低。不幸的是,农村患者往往没有充分利用辅助治疗,尽管放射手术与单独的WBRT相比具有更少的急性和长期副作用。目前还没有发表的报告告诉放射肿瘤学家如何改善肯塔基州服务不足社区转移性脑癌患者辅助治疗的使用。因此,迫切需要了解与这种差异相关的因素,以改善该人群的疾病预后。我们假设辅助治疗使用的差异与获得专业护理的机会有限、缺乏护士导航员以及服务不足人群的社会经济挑战有关,从而导致疾病预后不良。材料/方法回顾性分析2018年7月至2023年7月在路易斯维尔大学健康布朗癌症中心接受手术切除1-3脑转移瘤的脑转移患者。我们收集了与随访和术后护理相关的人口统计学、治疗类型和结局数据(IRB 22.0796)。为了评估分类和定量数据之间的差异,我们使用Fisher精确检验和Wilcoxon和秩检验,显著性水平为0.05。结果患者以中年人居多[平均 = 61;范围 = 39-81],白人(80%白人,20%黑人),55%男性,65%城市居民,55%超重/肥胖,22.5%无保险。农村患者比城市患者更容易缺乏医疗保险(27.3% vs 14.3%; p = 0.0307)。在术后接受放射肿瘤学预约的患者中,只有13.3%的人遵守了预约。值得注意的是,与白人患者相比,黑人患者接受了更高的辐射分数(p = 0.0139),并且更有可能居住在布朗癌症中心附近。术后1年死亡和脑衰竭的差异在农村患者(p = 0.0044)和缺乏保险的患者(p =0.008)中分别比生活在城市地区或有保险的患者更为普遍。最后,没有一个病人被分配到病人导航器。结论我们的研究结果表明,农村地区的患者可以从额外的资源中受益,例如护士导航员来解决患者关于治疗过程的问题,确保患者与放射肿瘤学家会面,并在神经外科手术后收到完成所有规定放射治疗的提醒。最后,护士导航员可以帮助患者获得所需的健康保险,这将减少辅助治疗的经济障碍和疾病负担,特别是在肯塔基州农村居民中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.00%
发文量
139
审稿时长
98 days
期刊介绍: Journal of the National Medical Association, the official journal of the National Medical Association, is a peer-reviewed publication whose purpose is to address medical care disparities of persons of African descent. The Journal of the National Medical Association is focused on specialized clinical research activities related to the health problems of African Americans and other minority groups. Special emphasis is placed on the application of medical science to improve the healthcare of underserved populations both in the United States and abroad. The Journal has the following objectives: (1) to expand the base of original peer-reviewed literature and the quality of that research on the topic of minority health; (2) to provide greater dissemination of this research; (3) to offer appropriate and timely recognition of the significant contributions of physicians who serve these populations; and (4) to promote engagement by member and non-member physicians in the overall goals and objectives of the National Medical Association.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信