Overcoming Patient Hesitancy in Clinical Trial Enrollment

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Angela N. Quach NP
{"title":"Overcoming Patient Hesitancy in Clinical Trial Enrollment","authors":"Angela N. Quach NP","doi":"10.1016/j.jnma.2025.08.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Patient hesitancy to enroll remains a significant barrier to research progress despite the critical role clinical trials play in advancing medical treatments. Concerns about safety, skepticism in the medical system, lack of understanding, and logistical challenges contribute to low participation rates. This hesitancy is particularly pronounced among underrepresented populations, exacerbating healthcare disparities. Understanding the underlying reasons behind patient reluctance is crucial for developing strategies that improve enrollment rates and enhance the diversity of clinical trials.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A mixed-methods study was conducted to assess patient hesitancy in clinical trial participation. A survey was administered to 500 patients across multiple healthcare settings, including primary care clinics and specialty practices. The survey evaluated knowledge of clinical trials, perceived risks and benefits, trust in healthcare providers, and willingness to participate. Additionally, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 50 participants to gain deeper insights into personal concerns and decision-making processes. Data analysis involved descriptive statistics for survey responses and thematic analysis for interview transcripts.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Findings revealed that 65% of respondents expressed hesitancy toward clinical trial enrollment. The most common concerns included fear of unknown side effects (72%), skepticism about receiving placebo treatments (58%), and distrust in pharmaceutical companies (47%). Patients with lower health literacy were significantly more hesitant (p&lt;0.05) compared to those with higher health literacy.</div><div>Interviews highlighted additional barriers such as logistical challenges, including travel and time commitments, as well as inadequate communication from healthcare providers regarding trial benefits. However, 40% of respondents indicated they would be more likely to participate if their healthcare provider personally recommended the trial and provided clear, detailed information.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Patient hesitancy to enroll in clinical trials is multifaceted, driven by concerns about safety, trust, and logistics. Strategies to improve participation should focus on transparent communication, patient education, and building trust through provider recommendations. Addressing these barriers through culturally sensitive outreach and logistical support can enhance enrollment and contribute to more representative clinical research. Future efforts should involve collaboration between researchers, healthcare providers, and patient advocacy groups to foster a more informed and engaged patient population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17369,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Medical Association","volume":"117 1","pages":"Pages 2-3"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0027968425002081","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Patient hesitancy to enroll remains a significant barrier to research progress despite the critical role clinical trials play in advancing medical treatments. Concerns about safety, skepticism in the medical system, lack of understanding, and logistical challenges contribute to low participation rates. This hesitancy is particularly pronounced among underrepresented populations, exacerbating healthcare disparities. Understanding the underlying reasons behind patient reluctance is crucial for developing strategies that improve enrollment rates and enhance the diversity of clinical trials.

Methods

A mixed-methods study was conducted to assess patient hesitancy in clinical trial participation. A survey was administered to 500 patients across multiple healthcare settings, including primary care clinics and specialty practices. The survey evaluated knowledge of clinical trials, perceived risks and benefits, trust in healthcare providers, and willingness to participate. Additionally, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 50 participants to gain deeper insights into personal concerns and decision-making processes. Data analysis involved descriptive statistics for survey responses and thematic analysis for interview transcripts.

Results

Findings revealed that 65% of respondents expressed hesitancy toward clinical trial enrollment. The most common concerns included fear of unknown side effects (72%), skepticism about receiving placebo treatments (58%), and distrust in pharmaceutical companies (47%). Patients with lower health literacy were significantly more hesitant (p<0.05) compared to those with higher health literacy.
Interviews highlighted additional barriers such as logistical challenges, including travel and time commitments, as well as inadequate communication from healthcare providers regarding trial benefits. However, 40% of respondents indicated they would be more likely to participate if their healthcare provider personally recommended the trial and provided clear, detailed information.

Conclusion

Patient hesitancy to enroll in clinical trials is multifaceted, driven by concerns about safety, trust, and logistics. Strategies to improve participation should focus on transparent communication, patient education, and building trust through provider recommendations. Addressing these barriers through culturally sensitive outreach and logistical support can enhance enrollment and contribute to more representative clinical research. Future efforts should involve collaboration between researchers, healthcare providers, and patient advocacy groups to foster a more informed and engaged patient population.
克服临床试验入组时患者的犹豫
尽管临床试验在推进医学治疗方面发挥着关键作用,但患者对入组的犹豫仍然是研究进展的一个重大障碍。对安全的担忧、对医疗系统的怀疑、缺乏了解以及后勤方面的挑战导致了低参与率。这种犹豫在代表性不足的人群中尤为明显,加剧了医疗保健差距。了解患者不情愿背后的潜在原因对于制定提高入组率和增强临床试验多样性的策略至关重要。方法采用混合方法研究患者参与临床试验的犹豫性。对包括初级保健诊所和专科诊所在内的多个医疗保健机构的500名患者进行了一项调查。该调查评估了临床试验的知识、感知的风险和收益、对医疗保健提供者的信任以及参与的意愿。此外,还对50名参与者进行了半结构化访谈,以更深入地了解个人担忧和决策过程。数据分析包括调查答复的描述性统计和访谈记录的专题分析。结果调查结果显示,65%的受访者表示对临床试验报名犹豫不决。最常见的担忧包括对未知副作用的恐惧(72%),对接受安慰剂治疗的怀疑(58%),以及对制药公司的不信任(47%)。健康素养较低的患者比健康素养较高的患者更犹豫(p < 0.05)。访谈强调了其他障碍,如后勤方面的挑战,包括旅行和时间承诺,以及医疗保健提供者关于试验福利的沟通不足。然而,40%的受访者表示,如果他们的医疗保健提供者亲自推荐试验并提供清晰、详细的信息,他们更有可能参加试验。结论患者对参加临床试验的犹豫是多方面的,主要是出于对安全、信任和后勤的考虑。提高参与的策略应侧重于透明的沟通、患者教育和通过提供者推荐建立信任。通过文化敏感的外联和后勤支持来解决这些障碍可以提高入学率,并有助于更具代表性的临床研究。未来的努力应涉及研究人员、医疗保健提供者和患者倡导团体之间的合作,以促进更多知情和参与的患者群体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.00%
发文量
139
审稿时长
98 days
期刊介绍: Journal of the National Medical Association, the official journal of the National Medical Association, is a peer-reviewed publication whose purpose is to address medical care disparities of persons of African descent. The Journal of the National Medical Association is focused on specialized clinical research activities related to the health problems of African Americans and other minority groups. Special emphasis is placed on the application of medical science to improve the healthcare of underserved populations both in the United States and abroad. The Journal has the following objectives: (1) to expand the base of original peer-reviewed literature and the quality of that research on the topic of minority health; (2) to provide greater dissemination of this research; (3) to offer appropriate and timely recognition of the significant contributions of physicians who serve these populations; and (4) to promote engagement by member and non-member physicians in the overall goals and objectives of the National Medical Association.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信