{"title":"Overcoming Patient Hesitancy in Clinical Trial Enrollment","authors":"Angela N. Quach NP","doi":"10.1016/j.jnma.2025.08.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Patient hesitancy to enroll remains a significant barrier to research progress despite the critical role clinical trials play in advancing medical treatments. Concerns about safety, skepticism in the medical system, lack of understanding, and logistical challenges contribute to low participation rates. This hesitancy is particularly pronounced among underrepresented populations, exacerbating healthcare disparities. Understanding the underlying reasons behind patient reluctance is crucial for developing strategies that improve enrollment rates and enhance the diversity of clinical trials.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A mixed-methods study was conducted to assess patient hesitancy in clinical trial participation. A survey was administered to 500 patients across multiple healthcare settings, including primary care clinics and specialty practices. The survey evaluated knowledge of clinical trials, perceived risks and benefits, trust in healthcare providers, and willingness to participate. Additionally, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 50 participants to gain deeper insights into personal concerns and decision-making processes. Data analysis involved descriptive statistics for survey responses and thematic analysis for interview transcripts.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Findings revealed that 65% of respondents expressed hesitancy toward clinical trial enrollment. The most common concerns included fear of unknown side effects (72%), skepticism about receiving placebo treatments (58%), and distrust in pharmaceutical companies (47%). Patients with lower health literacy were significantly more hesitant (p<0.05) compared to those with higher health literacy.</div><div>Interviews highlighted additional barriers such as logistical challenges, including travel and time commitments, as well as inadequate communication from healthcare providers regarding trial benefits. However, 40% of respondents indicated they would be more likely to participate if their healthcare provider personally recommended the trial and provided clear, detailed information.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Patient hesitancy to enroll in clinical trials is multifaceted, driven by concerns about safety, trust, and logistics. Strategies to improve participation should focus on transparent communication, patient education, and building trust through provider recommendations. Addressing these barriers through culturally sensitive outreach and logistical support can enhance enrollment and contribute to more representative clinical research. Future efforts should involve collaboration between researchers, healthcare providers, and patient advocacy groups to foster a more informed and engaged patient population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17369,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Medical Association","volume":"117 1","pages":"Pages 2-3"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0027968425002081","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Patient hesitancy to enroll remains a significant barrier to research progress despite the critical role clinical trials play in advancing medical treatments. Concerns about safety, skepticism in the medical system, lack of understanding, and logistical challenges contribute to low participation rates. This hesitancy is particularly pronounced among underrepresented populations, exacerbating healthcare disparities. Understanding the underlying reasons behind patient reluctance is crucial for developing strategies that improve enrollment rates and enhance the diversity of clinical trials.
Methods
A mixed-methods study was conducted to assess patient hesitancy in clinical trial participation. A survey was administered to 500 patients across multiple healthcare settings, including primary care clinics and specialty practices. The survey evaluated knowledge of clinical trials, perceived risks and benefits, trust in healthcare providers, and willingness to participate. Additionally, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 50 participants to gain deeper insights into personal concerns and decision-making processes. Data analysis involved descriptive statistics for survey responses and thematic analysis for interview transcripts.
Results
Findings revealed that 65% of respondents expressed hesitancy toward clinical trial enrollment. The most common concerns included fear of unknown side effects (72%), skepticism about receiving placebo treatments (58%), and distrust in pharmaceutical companies (47%). Patients with lower health literacy were significantly more hesitant (p<0.05) compared to those with higher health literacy.
Interviews highlighted additional barriers such as logistical challenges, including travel and time commitments, as well as inadequate communication from healthcare providers regarding trial benefits. However, 40% of respondents indicated they would be more likely to participate if their healthcare provider personally recommended the trial and provided clear, detailed information.
Conclusion
Patient hesitancy to enroll in clinical trials is multifaceted, driven by concerns about safety, trust, and logistics. Strategies to improve participation should focus on transparent communication, patient education, and building trust through provider recommendations. Addressing these barriers through culturally sensitive outreach and logistical support can enhance enrollment and contribute to more representative clinical research. Future efforts should involve collaboration between researchers, healthcare providers, and patient advocacy groups to foster a more informed and engaged patient population.
期刊介绍:
Journal of the National Medical Association, the official journal of the National Medical Association, is a peer-reviewed publication whose purpose is to address medical care disparities of persons of African descent.
The Journal of the National Medical Association is focused on specialized clinical research activities related to the health problems of African Americans and other minority groups. Special emphasis is placed on the application of medical science to improve the healthcare of underserved populations both in the United States and abroad. The Journal has the following objectives: (1) to expand the base of original peer-reviewed literature and the quality of that research on the topic of minority health; (2) to provide greater dissemination of this research; (3) to offer appropriate and timely recognition of the significant contributions of physicians who serve these populations; and (4) to promote engagement by member and non-member physicians in the overall goals and objectives of the National Medical Association.