Internal and External Forms of Blame and Disgust and Their Relationships to Suicidal Ideation Within Vulnerable Populations.

Morgan Robison, Roshni Janakiraman, Emma Wilson-Lemoine, Megan L Rogers, Alan Duffy, Renee D Rienecke, Daniel Le Grange, Dan V Blalock, Philip S Mehler, Thomas E Joiner
{"title":"Internal and External Forms of Blame and Disgust and Their Relationships to Suicidal Ideation Within Vulnerable Populations.","authors":"Morgan Robison, Roshni Janakiraman, Emma Wilson-Lemoine, Megan L Rogers, Alan Duffy, Renee D Rienecke, Daniel Le Grange, Dan V Blalock, Philip S Mehler, Thomas E Joiner","doi":"10.1007/s41811-025-00250-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Suicide risk is elevated among vulnerable populations. We examined two forms of internalization (i.e., self-blame, self-disgust) and externalization (i.e., other-blame, societal-disgust) and their associations with suicidal ideation (SI) in two studies. In Study 1 (<i>n</i> = 967), participants with mood and/or anxiety disorders completed self-report measures at admission and discharge on self-blame, other-blame, and SI. Study 2 (<i>n</i> = 295) investigated similar constructs among a sexual minority sample, with the addition of covariates including internalized homophobia, homophobia experiences, perceived burdensomeness, and thwarted belongingness. In Study 1, self-blame at admission and discharge, but not other-blame at admission or discharge, was significantly associated with SI. Furthermore, their interaction at discharge was significant such that SI was highest for those high in self-blame and low in other-blame. Longitudinally, neither form of blame at admission was associated with SI at discharge, nor was their interaction. In Study 2, self-disgust, societal-disgust, and their interaction were significantly associated with SI beyond self-blame and other covariates. Contrary to Study 1, the form of the interaction was such that SI was highest for those high in both self-disgust and societal-disgust. Significant findings were cross-sectional; thus, future research should longitudinally test brief intervals (e.g., hours to days) to better understand these associations. These studies provide some evidence that self-blame and self-disgust, more so than otherblame and societal-disgust, may be risk factors for SI in clinical and sexual minority groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":521009,"journal":{"name":"International journal of cognitive behavioral therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12396304/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of cognitive behavioral therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41811-025-00250-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Suicide risk is elevated among vulnerable populations. We examined two forms of internalization (i.e., self-blame, self-disgust) and externalization (i.e., other-blame, societal-disgust) and their associations with suicidal ideation (SI) in two studies. In Study 1 (n = 967), participants with mood and/or anxiety disorders completed self-report measures at admission and discharge on self-blame, other-blame, and SI. Study 2 (n = 295) investigated similar constructs among a sexual minority sample, with the addition of covariates including internalized homophobia, homophobia experiences, perceived burdensomeness, and thwarted belongingness. In Study 1, self-blame at admission and discharge, but not other-blame at admission or discharge, was significantly associated with SI. Furthermore, their interaction at discharge was significant such that SI was highest for those high in self-blame and low in other-blame. Longitudinally, neither form of blame at admission was associated with SI at discharge, nor was their interaction. In Study 2, self-disgust, societal-disgust, and their interaction were significantly associated with SI beyond self-blame and other covariates. Contrary to Study 1, the form of the interaction was such that SI was highest for those high in both self-disgust and societal-disgust. Significant findings were cross-sectional; thus, future research should longitudinally test brief intervals (e.g., hours to days) to better understand these associations. These studies provide some evidence that self-blame and self-disgust, more so than otherblame and societal-disgust, may be risk factors for SI in clinical and sexual minority groups.

弱势群体内部和外部形式的指责和厌恶及其与自杀意念的关系。
弱势群体的自杀风险上升。我们在两项研究中考察了两种形式的内化(即自责、自我厌恶)和外化(即他人指责、社会厌恶)及其与自杀意念(SI)的关系。在研究1 (n = 967)中,患有情绪和/或焦虑症的参与者在入院和出院时完成了自我自责、他人自责和SI的自我报告测量。研究2 (n = 295)在性少数样本中调查了类似的结构,并增加了协变量,包括内化同性恋恐惧症、同性恋恐惧症经历、感知负担和挫败归属感。在研究1中,入院和出院时的自我责备与SI显著相关,而入院或出院时的他人责备与SI显著相关。此外,他们在离职时的相互作用是显著的,因此自责程度高而他人责备程度低的人的SI最高。纵向上,入院时的责备形式与出院时的SI无关,两者的相互作用也无关。在研究2中,自我厌恶、社会厌恶及其交互作用除自责和其他协变量外,显著与SI相关。与研究1相反,相互作用的形式是这样的,自我厌恶和社会厌恶都高的人的SI最高。显著的发现是横断面的;因此,未来的研究应该纵向测试短时间间隔(例如,小时到天),以更好地了解这些关联。这些研究提供了一些证据,证明自责和自我厌恶比其他自责和社会厌恶更可能是临床和性少数群体发生SI的危险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信