From basin to gulf: Conservation tillage improves soil health but exacerbates hypoxia.

NPJ sustainable agriculture Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-28 DOI:10.1038/s44264-025-00090-0
Kang Liang, Xuesong Zhang, Gregory W McCarty, Kaiguang Zhao, Feng Gao
{"title":"From basin to gulf: Conservation tillage improves soil health but exacerbates hypoxia.","authors":"Kang Liang, Xuesong Zhang, Gregory W McCarty, Kaiguang Zhao, Feng Gao","doi":"10.1038/s44264-025-00090-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Agricultural management practices such as conservation tillage is promoted in the U.S. Midwest for improving soil health, mitigating nutrient loss, and reducing hypoxia in the Gulf of America (GOA). However, large-scale evaluations of tillage impact on soil organic carbon (SOC), water quality, and the implications for hypoxia in the Gulf are lacking. By combining a meta-analysis of field experiments with watershed modelling, this study finds that by 2050, no-till (NT) farming could enhance SOC by ~5.4 MgC ha<sup>-</sup> <sup>1</sup>, increase streamflow by 17.3%, and reduce soil erosion by ~4.9%, compared to high-intensity tillage (HT). However, widespread NT adoption could raise nitrogen loss, thus expand summer hypoxia of the GOA to 16,500 km², 21.5% larger than the HT scenario. Despite its soil health benefits, conservation tillage may complicate efforts to reduce hypoxic zones to the targeted 5000 km² by 2035. These tradeoffs underscore the need for balanced approaches in future conservation strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":520846,"journal":{"name":"NPJ sustainable agriculture","volume":"3 1","pages":"47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12394069/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ sustainable agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s44264-025-00090-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Agricultural management practices such as conservation tillage is promoted in the U.S. Midwest for improving soil health, mitigating nutrient loss, and reducing hypoxia in the Gulf of America (GOA). However, large-scale evaluations of tillage impact on soil organic carbon (SOC), water quality, and the implications for hypoxia in the Gulf are lacking. By combining a meta-analysis of field experiments with watershed modelling, this study finds that by 2050, no-till (NT) farming could enhance SOC by ~5.4 MgC ha- 1, increase streamflow by 17.3%, and reduce soil erosion by ~4.9%, compared to high-intensity tillage (HT). However, widespread NT adoption could raise nitrogen loss, thus expand summer hypoxia of the GOA to 16,500 km², 21.5% larger than the HT scenario. Despite its soil health benefits, conservation tillage may complicate efforts to reduce hypoxic zones to the targeted 5000 km² by 2035. These tradeoffs underscore the need for balanced approaches in future conservation strategies.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

从盆地到海湾:保护性耕作改善了土壤健康,但加剧了缺氧。
保护性耕作等农业管理实践在美国中西部推广,以改善土壤健康,减轻营养流失,并减少美洲湾(GOA)的缺氧。然而,目前还缺乏大规模评估耕作对海湾地区土壤有机碳(SOC)、水质和缺氧影响的研究。通过将田间试验与流域模型相结合的荟萃分析,本研究发现,到2050年,与高强度耕作(HT)相比,免耕(NT)耕作可使土壤有机碳增加~5.4 MgC ha- 1,增加河流流量17.3%,减少土壤侵蚀~4.9%。然而,广泛采用NT可能会增加氮的损失,从而将果阿夏季缺氧扩大到16,500 km²,比高温情景大21.5%。尽管保护性耕作对土壤健康有益,但它可能会使到2035年将缺氧区减少到5000平方公里的目标复杂化。这些权衡强调了在未来的保护策略中采取平衡方法的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信