High-Precision Hemodynamic and Echocardiographic Assessment of Pacing in Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.

IF 1.3
Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-21 DOI:10.1111/pace.70024
Jagdeep S Mohal, Matthew J Shun-Shin, Kayla Chiew, Alejandra A Miyazawa, Florentina Simader, Pannathorn Tangkongpanich, Rahul Bahl, Ji-Jian Chow, James P Howard, Akriti Naraen, Keenan Saleh, Jack W Samways, Daniel Keene, S M Afzal Sohaib, Mark Tanner, Kevin M W Leong, Norman A Qureshi, David C Lefroy, Prapa Kanagaratnam, Darrel P Francis, Amanda Varnava, Zachary I Whinnett, Ahran D Arnold
{"title":"High-Precision Hemodynamic and Echocardiographic Assessment of Pacing in Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.","authors":"Jagdeep S Mohal, Matthew J Shun-Shin, Kayla Chiew, Alejandra A Miyazawa, Florentina Simader, Pannathorn Tangkongpanich, Rahul Bahl, Ji-Jian Chow, James P Howard, Akriti Naraen, Keenan Saleh, Jack W Samways, Daniel Keene, S M Afzal Sohaib, Mark Tanner, Kevin M W Leong, Norman A Qureshi, David C Lefroy, Prapa Kanagaratnam, Darrel P Francis, Amanda Varnava, Zachary I Whinnett, Ahran D Arnold","doi":"10.1111/pace.70024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Left ventricular outflow obstruction drives symptoms and outcomes in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM). Right ventricular pacing (RVP) can desynchronize the left ventricle to relieve this and allows control of atrioventricular delay (AVD) but may impair ventricular function. We used high-precision assessment to quantify the hemodynamic and echocardiographic effects of RVP in oHCM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with oHCM and implanted dual-chamber pacing devices underwent continuous recording of ECG, beat-by-beat outflow tract continuous wave Doppler, and beat-by-beat, noninvasive finger-cuff blood pressure while pacing was alternated between atrium-only pacing and AV-sequential RVP at a range of AVDs at 5 bpm above resting heart rate and 100 bpm. Changes in systolic blood pressure (∆SBP) and left ventricular outflow tract gradient (∆LVOTg) were fitted to parabolas to produce reproducible, narrow confidence interval estimates of effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty two patients were recruited (60% male, mean resting LVOTg 53 mmHg). At just above resting heart rate (mean 75 bpm), RVP produced mean peak ∆SBP from AAI to DDD of 2.47 mmHg (95% confidence interval: 0.19-4.76, p = 0.04). The mean AVD for peak ∆SBP was 173.2 ms. Mean LVOTg reduction at this AVD was 8.31 mmHg (2.43-14.18, p < 0.001). Apart from the hemodynamically optimum AVD, no other AVDs produced statistically significant increases in SBP. At 100 bpm, greater increases in SBP and reductions in LVOTg were seen at hemodynamically optimal AVD.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Multiple alternation assessment allows precise, reproducible, narrow confidence interval quantification of hemodynamic and echocardiographic pacing effects. RVP can reduce LVOTg while preserving or improving cardiac output, but AVD is a key modifier of this relationship.</p>","PeriodicalId":520740,"journal":{"name":"Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE","volume":" ","pages":"1138-1147"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.70024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Left ventricular outflow obstruction drives symptoms and outcomes in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM). Right ventricular pacing (RVP) can desynchronize the left ventricle to relieve this and allows control of atrioventricular delay (AVD) but may impair ventricular function. We used high-precision assessment to quantify the hemodynamic and echocardiographic effects of RVP in oHCM.

Methods: Patients with oHCM and implanted dual-chamber pacing devices underwent continuous recording of ECG, beat-by-beat outflow tract continuous wave Doppler, and beat-by-beat, noninvasive finger-cuff blood pressure while pacing was alternated between atrium-only pacing and AV-sequential RVP at a range of AVDs at 5 bpm above resting heart rate and 100 bpm. Changes in systolic blood pressure (∆SBP) and left ventricular outflow tract gradient (∆LVOTg) were fitted to parabolas to produce reproducible, narrow confidence interval estimates of effects.

Results: Twenty two patients were recruited (60% male, mean resting LVOTg 53 mmHg). At just above resting heart rate (mean 75 bpm), RVP produced mean peak ∆SBP from AAI to DDD of 2.47 mmHg (95% confidence interval: 0.19-4.76, p = 0.04). The mean AVD for peak ∆SBP was 173.2 ms. Mean LVOTg reduction at this AVD was 8.31 mmHg (2.43-14.18, p < 0.001). Apart from the hemodynamically optimum AVD, no other AVDs produced statistically significant increases in SBP. At 100 bpm, greater increases in SBP and reductions in LVOTg were seen at hemodynamically optimal AVD.

Conclusion: Multiple alternation assessment allows precise, reproducible, narrow confidence interval quantification of hemodynamic and echocardiographic pacing effects. RVP can reduce LVOTg while preserving or improving cardiac output, but AVD is a key modifier of this relationship.

阻塞性肥厚性心肌病起搏的高精度血流动力学和超声心动图评价。
背景:左心室流出梗阻驱动梗阻性肥厚性心肌病(oHCM)的症状和结局。右心室起搏(RVP)可以使左心室去同步化以缓解这种情况,并允许控制房室延迟(AVD),但可能损害心室功能。我们使用高精度评估来量化oHCM中RVP的血流动力学和超声心动图效应。方法:植入双室起搏器的oHCM患者连续记录心电图、流出道连续波多普勒和无创指袖血压,同时在静息心率以上5bpm和100bpm的avd范围内,在单心房起搏和av序贯RVP之间交替起搏。收缩压(∆SBP)和左心室流出道梯度(∆LVOTg)的变化拟合成抛物线,以产生可重复的、窄置信区间的效果估计。结果:共纳入22例患者(60%为男性,平均静息LVOTg 53 mmHg)。在稍高于静息心率(平均75 bpm)时,从AAI到DDD, RVP产生的平均峰值∆收缩压为2.47 mmHg(95%置信区间:0.19-4.76,p = 0.04)。峰值∆SBP的平均AVD为173.2 ms。AVD组平均LVOTg降低8.31 mmHg (2.43 ~ 14.18, p < 0.001)。除了血流动力学最佳的AVD外,其他AVD均未产生统计学上显著的收缩压升高。在100 bpm时,血流动力学最佳AVD的收缩压增加幅度更大,LVOTg降低幅度更大。结论:多次交替评估可精确、可重复、窄置信区间量化血流动力学和超声心动图起搏效应。RVP可以降低LVOTg,同时保持或改善心输出量,但AVD是这一关系的关键调节因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信