Low-Dose Chest CT-Participating in the Rise of Breast Density Awareness.

Lauren J Lentini, Sydney T Woode, Laurie Margolies, Rowena Yip, Claudia I Henschke, David F Yankelevitz
{"title":"Low-Dose Chest CT-Participating in the Rise of Breast Density Awareness.","authors":"Lauren J Lentini, Sydney T Woode, Laurie Margolies, Rowena Yip, Claudia I Henschke, David F Yankelevitz","doi":"10.1177/15409996251372349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> There is a strong correlation between CT and mammographic assessment of breast density. The purpose of this study was to assess whether women enrolled in the low-dose CT (LDCT) scan lung cancer screening program and had dense breasts on their CT scan were aware of their breast density, to confirm the correlation of CT and mammographic breast density, and to determine the utilization rates of supplemental screening. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Participants were English-speaking women with dense breasts identified on LDCT done through the International Early Lung Cancer Action Program (I-ELCAP). All signed consent. Participants completed the I-ELCAP Dense Breast Questionnaire addressing patients' awareness and knowledge of breast density. Mammogram reports in the electronic medical record were analyzed for breast density category. Discrepant cases, i.e., where mammogram and LDCT dense breast density categories differed, were reviewed by an expert radiologist. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Most patients, 78/88 (89%), knew they had dense breasts. More than half of the participants, 56/88 (64%), did not receive additional testing. The CT and mammogram reported density was concordant in 52/60 (87%) of cases. All the discordant cases differed by one category-the mammograms were reported as having \"scattered fibroglandular elements.\" Re-review of mammograms confirmed they were not dense in 5/8, and images were not available for 3/8. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The lack of additional testing in those with documented dense breasts suggests weak adherence to recommendations and the potential for enhanced education about the potential benefits of supplemental screening. Additional education concerning breast density determination on CT relative to mammography may be useful.</p>","PeriodicalId":520699,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health (2002)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of women's health (2002)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15409996251372349","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: There is a strong correlation between CT and mammographic assessment of breast density. The purpose of this study was to assess whether women enrolled in the low-dose CT (LDCT) scan lung cancer screening program and had dense breasts on their CT scan were aware of their breast density, to confirm the correlation of CT and mammographic breast density, and to determine the utilization rates of supplemental screening. Methods: Participants were English-speaking women with dense breasts identified on LDCT done through the International Early Lung Cancer Action Program (I-ELCAP). All signed consent. Participants completed the I-ELCAP Dense Breast Questionnaire addressing patients' awareness and knowledge of breast density. Mammogram reports in the electronic medical record were analyzed for breast density category. Discrepant cases, i.e., where mammogram and LDCT dense breast density categories differed, were reviewed by an expert radiologist. Results: Most patients, 78/88 (89%), knew they had dense breasts. More than half of the participants, 56/88 (64%), did not receive additional testing. The CT and mammogram reported density was concordant in 52/60 (87%) of cases. All the discordant cases differed by one category-the mammograms were reported as having "scattered fibroglandular elements." Re-review of mammograms confirmed they were not dense in 5/8, and images were not available for 3/8. Conclusion: The lack of additional testing in those with documented dense breasts suggests weak adherence to recommendations and the potential for enhanced education about the potential benefits of supplemental screening. Additional education concerning breast density determination on CT relative to mammography may be useful.

低剂量胸部ct参与提高乳腺密度意识。
CT和乳房x线摄影对乳腺密度的评估有很强的相关性。本研究的目的是评估参加低剂量CT (LDCT)扫描肺癌筛查项目且CT扫描上乳房致密的女性是否意识到自己的乳房密度,以确认CT和乳房x线摄影乳房密度的相关性,并确定补充筛查的利用率。方法:参与者是通过国际早期肺癌行动计划(I-ELCAP)进行的LDCT发现的致密性乳房的英语女性。所有人都签了同意书。参与者完成了I-ELCAP乳腺密度调查问卷,以了解患者对乳腺密度的认识和知识。对电子病历中的乳房x光检查报告进行乳腺密度分类分析。不一致的病例,即乳房x光检查和LDCT致密乳腺密度类别不同,由放射科专家进行审查。结果:大多数患者(78/88)(89%)知道自己有致密性乳房。超过一半的参与者,56/88(64%),没有接受额外的测试。52/60(87%)病例的CT和乳房x线摄影报告的密度一致。所有不一致的病例都有一个不同的分类——乳房x光片被报道为“分散的纤维腺元素”。复查乳房x光片证实5/8未见致密,3/8未见图像。结论:在有记录的致密性乳房患者中缺乏额外的检查表明对建议的依从性较弱,并且有可能加强关于补充筛查潜在益处的教育。与乳房x光检查相比,CT检查乳腺密度的额外教育可能是有用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信