Various surgical techniques result in different outcomes for full extensor mechanism ruptures following total knee replacement: A systematic review by the European Knee Associates (ESSKA-EKA).

IF 5
Bruno Violante, Riccardo Compagnoni, Artur Kroell, Michael Engl, Octav Russu, George Mihai Avram, Sarper Gursu, Elvire Servien, Francesco Puglia, Pietro Simone Randelli, Reha Tandogan, Michael T Hirschmann
{"title":"Various surgical techniques result in different outcomes for full extensor mechanism ruptures following total knee replacement: A systematic review by the European Knee Associates (ESSKA-EKA).","authors":"Bruno Violante, Riccardo Compagnoni, Artur Kroell, Michael Engl, Octav Russu, George Mihai Avram, Sarper Gursu, Elvire Servien, Francesco Puglia, Pietro Simone Randelli, Reha Tandogan, Michael T Hirschmann","doi":"10.1002/ksa.70015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Extensor mechanism (EM) ruptures after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are rare but lead to substantial functional impairment and morbidity. Treatment remains challenging due to the diversity of surgical techniques and the limited number of comparative studies. The European Knee Associates (EKA) group conducted a systematic review to evaluate available treatments for EM rupture following primary TKA, assess outcomes such as extensor lag, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and walking status, and to identify prevailing trends and complication rates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022341591) and conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis and Cochrane guidelines. PubMed/Medline and Scopus databases were searched for clinical studies published between 2014 and 2024 reporting outcomes after EM repair in TKA patients. Inclusion criteria encompassed retrospective and prospective studies in English or German. Studies on EM ruptures due to infection, revision TKA, or patellectomy were excluded. Data extraction included demographics, time-to-reconstruction, repair type, extensor lag, PROMs and walking status. Due to heterogeneity, a meta-analysis was not feasible, and results were descriptively reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 32 studies comprising 893 EM rupture cases were included. The mean patient age was 66.8 years (standard deviation [SD] ± 7.4), with a mean body mass index of 34.5 (SD ± 6.2). Patellar tendon ruptures (39%) were the most frequent. Nine different surgical techniques were identified, including allografts, synthetic meshes, autografts and direct repairs. The overall complication rate was 16%, with autografts having the highest complication rate (38%). All repair techniques led to improvements in extensor lag and post-operative Knee Society Scores exceeding the minimal clinically important difference thresholds. However, walking status and PROMs were inconsistently reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EM failure after TKA remains a complex complication with variable outcomes depending on treatment strategy. Standardization of surgical techniques and outcome measures, along with multicenter collaborations, is crucial to improve future patient care as the number of TKA procedures continues to rise.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III, systematic review of Level III studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":520702,"journal":{"name":"Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.70015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Extensor mechanism (EM) ruptures after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are rare but lead to substantial functional impairment and morbidity. Treatment remains challenging due to the diversity of surgical techniques and the limited number of comparative studies. The European Knee Associates (EKA) group conducted a systematic review to evaluate available treatments for EM rupture following primary TKA, assess outcomes such as extensor lag, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and walking status, and to identify prevailing trends and complication rates.

Methods: A systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022341591) and conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis and Cochrane guidelines. PubMed/Medline and Scopus databases were searched for clinical studies published between 2014 and 2024 reporting outcomes after EM repair in TKA patients. Inclusion criteria encompassed retrospective and prospective studies in English or German. Studies on EM ruptures due to infection, revision TKA, or patellectomy were excluded. Data extraction included demographics, time-to-reconstruction, repair type, extensor lag, PROMs and walking status. Due to heterogeneity, a meta-analysis was not feasible, and results were descriptively reported.

Results: A total of 32 studies comprising 893 EM rupture cases were included. The mean patient age was 66.8 years (standard deviation [SD] ± 7.4), with a mean body mass index of 34.5 (SD ± 6.2). Patellar tendon ruptures (39%) were the most frequent. Nine different surgical techniques were identified, including allografts, synthetic meshes, autografts and direct repairs. The overall complication rate was 16%, with autografts having the highest complication rate (38%). All repair techniques led to improvements in extensor lag and post-operative Knee Society Scores exceeding the minimal clinically important difference thresholds. However, walking status and PROMs were inconsistently reported.

Conclusions: EM failure after TKA remains a complex complication with variable outcomes depending on treatment strategy. Standardization of surgical techniques and outcome measures, along with multicenter collaborations, is crucial to improve future patient care as the number of TKA procedures continues to rise.

Level of evidence: Level III, systematic review of Level III studies.

欧洲膝关节协会(ESSKA-EKA)的一项系统综述:全膝关节置换术后,不同的手术技术会导致不同的结果。
目的:全膝关节置换术(TKA)后伸肌机制(EM)破裂是罕见的,但会导致严重的功能损害和发病率。由于手术技术的多样性和比较研究的数量有限,治疗仍然具有挑战性。欧洲膝关节协会(EKA)小组进行了一项系统综述,以评估原发性TKA后EM破裂的可用治疗方法,评估伸肌滞后、患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)和行走状态等结果,并确定主要趋势和并发症发生率。方法:在PROSPERO (CRD42022341591)中注册了一项系统评价,并根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目和Cochrane指南进行了系统评价。检索PubMed/Medline和Scopus数据库,检索2014年至2024年间发表的关于TKA患者EM修复后结果的临床研究。纳入标准包括英语或德语的回顾性和前瞻性研究。由于感染、改良TKA或髌骨切除术导致的EM破裂的研究被排除在外。数据提取包括人口统计、重建时间、修复类型、伸肌滞后、prom和行走状态。由于异质性,荟萃分析是不可行的,结果是描述性报告。结果:共纳入32项研究,包括893例EM破裂病例。患者平均年龄66.8岁(标准差[SD]±7.4),平均体重指数34.5 (SD±6.2)。髌骨肌腱断裂(39%)最为常见。确定了九种不同的手术技术,包括同种异体移植、合成补片、自体移植和直接修复。总并发症发生率为16%,自体移植物并发症发生率最高(38%)。所有修复技术导致伸肌迟滞和术后膝关节社会评分的改善超过了最小临床重要差异阈值。然而,行走状态和PROMs的报告不一致。结论:TKA后EM失效仍然是一个复杂的并发症,其结果取决于治疗策略。随着TKA手术数量的不断增加,手术技术和结果测量的标准化以及多中心合作对于改善未来患者护理至关重要。证据等级:III级,III级研究的系统评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信