Intracardiac echocardiography for left ventricular diastolic function assessment during atrial fibrillation ablation.

IF 2.6
Jian Liang Tan, Julio Chirinos, Darshak Patel, Dinesh Jagasia, Matthew C Hyman, Gustavo S Guandalini, Saman Nazarian, David Lin, Gregory Supple, David S Frankel, David J Callans, Francis E Marchlinski, Jian-Fang Ren, Timothy M Markman
{"title":"Intracardiac echocardiography for left ventricular diastolic function assessment during atrial fibrillation ablation.","authors":"Jian Liang Tan, Julio Chirinos, Darshak Patel, Dinesh Jagasia, Matthew C Hyman, Gustavo S Guandalini, Saman Nazarian, David Lin, Gregory Supple, David S Frankel, David J Callans, Francis E Marchlinski, Jian-Fang Ren, Timothy M Markman","doi":"10.1007/s10840-025-02110-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction is associated with the development of atrial fibrillation (AF) and risk of recurrence after ablation. The use of an intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) for diastolic function assessment during ablation procedures has not been evaluated.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the feasibility and utility of ICE obtained measures of LV diastolic function including peak tricuspid regurgitation velocity, trans-mitral flow velocity, mitral annular tissue Doppler velocities, and pulmonary vein flow velocities in patients undergoing AF ablation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a single-center, prospective evaluation of patients undergoing AF ablation between 2022 and 2024. During sinus rhythm, diastolic parameters were measured with the ICE catheter and direct left atrial pressure (LAP) was recorded prior to AF ablation. Elevated LAP was defined as ≥ 12 mmHg. ICE measured diastolic parameters were compared with those measured on transthoracic echocardiography (TTE).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 152 patients (53% male, 69 ± 12 years old, mean CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASc score of 3 ± 2) were analyzed, of which 80 had normal LAP (< 12 mmHg) by direct measurement. Several ICE parameters were found to be significantly associated with mean LAP, including greater peak tricuspid regurgitation velocity (β = 3.5; p = 0.005) and average E/e' (β = 0.7; p < 0.001). In multivariable model, post-procedure intravenous diuretics were more commonly required in patients with abnormal diastolic function by ICE (mitral E/A OR = 8.1; average E/e' OR = 24.2).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ICE can be used to assess diastolic function with traditional parameters correlating with both TTE diastolic function and LAP. ICE measures of restrictive filling are associated with the need for post-procedural intravenous diuretics.</p>","PeriodicalId":520675,"journal":{"name":"Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-025-02110-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction is associated with the development of atrial fibrillation (AF) and risk of recurrence after ablation. The use of an intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) for diastolic function assessment during ablation procedures has not been evaluated.

Objectives: To evaluate the feasibility and utility of ICE obtained measures of LV diastolic function including peak tricuspid regurgitation velocity, trans-mitral flow velocity, mitral annular tissue Doppler velocities, and pulmonary vein flow velocities in patients undergoing AF ablation.

Methods: We conducted a single-center, prospective evaluation of patients undergoing AF ablation between 2022 and 2024. During sinus rhythm, diastolic parameters were measured with the ICE catheter and direct left atrial pressure (LAP) was recorded prior to AF ablation. Elevated LAP was defined as ≥ 12 mmHg. ICE measured diastolic parameters were compared with those measured on transthoracic echocardiography (TTE).

Results: A total of 152 patients (53% male, 69 ± 12 years old, mean CHA2DS2-VASc score of 3 ± 2) were analyzed, of which 80 had normal LAP (< 12 mmHg) by direct measurement. Several ICE parameters were found to be significantly associated with mean LAP, including greater peak tricuspid regurgitation velocity (β = 3.5; p = 0.005) and average E/e' (β = 0.7; p < 0.001). In multivariable model, post-procedure intravenous diuretics were more commonly required in patients with abnormal diastolic function by ICE (mitral E/A OR = 8.1; average E/e' OR = 24.2).

Conclusions: ICE can be used to assess diastolic function with traditional parameters correlating with both TTE diastolic function and LAP. ICE measures of restrictive filling are associated with the need for post-procedural intravenous diuretics.

心房颤动消融过程中左室舒张功能的超声心动图评价。
背景:左室(LV)舒张功能障碍与心房颤动(AF)的发展和消融后复发的风险相关。在消融过程中,使用心内超声心动图(ICE)评估舒张功能尚未得到评估。目的:评价ICE测量心房颤动消融患者左室舒张功能的可行性和实用性,包括三尖瓣峰值反流速度、经二尖瓣血流速度、二尖瓣环组织多普勒速度和肺静脉血流速度。方法:我们对2022年至2024年间接受房颤消融的患者进行了单中心前瞻性评估。在窦性心律期间,使用ICE导管测量舒张参数,并在房颤消融前记录直接左心房压(LAP)。LAP升高定义为≥12 mmHg。将ICE测量的舒张参数与经胸超声心动图(TTE)测量的舒张参数进行比较。结果:共分析152例患者(男性53%,69±12岁,CHA2DS2-VASc平均评分3±2),其中LAP正常的患者80例(结论:传统参数与TTE舒张功能和LAP均相关,ICE可用于评估舒张功能。限制性填充物的ICE措施与术后静脉利尿剂的需要有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信