The Effects of Multimodal Sensory Interventions on the Behavioral States and Feeding Outcomes in Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

IF 1.6
Ting Tu, Hongqing Guo, Ying Yuan, Lan Hu
{"title":"The Effects of Multimodal Sensory Interventions on the Behavioral States and Feeding Outcomes in Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Ting Tu, Hongqing Guo, Ying Yuan, Lan Hu","doi":"10.1097/ANC.0000000000001287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multimodal sensory interventions generally facilitate oral feeding in preterm infants. However, variability exists in forms of interventions, leading to inconsistent effects.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim is to evaluate the effectiveness of multimodal sensory interventions on behavioral states and feeding outcomes in preterm infants.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Five databases were reviewed from inception of databases to April 2025.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Randomized controlled trials of multimodal sensory interventions examining feeding outcomes and behavioral states were enrolled. Multimodal interventions were defined as combinations of different unimodal sensory stimuli.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Two independent reviewers evaluated the risk of bias and extracted relevant data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty studies involving 4 multimodal intervention groups were identified: tactile-kinesthetic stimulation (TKS), TKS combined with oral stimulation, auditory-tactile-visual-vestibular intervention (ATVV), and a combined oral and another unimodal stimulation. TKS increased weight gain and decreased length of stay compared to standard care, but showed no advantage over uni-tactile stimulation. Combined oral with another unimodal stimulation accelerated transition time and increased feeding volume. ATVV and a combined tactile-kinesthetic and oral stimulation showed no significant effects on oral feeding outcomes. Effects on behavioral states were unclear. Frequency, duration, and caregiver quality also impacted effects.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice and research: </strong>TKS and a combined oral and another unimodal stimulation may enhance feeding outcomes, including weight gain, feeding volume, length of stay, and transition time. The potential effects on behavioral states remain unclear. More high-quality studies are necessary to further validate the effects of variable forms of interventions on behavioral states and feeding outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":520547,"journal":{"name":"Advances in neonatal care : official journal of the National Association of Neonatal Nurses","volume":" ","pages":"465-479"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in neonatal care : official journal of the National Association of Neonatal Nurses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ANC.0000000000001287","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Multimodal sensory interventions generally facilitate oral feeding in preterm infants. However, variability exists in forms of interventions, leading to inconsistent effects.

Purpose: The aim is to evaluate the effectiveness of multimodal sensory interventions on behavioral states and feeding outcomes in preterm infants.

Data sources: Five databases were reviewed from inception of databases to April 2025.

Study selection: Randomized controlled trials of multimodal sensory interventions examining feeding outcomes and behavioral states were enrolled. Multimodal interventions were defined as combinations of different unimodal sensory stimuli.

Data extraction: Two independent reviewers evaluated the risk of bias and extracted relevant data.

Results: Thirty studies involving 4 multimodal intervention groups were identified: tactile-kinesthetic stimulation (TKS), TKS combined with oral stimulation, auditory-tactile-visual-vestibular intervention (ATVV), and a combined oral and another unimodal stimulation. TKS increased weight gain and decreased length of stay compared to standard care, but showed no advantage over uni-tactile stimulation. Combined oral with another unimodal stimulation accelerated transition time and increased feeding volume. ATVV and a combined tactile-kinesthetic and oral stimulation showed no significant effects on oral feeding outcomes. Effects on behavioral states were unclear. Frequency, duration, and caregiver quality also impacted effects.

Implications for practice and research: TKS and a combined oral and another unimodal stimulation may enhance feeding outcomes, including weight gain, feeding volume, length of stay, and transition time. The potential effects on behavioral states remain unclear. More high-quality studies are necessary to further validate the effects of variable forms of interventions on behavioral states and feeding outcomes.

多模式感觉干预对早产儿行为状态和喂养结果的影响:一项系统综述和meta分析。
背景:多模式感觉干预通常有助于早产儿的口服喂养。然而,干预措施的形式存在可变性,导致效果不一致。目的:评价多模式感觉干预对早产儿行为状态和喂养结果的影响。数据来源:从数据库建立到2025年4月审查了五个数据库。研究选择:纳入了多模式感官干预检查喂养结果和行为状态的随机对照试验。多模态干预被定义为不同单模态感觉刺激的组合。数据提取:两名独立审稿人评估偏倚风险并提取相关数据。结果:30项研究涉及4个多模态干预组:触觉-动觉刺激(TKS)、TKS联合口腔刺激、听觉-触觉-视觉-前庭干预(ATVV)、口腔和另一种单模态联合刺激。与标准护理相比,TKS增加了体重增加,缩短了住院时间,但与单触觉刺激相比没有优势。口服与另一种单峰刺激联合使用加速了过渡时间并增加了喂养量。ATVV和触觉-动觉和口腔联合刺激对口腔喂养结果没有显著影响。对行为状态的影响尚不清楚。频率、持续时间和护理人员的质量也会影响效果。对实践和研究的启示:TKS和联合口服和另一种单峰刺激可能会改善喂养结果,包括体重增加、喂养量、停留时间和过渡时间。对行为状态的潜在影响尚不清楚。需要更多高质量的研究来进一步验证不同形式的干预对行为状态和喂养结果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信