Comparison of the analgesic effects of the erector spinae plane block and thoracic paravertebral block in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.

Remziye Sıvacı, Bilal Atilla Bezen, Elif Doğan Bakı, Gürhan Öz
{"title":"Comparison of the analgesic effects of the erector spinae plane block and thoracic paravertebral block in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.","authors":"Remziye Sıvacı, Bilal Atilla Bezen, Elif Doğan Bakı, Gürhan Öz","doi":"10.14744/agri.2025.15689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the effects of paravertebral block (PVB) and erector spinae plane block (ESPB) on intraoperative and postoperative analgesia and pulmonary function in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 49 patients aged 18-70 years with ASA scores of 2-3 who underwent elective VATS were included in the study. Patients were randomized into two groups using a web-based system. Those who received thoracic PVB were assigned to Group I, and those who received ESPB to Group II. Patients were monitored using the surgical plethysmographic index and bispectral index during the intraoperative period. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative blood gas samples were analyzed to assess the impact on pulmonary function. Block application time, intraoperative and postoperative analgesic consumption, the presence of block-related complications, and length of hospital stay were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of intraoperative and postoperative analgesic consumption, operation time, or length of hospital stay (p>0.05). Postoperative VAS scores were similar, and there was no significant difference in preoperative, intraoperative, or postoperative arterial blood gas values between the two groups (p>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ESPB is as effective as PVB in controlling acute postoperative pain and is easier to perform.</p>","PeriodicalId":101341,"journal":{"name":"Agri : Agri (Algoloji) Dernegi'nin Yayin organidir = The journal of the Turkish Society of Algology","volume":"37 3","pages":"135-141"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agri : Agri (Algoloji) Dernegi'nin Yayin organidir = The journal of the Turkish Society of Algology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/agri.2025.15689","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the effects of paravertebral block (PVB) and erector spinae plane block (ESPB) on intraoperative and postoperative analgesia and pulmonary function in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS).

Methods: A total of 49 patients aged 18-70 years with ASA scores of 2-3 who underwent elective VATS were included in the study. Patients were randomized into two groups using a web-based system. Those who received thoracic PVB were assigned to Group I, and those who received ESPB to Group II. Patients were monitored using the surgical plethysmographic index and bispectral index during the intraoperative period. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative blood gas samples were analyzed to assess the impact on pulmonary function. Block application time, intraoperative and postoperative analgesic consumption, the presence of block-related complications, and length of hospital stay were recorded.

Results: There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of intraoperative and postoperative analgesic consumption, operation time, or length of hospital stay (p>0.05). Postoperative VAS scores were similar, and there was no significant difference in preoperative, intraoperative, or postoperative arterial blood gas values between the two groups (p>0.05).

Conclusion: ESPB is as effective as PVB in controlling acute postoperative pain and is easier to perform.

竖脊肌平面阻滞与胸椎旁阻滞在胸腔镜手术中的镇痛效果比较。
目的:比较椎旁阻滞(PVB)和竖棘平面阻滞(ESPB)对胸腔镜手术(VATS)患者术中、术后镇痛及肺功能的影响。方法:49例年龄18-70岁,ASA评分2-3分的择期VATS患者纳入研究。使用基于网络的系统将患者随机分为两组。接受胸椎PVB的患者被分为第一组,接受ESPB的患者被分为第二组。术中采用手术体积描记指数和双谱指数对患者进行监测。分析术前、术中、术后血气样本以评估对肺功能的影响。记录阻滞应用时间、术中和术后镇痛药消耗、阻滞相关并发症的存在以及住院时间。结果:两组患者术中、术后镇痛药用量、手术时间、住院时间差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。两组患者术后VAS评分相似,术前、术中、术后动脉血气值差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。结论:ESPB与PVB对术后急性疼痛的控制效果相同,且更易于操作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信