An AI-Based Solution for Denoising Fast-Acquisition [18F]FDG PET: Clinical Feasibility and Quantitative Assessment.

Luísa C Silva, Cláudia S Constantino, Ricardo Teixeira, Joana C Castanheira, Francisco P M Oliveira, Durval C Costa
{"title":"An AI-Based Solution for Denoising Fast-Acquisition [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET: Clinical Feasibility and Quantitative Assessment.","authors":"Luísa C Silva, Cláudia S Constantino, Ricardo Teixeira, Joana C Castanheira, Francisco P M Oliveira, Durval C Costa","doi":"10.1007/s10278-025-01638-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Benefits in patient comfort, efficiency, and sustainability can come from reducing positron emission tomography (PET) scan's acquisition duration. This study assesses the clinical adequacy of restoring fast-acquisition <sup>18</sup>F-fluorodeoxyglucose ([<sup>18</sup>F]FDG) PET to its standard-of-care image quality through deep-learning-based (DL) methods. Fast and standard whole-body [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET acquisitions of 117 oncological patients were included in the training and testing of three convolutional neural networks. The best-performing network during training was chosen for clinical evaluation on the test set (N = 25). Visual assessment and lesion detectability of the fast acquisitions, of 20 and 30 seconds per axial field of view (s/AFOV), with and without DL-based denoising, and of the local standard of care, of 70 s/AFOV, were performed by three experienced nuclear medicine physicians. Quantification was conducted globally (voxel-wise), in healthy organs and the reported lesions. Optimised Gaussian and non-local means filters served as benchmarks. Visual assessment revealed 20 and 30 s/AFOV with DL-based denoising to have similar image quality to the standard of care. Average lesion-based sensitivity and positive predictive value were 74% and 72%, respectively, for 20 s/AFOV + DL and 72% and 80% for 30 s/AFOV + DL. DL-based denoising displayed the highest voxel-wise agreement with the standard-of-care (p < 0.001). Liver and lungs in the DL-denoised images exhibited a higher signal-to-noise ratio than the standard of care. The median absolute maximum standardised uptake value deviation in the lesions was as low as 0.39 for 20 s/AFOV + DL and 0.30 for 30 s/AFOV + DL. The proposed DL-based method proved to be suitable for the restoration of fast-acquisition whole-body [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET, having resulted in images similar to the standard-of-care acquisitions. DL-based denoising outperformed standard benchmark methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":516858,"journal":{"name":"Journal of imaging informatics in medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of imaging informatics in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-025-01638-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Benefits in patient comfort, efficiency, and sustainability can come from reducing positron emission tomography (PET) scan's acquisition duration. This study assesses the clinical adequacy of restoring fast-acquisition 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) PET to its standard-of-care image quality through deep-learning-based (DL) methods. Fast and standard whole-body [18F]FDG PET acquisitions of 117 oncological patients were included in the training and testing of three convolutional neural networks. The best-performing network during training was chosen for clinical evaluation on the test set (N = 25). Visual assessment and lesion detectability of the fast acquisitions, of 20 and 30 seconds per axial field of view (s/AFOV), with and without DL-based denoising, and of the local standard of care, of 70 s/AFOV, were performed by three experienced nuclear medicine physicians. Quantification was conducted globally (voxel-wise), in healthy organs and the reported lesions. Optimised Gaussian and non-local means filters served as benchmarks. Visual assessment revealed 20 and 30 s/AFOV with DL-based denoising to have similar image quality to the standard of care. Average lesion-based sensitivity and positive predictive value were 74% and 72%, respectively, for 20 s/AFOV + DL and 72% and 80% for 30 s/AFOV + DL. DL-based denoising displayed the highest voxel-wise agreement with the standard-of-care (p < 0.001). Liver and lungs in the DL-denoised images exhibited a higher signal-to-noise ratio than the standard of care. The median absolute maximum standardised uptake value deviation in the lesions was as low as 0.39 for 20 s/AFOV + DL and 0.30 for 30 s/AFOV + DL. The proposed DL-based method proved to be suitable for the restoration of fast-acquisition whole-body [18F]FDG PET, having resulted in images similar to the standard-of-care acquisitions. DL-based denoising outperformed standard benchmark methods.

一种基于人工智能的快速采集FDG PET去噪方法[18F]:临床可行性与定量评估。
减少正电子发射断层扫描(PET)扫描的采集时间,可以提高患者的舒适度、效率和可持续性。本研究通过基于深度学习(DL)的方法,评估将快速采集的18F-氟脱氧葡萄糖([18F]FDG) PET恢复到其标准护理图像质量的临床充分性。将117例肿瘤患者快速、标准的全身[18F]FDG PET采集纳入三个卷积神经网络的训练和测试。选择训练中表现最好的网络在测试集(N = 25)上进行临床评估。三名经验丰富的核医学医师分别对每轴向视场(s/AFOV) 20秒和30秒的快速采集(s/AFOV),有和没有基于dl的去噪,以及70秒/AFOV的局部护理标准进行视觉评估和病变可检出性。在健康器官和报告的病变中进行全局(体素方向)量化。优化的高斯滤波器和非局部均值滤波器作为基准。视觉评估显示,基于dl去噪的20和30 s/AFOV图像质量与护理标准相似。20 s/AFOV + DL的平均敏感性和阳性预测值分别为74%和72%,30 s/AFOV + DL的平均敏感性和阳性预测值分别为72%和80%。基于dl的去噪显示出最高的体素一致性,与FDG PET的标准处理(p 18F)一致,产生的图像与标准处理的图像相似。基于dl的去噪优于标准基准方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信