Do you Really Want to Know-Patient and Physician Attitudes of Physicians and English-Proficient Asian Patients toward Direct Release of Radiology Reports in Singapore.

David Meng-Guang Chian, Lishya Liauw, Sin Lee Chua, Lai Peng Chan, Tessa Sundaram Cook, Charles Xian-Yang Goh, Winnie Wing Chuen Lam, Wei Ming Chua, Kheng Choon Lim
{"title":"Do you Really Want to Know-Patient and Physician Attitudes of Physicians and English-Proficient Asian Patients toward Direct Release of Radiology Reports in Singapore.","authors":"David Meng-Guang Chian, Lishya Liauw, Sin Lee Chua, Lai Peng Chan, Tessa Sundaram Cook, Charles Xian-Yang Goh, Winnie Wing Chuen Lam, Wei Ming Chua, Kheng Choon Lim","doi":"10.1007/s10278-025-01655-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In Singapore, there are plans to release radiological reports to patients directly, potentially before their physician clinic visits. While several studies have researched this policy in Caucasian-majority populations, there is scarce data for Asian-majority populations. This study aims to understand the perceptions of releasing radiological reports directly to patients before their clinic visit, by surveying physicians and patients at a major tertiary hospital in Singapore. Voluntary surveys were fielded to English-proficient patients who presented for select cross-sectional imaging, as well as physicians working at the hospital between March and July 2024. Statistical analysis was performed using Pearson's χ<sup>2</sup> test and multivariate linear regression with a two-tailed statistical significance value of 0.05. An institutional review board waiver of consent was received. Analyzing 280 physician and 137 patient responses showed significant differences in agreement across all questions (p < 0.0001). Patients favored, and physicians opposed, the direct release of results. Subgroup analysis revealed significant differences (p < 0.05) between tertiary and pre-tertiary educated patients. Tertiary-educated patients highlighted presumed better understanding of radiological reports (53.6% vs. 25%), less confusion (16.5% vs. 37.5%), felt that the report would better prepare them for the clinic visit (79.4% vs. 47.5%), and increased understanding of their medical condition (79.4% vs. 50%). Wide differences in opinion on direct release of radiological reports, especially as education levels rise, need to be addressed. A \"one-size-fits-all\" approach does not suit our population, and physicians play a vital role by advocating for patients, helping them navigate complex medical terminology, and the increasingly complex medical landscape.</p>","PeriodicalId":516858,"journal":{"name":"Journal of imaging informatics in medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of imaging informatics in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-025-01655-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Singapore, there are plans to release radiological reports to patients directly, potentially before their physician clinic visits. While several studies have researched this policy in Caucasian-majority populations, there is scarce data for Asian-majority populations. This study aims to understand the perceptions of releasing radiological reports directly to patients before their clinic visit, by surveying physicians and patients at a major tertiary hospital in Singapore. Voluntary surveys were fielded to English-proficient patients who presented for select cross-sectional imaging, as well as physicians working at the hospital between March and July 2024. Statistical analysis was performed using Pearson's χ2 test and multivariate linear regression with a two-tailed statistical significance value of 0.05. An institutional review board waiver of consent was received. Analyzing 280 physician and 137 patient responses showed significant differences in agreement across all questions (p < 0.0001). Patients favored, and physicians opposed, the direct release of results. Subgroup analysis revealed significant differences (p < 0.05) between tertiary and pre-tertiary educated patients. Tertiary-educated patients highlighted presumed better understanding of radiological reports (53.6% vs. 25%), less confusion (16.5% vs. 37.5%), felt that the report would better prepare them for the clinic visit (79.4% vs. 47.5%), and increased understanding of their medical condition (79.4% vs. 50%). Wide differences in opinion on direct release of radiological reports, especially as education levels rise, need to be addressed. A "one-size-fits-all" approach does not suit our population, and physicians play a vital role by advocating for patients, helping them navigate complex medical terminology, and the increasingly complex medical landscape.

你真的想知道医生和精通英语的亚洲患者对新加坡直接发布放射学报告的态度吗?
在新加坡,计划直接向患者发布放射报告,可能会在他们去医生诊所之前发布。虽然有几项研究在白人占多数的人群中研究了这一政策,但在亚裔占多数的人群中却很少有数据。本研究旨在通过对新加坡一家大型三级医院的医生和患者进行调查,了解在患者就诊前直接向患者发布放射报告的看法。研究人员对2024年3月至7月期间在该医院工作的英语熟练患者和医生进行了自愿调查,这些患者接受了选择的横断面成像。统计学分析采用Pearson χ2检验和多元线性回归,双侧显著性值为0.05。我们收到了机构审查委员会的弃权同意书。分析了280名医生和137名患者的回答,发现所有问题的一致性存在显著差异
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信