A Calculator for the Maturity Model for Medical Patient Registries - Lessons Learned.

Tobias C von Brevern, Duc Bui Tien, Marie Habermann, Bogdan Noskov, Lucas Pilz, Jonas Bienzeisler, Anna Niemeyer, Rainer Röhrig, Raphael W Majeed
{"title":"A Calculator for the Maturity Model for Medical Patient Registries - Lessons Learned.","authors":"Tobias C von Brevern, Duc Bui Tien, Marie Habermann, Bogdan Noskov, Lucas Pilz, Jonas Bienzeisler, Anna Niemeyer, Rainer Röhrig, Raphael W Majeed","doi":"10.3233/SHTI251385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patient registries are an important resource for medical research and decision making. However, registry quality is difficult to assess due to their vast differences in structure and function. The Registry Maturity Model offers a way to self-assess the quality.</p><p><strong>State-of-the-art: </strong>The Registry Maturity Model is an established approach to assessing registry maturity. However, its current implementation in Excel poses practical challenges in terms of scalability and accessibility for widespread use within the registry community.</p><p><strong>Concept: </strong>To improve accessibility and scalability, we developed a publicly available and user-friendly web application.</p><p><strong>Implementation: </strong>The user interface of our application guides users through the quality attributes of the model via structured questions with predefined answer options. Inputs are instantly processed to calculate and visualize the maturity level across the various utility dimensions in real time. For continuity and reuse, the results can be saved and reused.</p><p><strong>Lessons learned: </strong>Our application aims to improve the model's usability, scalability and maintainability and makes it easier for stakeholders to evaluate a registries quality for their use purpose.</p>","PeriodicalId":94357,"journal":{"name":"Studies in health technology and informatics","volume":"331 ","pages":"102-111"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in health technology and informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI251385","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Patient registries are an important resource for medical research and decision making. However, registry quality is difficult to assess due to their vast differences in structure and function. The Registry Maturity Model offers a way to self-assess the quality.

State-of-the-art: The Registry Maturity Model is an established approach to assessing registry maturity. However, its current implementation in Excel poses practical challenges in terms of scalability and accessibility for widespread use within the registry community.

Concept: To improve accessibility and scalability, we developed a publicly available and user-friendly web application.

Implementation: The user interface of our application guides users through the quality attributes of the model via structured questions with predefined answer options. Inputs are instantly processed to calculate and visualize the maturity level across the various utility dimensions in real time. For continuity and reuse, the results can be saved and reused.

Lessons learned: Our application aims to improve the model's usability, scalability and maintainability and makes it easier for stakeholders to evaluate a registries quality for their use purpose.

医疗病人登记的成熟度模型计算器——经验教训。
患者登记是医学研究和决策的重要资源。然而,由于注册表在结构和功能上的巨大差异,注册表的质量很难评估。注册中心成熟度模型提供了一种自评估质量的方法。最新状态:注册中心成熟度模型是评估注册中心成熟度的一种已建立的方法。然而,它目前在Excel中的实现在可伸缩性和可访问性方面提出了实际挑战,难以在注册表社区中广泛使用。概念:为了提高可访问性和可扩展性,我们开发了一个公开可用且用户友好的web应用程序。实现:我们应用程序的用户界面通过带有预定义答案选项的结构化问题引导用户了解模型的质量属性。输入立即被处理,以实时计算和可视化跨各种效用维度的成熟度级别。为了连续性和重用,可以保存和重用结果。经验教训:我们的应用程序旨在提高模型的可用性、可扩展性和可维护性,并使涉众更容易根据其使用目的评估注册中心的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信