Mandibular Sagittal Split Osteotomy to High Carotid Pathology: Multidisciplinary Management.

Asian journal of neurosurgery Pub Date : 2025-04-03 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0045-1806857
Vladimir Victorovich Krylov, Victor Aleksandrovich Luk'ianchikov, Vadim Aleksandrovich Gorozhanin, Roman Nikolaevich Fedotov, Taras Andreevich Shatokhin, Dmitrii Nikolaevich Reshetov
{"title":"Mandibular Sagittal Split Osteotomy to High Carotid Pathology: Multidisciplinary Management.","authors":"Vladimir Victorovich Krylov, Victor Aleksandrovich Luk'ianchikov, Vadim Aleksandrovich Gorozhanin, Roman Nikolaevich Fedotov, Taras Andreevich Shatokhin, Dmitrii Nikolaevich Reshetov","doi":"10.1055/s-0045-1806857","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Surgical strategies for neck tumors extending to the skull base and high-lying carotid artery pathologies present significant challenges for surgeons, necessitating deviations from traditional neck surgery approaches. These tactics are adopted to expand the surgical approach. Although the mandibular sagittal split osteotomy (MSSO) has been routinely utilized in maxillofacial surgery, its integration into combined surgical approaches for head and neck pathologies has not been widely explored. We present our experience using MSSO in patients with neck pathology. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 12 patients who underwent surgery between 2020 and 2022 for benign neck tumors and vascular pathologies that posed challenges for removal using traditional approaches. All patients underwent surgical treatment utilizing the technique of unilateral MSSO and fragment retraction to enhance the surgical approach for neck pathologies. An evaluation of early postoperative outcomes was performed. Based on the criteria presented, the study group consisted of 12 patients with various histological types of benign tumors ( <i>n</i>  = 11) and atherosclerotic plaque in the carotid artery ( <i>n</i>  = 1). Following the osteotomy step, mandibular advancement of an average distance of 17.2 ± 1.6 mm was achieved, allowing for an extended surgical approach on the lateral aspect of the neck measuring 48.7 ± 3.5 mm. This technique facilitated the successful total tumor resection in most of cases. Complications related to the osteotomy were observed in two patients during the early postoperative period, which included malocclusion necessitating plate refixation and hematoma formation in the soft tissues of the neck. The utilization of the unilateral intraoral technique of sagittal split osteotomy with mandibular abduction has demonstrated good outcomes in providing an extended surgical approach for tumors located in the distal neck segment of the internal carotid artery.</p>","PeriodicalId":94300,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of neurosurgery","volume":"20 3","pages":"597-604"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12370354/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0045-1806857","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Surgical strategies for neck tumors extending to the skull base and high-lying carotid artery pathologies present significant challenges for surgeons, necessitating deviations from traditional neck surgery approaches. These tactics are adopted to expand the surgical approach. Although the mandibular sagittal split osteotomy (MSSO) has been routinely utilized in maxillofacial surgery, its integration into combined surgical approaches for head and neck pathologies has not been widely explored. We present our experience using MSSO in patients with neck pathology. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 12 patients who underwent surgery between 2020 and 2022 for benign neck tumors and vascular pathologies that posed challenges for removal using traditional approaches. All patients underwent surgical treatment utilizing the technique of unilateral MSSO and fragment retraction to enhance the surgical approach for neck pathologies. An evaluation of early postoperative outcomes was performed. Based on the criteria presented, the study group consisted of 12 patients with various histological types of benign tumors ( n  = 11) and atherosclerotic plaque in the carotid artery ( n  = 1). Following the osteotomy step, mandibular advancement of an average distance of 17.2 ± 1.6 mm was achieved, allowing for an extended surgical approach on the lateral aspect of the neck measuring 48.7 ± 3.5 mm. This technique facilitated the successful total tumor resection in most of cases. Complications related to the osteotomy were observed in two patients during the early postoperative period, which included malocclusion necessitating plate refixation and hematoma formation in the soft tissues of the neck. The utilization of the unilateral intraoral technique of sagittal split osteotomy with mandibular abduction has demonstrated good outcomes in providing an extended surgical approach for tumors located in the distal neck segment of the internal carotid artery.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

下颌矢状面劈开截骨术治疗颈动脉病变:多学科治疗。
颈部肿瘤延伸至颅底和高位颈动脉病变的手术策略对外科医生来说是一个重大挑战,需要偏离传统的颈部手术方法。这些策略被用来扩大手术入路。尽管下颌矢状面劈开截骨术(MSSO)已被常规应用于颌面外科,但其与头颈部病变联合手术入路的结合尚未得到广泛探讨。我们介绍了我们在颈部病变患者中使用MSSO的经验。对12名在2020年至2022年间因颈部良性肿瘤和血管病变接受手术的患者进行了回顾性分析,这些肿瘤和血管病变对传统方法的切除构成了挑战。所有患者均采用单侧MSSO和碎片牵开技术进行手术治疗,以加强颈部病变的手术入路。对早期术后结果进行评估。根据上述标准,研究组包括12例不同组织学类型的良性肿瘤患者(n = 11)和颈动脉粥样硬化斑块患者(n = 1)。在截骨步骤之后,下颌平均前进了17.2±1.6 mm,允许在颈部外侧延伸48.7±3.5 mm的手术入路。该技术在大多数病例中均能成功切除肿瘤。2例患者在术后早期观察到与截骨术相关的并发症,包括错牙合需要钢板再固定和颈部软组织形成血肿。单侧矢状面劈开截骨下颌外展技术的应用为内颈动脉远颈段肿瘤提供了一个扩展的手术入路,显示出良好的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信