Muhammad Omar Larik, Muhammad Fawad Tahir, Eeshal Fatima, Muhammad Usman Haider, Tanesh Ayyalu, Ahmad Sameed Akram, Hasan Ilyas, Mah I Kan Changez
{"title":"Trends and disparities in the location of mortality from myocardial infarction: A 21-year retrospective analysis.","authors":"Muhammad Omar Larik, Muhammad Fawad Tahir, Eeshal Fatima, Muhammad Usman Haider, Tanesh Ayyalu, Ahmad Sameed Akram, Hasan Ilyas, Mah I Kan Changez","doi":"10.1016/j.amjms.2025.08.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite noteworthy developments and advancements in the field of cardiovascular medicine, myocardial infarction (MI) remains one of the leading causes of mortality worldwide.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the existence of disparities within MI-related locations of deaths in the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data on death certificates from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research (CDC-WONDER) was utilized to evaluate trends in the locations of MI-related mortality from 1999 to 2020. The following locations were considered: (i) inpatient facilities, (ii) outpatient/emergency facilities, (iii) decedent's home, and (iv) nursing or hospice facilities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2858,426 MI-related deaths were utilized in this analysis. A steady decline in inpatient mortality was noted, along with a consistent increase in outpatient or emergency room (E.R.) mortality. The male sex was less likely to die in nursing or hospice facilities (OR: 0.44; P < 0.05). Younger individuals (<45 years) were more likely to die in outpatient/E.R. facilities (OR: 5.92; P < 0.05), whereas the elderly (85+ years) were more susceptible to nursing or hospice facilities. Non-Hispanic Black individuals were prone to death in outpatient/E.R. facilities (OR: 1.42; P < 0.05), whereas Non-Hispanic White individuals were more likely to die in nursing or hospice facilities. Additionally, rural areas had a higher risk of death at home (OR: 1.55; P < 0.05), whereas urban areas were more inclined towards inpatient mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This analysis identified several disparities and higher risk populations, emphasizing the need for better outreach to deliver practical management strategies in an equitable fashion.</p>","PeriodicalId":94223,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of the medical sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of the medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjms.2025.08.018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Despite noteworthy developments and advancements in the field of cardiovascular medicine, myocardial infarction (MI) remains one of the leading causes of mortality worldwide.
Aim: To investigate the existence of disparities within MI-related locations of deaths in the United States.
Methods: Data on death certificates from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research (CDC-WONDER) was utilized to evaluate trends in the locations of MI-related mortality from 1999 to 2020. The following locations were considered: (i) inpatient facilities, (ii) outpatient/emergency facilities, (iii) decedent's home, and (iv) nursing or hospice facilities.
Results: A total of 2858,426 MI-related deaths were utilized in this analysis. A steady decline in inpatient mortality was noted, along with a consistent increase in outpatient or emergency room (E.R.) mortality. The male sex was less likely to die in nursing or hospice facilities (OR: 0.44; P < 0.05). Younger individuals (<45 years) were more likely to die in outpatient/E.R. facilities (OR: 5.92; P < 0.05), whereas the elderly (85+ years) were more susceptible to nursing or hospice facilities. Non-Hispanic Black individuals were prone to death in outpatient/E.R. facilities (OR: 1.42; P < 0.05), whereas Non-Hispanic White individuals were more likely to die in nursing or hospice facilities. Additionally, rural areas had a higher risk of death at home (OR: 1.55; P < 0.05), whereas urban areas were more inclined towards inpatient mortality.
Conclusions: This analysis identified several disparities and higher risk populations, emphasizing the need for better outreach to deliver practical management strategies in an equitable fashion.