Intra-operative fluoroscopy exposure in endoscopic lumbar discectomies.

Surgical neurology international Pub Date : 2025-07-25 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.25259/SNI_523_2025
Panagiotis Tsipouriaris, Ioannis Panagiotis Athinodorou, Fotios Efthymiou, Vasileios I Metaxas, Christos Dimitroukas, Angelos Constantoyannis, George Panayiotakis, Constantine Constantoyannis
{"title":"Intra-operative fluoroscopy exposure in endoscopic lumbar discectomies.","authors":"Panagiotis Tsipouriaris, Ioannis Panagiotis Athinodorou, Fotios Efthymiou, Vasileios I Metaxas, Christos Dimitroukas, Angelos Constantoyannis, George Panayiotakis, Constantine Constantoyannis","doi":"10.25259/SNI_523_2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Spinal endoscopic procedures require the use of fluoroscopy to guide the placement of the instrumentation. This results in exposure to ionizing radiation of both medical staff and patients. This study aimed to evaluate the radiation doses during endoscopic lumbar discectomies in our institution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From July 2023 to February 2024, 54 patients with lumbar spine disc herniations were operated on by a single surgeon; operations included using a mobile C-arm to perform interlaminar endoscopic lumbar discectomy (IELD, <i>n</i> = 18) or transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy (TELD, <i>n</i> = 36). For each procedure, the following variables were analyzed: patient-related (age, gender, weight, and body mass index) and radiation-related data (fluoroscopy time [FT], tube voltage [kVp], kerma-area product [KAP], and cumulative air-kerma [CAK]).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients' age, procedural duration, number of cine acquisitions, and all radiation-related metrics (FT, KAP, CAK) demonstrated a significant difference between the two groups examined. Skin doses in both groups were well below the safe threshold. The mean age of the total sample was 52.27 years. The mean kVp was 103.44 for IELD group and 95.69 for TELD group. The mean KAP was 8.18 dGycm<sup>2</sup> for IELD group and 29.09 dGycm<sup>2</sup> for TELD group. CAK was 4.72 mGy for IELD group and 15.87 mGy for TELD group. The mean FT was 18.72 s for IELD group and 54.94 s for TELD group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intra-operative fluoroscopy results in a relatively low radiation dose during endoscopic discectomy procedures. We found comparable radiation dose data between both endoscopic techniques (IELD and TELD). However, transforaminal techniques require more FT and it is a more demanding procedure.</p>","PeriodicalId":94217,"journal":{"name":"Surgical neurology international","volume":"16 ","pages":"305"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12361666/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical neurology international","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/SNI_523_2025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Spinal endoscopic procedures require the use of fluoroscopy to guide the placement of the instrumentation. This results in exposure to ionizing radiation of both medical staff and patients. This study aimed to evaluate the radiation doses during endoscopic lumbar discectomies in our institution.

Methods: From July 2023 to February 2024, 54 patients with lumbar spine disc herniations were operated on by a single surgeon; operations included using a mobile C-arm to perform interlaminar endoscopic lumbar discectomy (IELD, n = 18) or transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy (TELD, n = 36). For each procedure, the following variables were analyzed: patient-related (age, gender, weight, and body mass index) and radiation-related data (fluoroscopy time [FT], tube voltage [kVp], kerma-area product [KAP], and cumulative air-kerma [CAK]).

Results: Patients' age, procedural duration, number of cine acquisitions, and all radiation-related metrics (FT, KAP, CAK) demonstrated a significant difference between the two groups examined. Skin doses in both groups were well below the safe threshold. The mean age of the total sample was 52.27 years. The mean kVp was 103.44 for IELD group and 95.69 for TELD group. The mean KAP was 8.18 dGycm2 for IELD group and 29.09 dGycm2 for TELD group. CAK was 4.72 mGy for IELD group and 15.87 mGy for TELD group. The mean FT was 18.72 s for IELD group and 54.94 s for TELD group.

Conclusion: Intra-operative fluoroscopy results in a relatively low radiation dose during endoscopic discectomy procedures. We found comparable radiation dose data between both endoscopic techniques (IELD and TELD). However, transforaminal techniques require more FT and it is a more demanding procedure.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

内镜下腰椎间盘切除术的术中透视暴露。
背景:脊柱内窥镜手术需要使用透视来指导器械的放置。这导致医务人员和病人都暴露在电离辐射中。本研究旨在评估我院内窥镜腰椎切除术时的辐射剂量。方法:自2023年7月至2024年2月,对54例腰椎间盘突出症患者进行单手术治疗;手术包括使用移动c型臂进行椎板间内窥镜腰椎间盘切除术(field, n = 18)或经椎间孔内窥镜腰椎间盘切除术(TELD, n = 36)。对于每个手术,分析以下变量:患者相关(年龄、性别、体重和体重指数)和辐射相关数据(透视时间[FT]、管电压[kVp]、克尔玛面积积[KAP]和累积空气克尔玛[CAK])。结果:两组患者的年龄、手术时间、电影获取次数和所有辐射相关指标(FT、KAP、CAK)均有显著差异。两组的皮肤剂量都远低于安全阈值。总样本平均年龄为52.27岁。field组平均kVp为103.44,TELD组平均kVp为95.69。field组平均KAP为8.18 dGycm2, TELD组平均KAP为29.09 dGycm2。field组CAK为4.72 mGy, TELD组CAK为15.87 mGy。field组平均FT为18.72 s, TELD组平均FT为54.94 s。结论:在内镜下椎间盘切除术过程中,术中透视可获得相对较低的辐射剂量。我们发现两种内镜技术(field和TELD)之间的辐射剂量数据相当。然而,椎间孔技术需要更多的FT,这是一个更苛刻的程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信