The Healthcare Professionals Attitudes Towards Deprescribing (HATD) tool in older persons with multiple long-term chronic conditions and those on palliative care: A mixed methods study.

IF 2.3
Elizabeth Hickman, Clare Gillies, Kamlesh Khunti, Samuel Seidu
{"title":"The Healthcare Professionals Attitudes Towards Deprescribing (HATD) tool in older persons with multiple long-term chronic conditions and those on palliative care: A mixed methods study.","authors":"Elizabeth Hickman, Clare Gillies, Kamlesh Khunti, Samuel Seidu","doi":"10.1016/j.pcd.2025.08.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate healthcare professionals' (HCPs) perspectives towards deprescribing in older adults living with multiple long term conditions (MLTCs), including those at the end of life, using the validated Healthcare Professionals' Attitudes Towards Deprescribing (HATD) tool, and to explore implications for medication management in conditions such as diabetes, where polypharmacy is common.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A cross-sectional online survey using the HATD questionnaire was disseminated across the United Kingdom from November 2023 to January 2024. Eligible participants were HCPs with experience managing older adults with MLTCs and/or those receiving end of life care. The tools 23-items covered five domains: concerns about deprescribing, perceived medication burden, organisational support, assurance in deprescribing decisions, and patient involvement. Quantitative data were summarised descriptively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-six HCPs participated (53 % doctors, 27 % pharmacists, 21 % allied health professionals). Many expressed discomfort in stopping medications initiated by specialists, particularly due to concerns about symptom recurrence or misattributed patient deterioration. Most recognised high medication burden, acknowledged that some drugs were no longer required, and agree deprescribing could improve quality of life. Barriers included lack of time, workload pressures, and insufficient training. Thematic analysis identified six key issues including perceived risk and fear of complains, absence of clear guidance, tensions between evidence based practice and multimorbidity, influence of specialist authority, resource constraints, and deprescribing as a potential routine practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Significant barriers to deprescribing persist in UK practice, highlighting the need for clearer guidance, training, and multidisciplinary collaboration to optimise prescribing, including in chronic conditions such as diabetes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94177,"journal":{"name":"Primary care diabetes","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary care diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcd.2025.08.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate healthcare professionals' (HCPs) perspectives towards deprescribing in older adults living with multiple long term conditions (MLTCs), including those at the end of life, using the validated Healthcare Professionals' Attitudes Towards Deprescribing (HATD) tool, and to explore implications for medication management in conditions such as diabetes, where polypharmacy is common.

Method: A cross-sectional online survey using the HATD questionnaire was disseminated across the United Kingdom from November 2023 to January 2024. Eligible participants were HCPs with experience managing older adults with MLTCs and/or those receiving end of life care. The tools 23-items covered five domains: concerns about deprescribing, perceived medication burden, organisational support, assurance in deprescribing decisions, and patient involvement. Quantitative data were summarised descriptively.

Results: Sixty-six HCPs participated (53 % doctors, 27 % pharmacists, 21 % allied health professionals). Many expressed discomfort in stopping medications initiated by specialists, particularly due to concerns about symptom recurrence or misattributed patient deterioration. Most recognised high medication burden, acknowledged that some drugs were no longer required, and agree deprescribing could improve quality of life. Barriers included lack of time, workload pressures, and insufficient training. Thematic analysis identified six key issues including perceived risk and fear of complains, absence of clear guidance, tensions between evidence based practice and multimorbidity, influence of specialist authority, resource constraints, and deprescribing as a potential routine practice.

Conclusions: Significant barriers to deprescribing persist in UK practice, highlighting the need for clearer guidance, training, and multidisciplinary collaboration to optimise prescribing, including in chronic conditions such as diabetes.

医疗保健专业人员对老年多重长期慢性疾病和姑息治疗的减处方(HATD)工具的态度:一项混合方法研究。
目的:利用经过验证的医疗保健专业人员对处方减少的态度(HATD)工具,调查医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)对患有多种长期疾病(MLTCs)的老年人(包括生命末期的老年人)处方减少的看法,并探讨对糖尿病等多种药物使用常见疾病的药物管理的影响。方法:从2023年11月至2024年1月,在英国各地使用HATD问卷进行横断面在线调查。符合条件的参与者是具有管理老年MLTCs和/或接受临终关怀经验的HCPs。工具的23个项目涵盖五个领域:对开处方的关注、感知到的药物负担、组织支持、开处方决策的保证以及患者参与。定量数据进行描述性总结。结果:66名HCPs参与其中(53 %医生,27 %药师,21 %专职卫生人员)。许多人对停止由专家开始的药物表示不适,特别是由于担心症状复发或误诊的患者恶化。大多数人认识到药物负担高,承认不再需要一些药物,并同意减少处方可以提高生活质量。障碍包括缺乏时间、工作量压力和培训不足。专题分析确定了六个关键问题,包括感知到的风险和对投诉的恐惧、缺乏明确的指导、基于证据的做法与多病之间的紧张关系、专家权威的影响、资源限制以及将处方作为一种潜在的常规做法。结论:在英国的实践中,减少处方的重大障碍仍然存在,强调需要更明确的指导、培训和多学科合作来优化处方,包括慢性疾病,如糖尿病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信