Bridging Emergency and Prevention: A Systematic Review of Take-Home Naloxone Programs.

IF 0.7
Lindsay Miller
{"title":"Bridging Emergency and Prevention: A Systematic Review of Take-Home Naloxone Programs.","authors":"Lindsay Miller","doi":"10.1097/JAN.0000000000000642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Drug overdose deaths have been drastically rising in the past decade. Healthcare providers need to continuously innovate practices to provide historically underserved patients with access to harm reduction. The purpose of this study is to identify previously implemented take-home naloxone (THN) interventions to review outcomes and implementation strategies across different organizations in the United States. This review provides guidance to assist in developing, shaping, and evaluating benchmarks for other emergency departments (EDs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, this systematic review was conducted using PubMed, CINAHL Ultimate, and PsycInfo. This study used a two-concept search strategy with naloxone and ED subject headings to identify peer-reviewed articles with primary data from an ED-based THN intervention. The data were extracted using a tool developed by the author and comprised of three main categories: sample, components, and delivery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After screening for inclusion, a total of 10 articles were retained in the final sample. Studies varied by administration credibility based on the delivery of the overdose education and the degree of follow-up after discharge. While each study delivered naloxone, the programs across all sites packaged several different intervention components into the THN.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Study implementers should be aware of the cost, technological, and political feasibility of each component of the program. Specifically, funding has consistently been listed as a barrier to implementation. It is recommended that study teams become interdisciplinary and include voices from multiple departments within the healthcare system, as well as in partnership with local community organizations.</p>","PeriodicalId":94062,"journal":{"name":"Journal of addictions nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of addictions nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JAN.0000000000000642","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Drug overdose deaths have been drastically rising in the past decade. Healthcare providers need to continuously innovate practices to provide historically underserved patients with access to harm reduction. The purpose of this study is to identify previously implemented take-home naloxone (THN) interventions to review outcomes and implementation strategies across different organizations in the United States. This review provides guidance to assist in developing, shaping, and evaluating benchmarks for other emergency departments (EDs).

Methods: Using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, this systematic review was conducted using PubMed, CINAHL Ultimate, and PsycInfo. This study used a two-concept search strategy with naloxone and ED subject headings to identify peer-reviewed articles with primary data from an ED-based THN intervention. The data were extracted using a tool developed by the author and comprised of three main categories: sample, components, and delivery.

Results: After screening for inclusion, a total of 10 articles were retained in the final sample. Studies varied by administration credibility based on the delivery of the overdose education and the degree of follow-up after discharge. While each study delivered naloxone, the programs across all sites packaged several different intervention components into the THN.

Conclusions: Study implementers should be aware of the cost, technological, and political feasibility of each component of the program. Specifically, funding has consistently been listed as a barrier to implementation. It is recommended that study teams become interdisciplinary and include voices from multiple departments within the healthcare system, as well as in partnership with local community organizations.

桥接紧急和预防:带回家纳洛酮计划的系统回顾。
背景:在过去十年中,药物过量死亡人数急剧上升。医疗保健提供者需要不断创新实践,为历史上服务不足的患者提供减少伤害的途径。本研究的目的是确定以前实施的带回家纳洛酮(THN)干预措施,以审查美国不同组织的结果和实施策略。本综述为其他急诊科(ed)制定、形成和评估基准提供了指导。方法:采用系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目,本系统评价使用PubMed、CINAHL Ultimate和PsycInfo进行。本研究使用纳洛酮和ED主题标题的双概念搜索策略来识别同行评议的文章,这些文章的主要数据来自基于ED的THN干预。数据是使用作者开发的工具提取的,包括三个主要类别:样本、成分和交付。结果:经筛选纳入后,最终样本中共保留10篇文章。根据用药过量教育的提供和出院后随访的程度,研究的可信度各不相同。虽然每个研究都提供纳洛酮,但所有地点的项目都将几种不同的干预成分打包到THN中。结论:研究实施者应该意识到项目每个组成部分的成本、技术和政治可行性。具体而言,资金一直被列为实施的障碍。建议研究小组成为跨学科的,包括来自医疗保健系统内多个部门的声音,以及与当地社区组织的合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信