Effects of Two Low-Frequency Intradialytic Cycling Training Programs on Functional Capacity in Subjects Undergoing Hemodialysis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 1.2
Ahmad Mahdi Ahmad, Mona Mohammed Ghareeb, Ahmed Ezzat Mansour, Heba Ahmed Mousa
{"title":"Effects of Two Low-Frequency Intradialytic Cycling Training Programs on Functional Capacity in Subjects Undergoing Hemodialysis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Ahmad Mahdi Ahmad, Mona Mohammed Ghareeb, Ahmed Ezzat Mansour, Heba Ahmed Mousa","doi":"10.1111/hdi.70017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Functional capacity deteriorates over time in patients on hemodialysis, which is associated with increased mortality risk. This study aimed to assess the effects of two low-frequency (i.e., twice weekly) intradialytic cycling exercise training programs-low- to moderate-intensity continuous training (L-MICT) versus moderate- to high-intensity interval training (M-HIIT) - on functional capacity in patients undergoing hemodialysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty-seven out of sixty-nine patients undergoing hemodialysis of both sexes (44 men and 23 women), aged 35-55 years, completed this study. Patients were randomly assigned to three groups: L-MICT group (n = 23), M-HIIT group (n = 21), and nonexercise control group (n = 23). Patients in the L-MICT group performed intradialytic cycling exercise continuously at a low-to moderate-intensity for 20-30 min. Patients in the M-HIIT group performed 3 × 3-min moderate- to high-intensity cycling exercise, separated by 4-min low-intensity active breaks. The intradialytic cycling programs were scheduled twice a week for 8 weeks. The outcome measure was the functional capacity assessed by the 6-min walk test (6MWT).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The 6-min walk distance (6MWD) increased significantly in the L-MICT group [p = 0.004, the change score (Δ) = 18.2 meters (m)], in the M-HIIT group (p = 0.001, Δ = 17.6 m), and in the control group (p = 0.014, Δ = 11.4 m) compared to baseline. However, no significant differences were found between groups.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Low-frequency intradialytic cycling training programs, either L-MICT or M-HIIT, twice a week for 8 weeks, could similarly induce statistically significant improvements in the 6MWD in people receiving hemodialysis. Nevertheless, the 6MWD changes did not exceed the minimally detectable change previously reported in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":94027,"journal":{"name":"Hemodialysis international. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hemodialysis international. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/hdi.70017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Functional capacity deteriorates over time in patients on hemodialysis, which is associated with increased mortality risk. This study aimed to assess the effects of two low-frequency (i.e., twice weekly) intradialytic cycling exercise training programs-low- to moderate-intensity continuous training (L-MICT) versus moderate- to high-intensity interval training (M-HIIT) - on functional capacity in patients undergoing hemodialysis.

Methods: Sixty-seven out of sixty-nine patients undergoing hemodialysis of both sexes (44 men and 23 women), aged 35-55 years, completed this study. Patients were randomly assigned to three groups: L-MICT group (n = 23), M-HIIT group (n = 21), and nonexercise control group (n = 23). Patients in the L-MICT group performed intradialytic cycling exercise continuously at a low-to moderate-intensity for 20-30 min. Patients in the M-HIIT group performed 3 × 3-min moderate- to high-intensity cycling exercise, separated by 4-min low-intensity active breaks. The intradialytic cycling programs were scheduled twice a week for 8 weeks. The outcome measure was the functional capacity assessed by the 6-min walk test (6MWT).

Findings: The 6-min walk distance (6MWD) increased significantly in the L-MICT group [p = 0.004, the change score (Δ) = 18.2 meters (m)], in the M-HIIT group (p = 0.001, Δ = 17.6 m), and in the control group (p = 0.014, Δ = 11.4 m) compared to baseline. However, no significant differences were found between groups.

Discussion: Low-frequency intradialytic cycling training programs, either L-MICT or M-HIIT, twice a week for 8 weeks, could similarly induce statistically significant improvements in the 6MWD in people receiving hemodialysis. Nevertheless, the 6MWD changes did not exceed the minimally detectable change previously reported in this population.

两种低频循环训练方案对血液透析患者功能能力的影响:一项随机对照试验。
导读:血液透析患者的功能能力随着时间的推移而恶化,这与死亡风险增加有关。本研究旨在评估两种低频率(即每周两次)的透析内循环运动训练计划-低至中等强度连续训练(L-MICT)与中至高强度间歇训练(M-HIIT) -对血液透析患者功能能力的影响。方法:69例接受血液透析的患者中有67例(男性44例,女性23例),年龄35-55岁,完成了本研究。患者随机分为三组:L-MICT组(n = 23)、M-HIIT组(n = 21)和非运动对照组(n = 23)。L-MICT组患者连续进行低至中等强度的透析循环运动20-30分钟。M-HIIT组患者进行3 × 3分钟的中高强度自行车运动,中间间隔4分钟的低强度活动休息。透析内循环计划每周两次,持续8周。结果测量是通过6分钟步行测试(6MWT)评估功能能力。结果:与基线相比,L-MICT组6分钟步行距离(6MWD)显著增加[p = 0.004,变化评分(Δ) = 18.2米(m)], m - hiit组(p = 0.001, Δ = 17.6米),对照组(p = 0.014, Δ = 11.4米)。然而,两组之间没有发现显著差异。讨论:在接受血液透析的患者中,低频循环训练项目,无论是L-MICT还是M-HIIT,每周两次,持续8周,同样可以诱导6MWD的统计学显著改善。然而,6MWD的变化并没有超过先前在该人群中报道的最低可检测变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信