["Settling down, sorting, and keeping your compass". Experience of a health education consultation on complementary therapies].

IF 0.8
Geoffrey Coisnon, Céline Truong, Nicolas Pinsault, Richard Monvoisin, Pauline Girard, Léo Druart
{"title":"[\"Settling down, sorting, and keeping your compass\". Experience of a health education consultation on complementary therapies].","authors":"Geoffrey Coisnon, Céline Truong, Nicolas Pinsault, Richard Monvoisin, Pauline Girard, Léo Druart","doi":"10.1016/j.bulcan.2025.06.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAMs) by breast cancer patients is frequent but not without risks. An open and patient-centered discussion on the subject is essential. The objective of this study was to explore the experiences of breast cancer patients during a health education consultation about complementary and alternative medicine (CAMs) using a serious game.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This qualitative study was inspired by interpretative phenomenology. Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with nine breast cancer patients who participated in a health education consultation on CAMs as part of a larger quantitative trial.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The participants' use of CAMs assimilated to a form of compensatory medicine in response to their perceived gaps in the conventional healthcare system. The conversation based on the serious game and the caregiver's open, non-judgmental approach fostered horizontal dialogue and critical reflection about the patients' health choices. Although participants expressed a desire for autonomy through this use, they expressed a need for support to avoid bearing the responsibility of decision-making alone. Despite these positive feedbacks, the perceived impact of the serious game intervention on their practice and decision-making was limited.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The health education consultation provided patients with a space for communication and reflection, serving as support for decision-making and enhancing their experiential knowledge.</p>","PeriodicalId":93917,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin du cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin du cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bulcan.2025.06.012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAMs) by breast cancer patients is frequent but not without risks. An open and patient-centered discussion on the subject is essential. The objective of this study was to explore the experiences of breast cancer patients during a health education consultation about complementary and alternative medicine (CAMs) using a serious game.

Methods: This qualitative study was inspired by interpretative phenomenology. Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with nine breast cancer patients who participated in a health education consultation on CAMs as part of a larger quantitative trial.

Results: The participants' use of CAMs assimilated to a form of compensatory medicine in response to their perceived gaps in the conventional healthcare system. The conversation based on the serious game and the caregiver's open, non-judgmental approach fostered horizontal dialogue and critical reflection about the patients' health choices. Although participants expressed a desire for autonomy through this use, they expressed a need for support to avoid bearing the responsibility of decision-making alone. Despite these positive feedbacks, the perceived impact of the serious game intervention on their practice and decision-making was limited.

Discussion: The health education consultation provided patients with a space for communication and reflection, serving as support for decision-making and enhancing their experiential knowledge.

“安定下来,分门别类,保持方向感”。一次关于补充疗法的健康教育咨询的经验]。
乳腺癌患者经常使用补充和替代医学(CAMs),但并非没有风险。对这个问题进行公开和以病人为中心的讨论是必不可少的。本研究的目的是探讨乳腺癌患者在补充和替代医学(CAMs)健康教育咨询期间的体验。方法:以解释现象学为灵感进行定性研究。作为一项规模更大的定量试验的一部分,研究人员对参加CAMs健康教育咨询的9名乳腺癌患者进行了个别半结构化访谈。结果:参与者使用CAMs被同化为补偿医学的一种形式,以响应他们在传统医疗保健系统中的感知差距。基于严肃游戏的对话和护理人员的开放,非评判的方法促进了对患者健康选择的横向对话和批判性反思。虽然与会者表示希望通过这种使用实现自主,但他们表示需要得到支持,以避免独自承担决策责任。尽管有这些积极的反馈,但严肃的游戏干预对他们的练习和决策的感知影响是有限的。讨论:健康教育咨询为患者提供了一个交流和反思的空间,为患者的决策提供支持,增强患者的经验知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信