A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial Assessing the Feasibility and Acceptability of Family-Partnered Delirium Prevention, Detection, and Management in Critically Ill Adults: The Activating Family Caregivers in the Identification Prevention and Management of Delirium (ACTIVATE) Study.

IF 2.7 Q4 Medicine
Critical care explorations Pub Date : 2025-08-22 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1097/CCE.0000000000001287
Kirsten M Fiest, Karla D Krewulak, Bonnie G Sept, Judy E Davidson, E Wesley Ely, Chel H Lee, Andrea Soo, Henry T Stelfox
{"title":"A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial Assessing the Feasibility and Acceptability of Family-Partnered Delirium Prevention, Detection, and Management in Critically Ill Adults: The Activating Family Caregivers in the Identification Prevention and Management of Delirium (ACTIVATE) Study.","authors":"Kirsten M Fiest, Karla D Krewulak, Bonnie G Sept, Judy E Davidson, E Wesley Ely, Chel H Lee, Andrea Soo, Henry T Stelfox","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives background: </strong>Delirium remains frequently undetected by healthcare providers; partnering with family may be a novel way to identify and manage delirium. This study explores the feasibility of a family-administered intervention for delirium prevention, detection, and management.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Pilot randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Two Canadian ICUs.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Patient-family pairs (dyads) were included. Eligible patients had no primary brain injury, a Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale score of greater than or equal to -3, and were expected to remain in the ICU for at least 24 hours to complete all study assessments.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Dyads were randomly assigned to either standard care (control) or the intervention, which included delirium education and family-administered checklists with prevention/management strategies and a detection tool (\"Sour Seven\").</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Outcomes included feasibility indicators, enrollment and completion rates, and psychological outcomes (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, and the Kessler Psychologic Distress (K-10) scales in the ICU and at 1- and 3-month follow-ups. Between January 2020 and June 2023, during the height of the COVID pandemic, 197 patient-family pairs were approached, with 64 (32%) consenting to participate; participation required both the patient and a family member. Despite recruitment challenges, 75% of families completed in-ICU questionnaires, and 38% completed all follow-ups. The family members in the intervention group demonstrated increased delirium knowledge compared with baseline delirium knowledge, and engagement in prevention strategies, with 8 of 19 (42%) family members identifying delirium using the Sour Seven. At the 3-month follow-up, seven family members showed significant anxiety, and five showed significant depression. Observations of ICU rounds revealed limited delirium discussions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This pilot study demonstrated the feasibility of family-administered delirium care in ICU settings. However, the likely impact of the COVID-19 pandemic cannot be overlooked. The study faced recruitment challenges and demonstrated the difficulties of family involvement in delirium care, particularly during restricted family presence. A full evaluation of effectiveness requires a hypothesis-testing trial with procedural adjustments to streamline data collection and strengthen family-care team partnerships.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04099472).</p>","PeriodicalId":93957,"journal":{"name":"Critical care explorations","volume":"7 9","pages":"e1287"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12377300/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care explorations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001287","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives background: Delirium remains frequently undetected by healthcare providers; partnering with family may be a novel way to identify and manage delirium. This study explores the feasibility of a family-administered intervention for delirium prevention, detection, and management.

Design: Pilot randomized controlled trial.

Setting: Two Canadian ICUs.

Subjects: Patient-family pairs (dyads) were included. Eligible patients had no primary brain injury, a Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale score of greater than or equal to -3, and were expected to remain in the ICU for at least 24 hours to complete all study assessments.

Interventions: Dyads were randomly assigned to either standard care (control) or the intervention, which included delirium education and family-administered checklists with prevention/management strategies and a detection tool ("Sour Seven").

Measurements and main results: Outcomes included feasibility indicators, enrollment and completion rates, and psychological outcomes (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, and the Kessler Psychologic Distress (K-10) scales in the ICU and at 1- and 3-month follow-ups. Between January 2020 and June 2023, during the height of the COVID pandemic, 197 patient-family pairs were approached, with 64 (32%) consenting to participate; participation required both the patient and a family member. Despite recruitment challenges, 75% of families completed in-ICU questionnaires, and 38% completed all follow-ups. The family members in the intervention group demonstrated increased delirium knowledge compared with baseline delirium knowledge, and engagement in prevention strategies, with 8 of 19 (42%) family members identifying delirium using the Sour Seven. At the 3-month follow-up, seven family members showed significant anxiety, and five showed significant depression. Observations of ICU rounds revealed limited delirium discussions.

Conclusions: This pilot study demonstrated the feasibility of family-administered delirium care in ICU settings. However, the likely impact of the COVID-19 pandemic cannot be overlooked. The study faced recruitment challenges and demonstrated the difficulties of family involvement in delirium care, particularly during restricted family presence. A full evaluation of effectiveness requires a hypothesis-testing trial with procedural adjustments to streamline data collection and strengthen family-care team partnerships.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04099472).

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

一项评估危重成人家庭合作谵妄预防、检测和管理的可行性和可接受性的试点随机对照试验:激活家庭照顾者在谵妄的识别、预防和管理(ACTIVATE)研究中的作用。
目的背景:谵妄经常未被医疗保健提供者发现;与家人合作可能是一种识别和管理谵妄的新方法。本研究探讨了家庭干预谵妄预防、检测和管理的可行性。设计:先导随机对照试验。设置:两个加拿大icu。研究对象:包括患者-家庭对(二人组)。符合条件的患者无原发性脑损伤,Richmond激动-镇静量表评分大于或等于-3,预计将留在ICU至少24小时以完成所有研究评估。干预:二人组被随机分配到标准治疗组(对照组)或干预组,干预组包括谵妄教育和家庭管理的检查表,包括预防/管理策略和检测工具(“Sour Seven”)。测量方法和主要结果:结果包括可行性指标、入组率和完成率,以及在ICU和随访1个月和3个月时的心理结果(广泛性焦虑障碍-7、患者健康问卷-9和Kessler心理困扰(K-10)量表)。2020年1月至2023年6月,在COVID大流行高峰期,我们接触了197对患者-家庭对,其中64对(32%)同意参与;患者和家属都需要参与。尽管有招募方面的挑战,75%的家庭完成了icu内的问卷调查,38%的家庭完成了所有的随访。与基线谵妄知识相比,干预组的家庭成员表现出谵妄知识的增加,并参与预防策略,19名家庭成员中有8名(42%)使用Sour Seven识别谵妄。在3个月的随访中,7名家庭成员表现出明显的焦虑,5名家庭成员表现出明显的抑郁。ICU查房观察显示谵妄讨论有限。结论:本初步研究证明了在ICU环境中家庭管理谵妄护理的可行性。然而,COVID-19大流行可能产生的影响不容忽视。该研究面临着招募的挑战,并证明了家庭参与谵妄护理的困难,特别是在家庭存在受限的情况下。对有效性的全面评估需要进行假设检验试验,并进行程序调整,以简化数据收集并加强家庭护理团队的伙伴关系。试验注册:Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04099472)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信