3D-Printed Orthoses vs Conventional Immobilization Methods for Pediatric Distal Radius Fractures.

Abstract

Distal radius fracture (DRF) is the most common fracture among pediatric patients, usually occurring after a fall onto an outstretched hand. The growing incidence of DRFs highlights the need to explore improved treatment methods to ensure proper healing and realignment. Current immobilization methods are inconsistent and have negative impacts on patient satisfaction. Drawbacks of fiberglass casts include thermal injuries, discomfort, and increased risk of skin infection. While prefabricated splints have less downsides than fiberglass casts, skin irritation and odor are still a concern. 3D-printed orthoses present a viable alternative to traditional immobilization methods for DRFs, especially in the pediatric population. By scanning the fractured radius, the orthosis is tailored specifically to the patient's anatomy. 3D-printed orthoses are water resistant, breathable, and tend to weigh less. As a result, they offer improved hygiene, comfort, and patient satisfaction while reducing complications seen with more traditional methods of immobilization. Preliminary research suggests 3D-printed orthoses are as effective as traditional immobilization methods in pediatric patients with DRFs. However, additional studies are needed to further assess the patient satisfaction, compliance, and durability of 3D-printed orthoses compared to traditional immobilization methods in the pediatric population.