Can I Interview Her? Gatekeeping in a Telephone Survey of Female Migrants in India.

Survey practice Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-02 DOI:10.29115/sp-2024-0029
Sharan Sharma, Bijay Chouhan, O P Sharma, Jaya Koti, Sonalde Desai
{"title":"Can I Interview Her? Gatekeeping in a Telephone Survey of Female Migrants in India.","authors":"Sharan Sharma, Bijay Chouhan, O P Sharma, Jaya Koti, Sonalde Desai","doi":"10.29115/sp-2024-0029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper explores 'gatekeeping', the phenomenon where access to a sample person in the household is controlled by another person. Gatekeeping of female persons is especially an issue in societies governed by gendered social norms. It can increase survey error by reducing response rates and potentially increasing non-response bias, and can increase measurement error when gatekeepers insist on providing proxy responses. We contribute to the sparse literature on gatekeeping by using data from a telephone survey of migrants in India and focusing on the sample of female married-out migrants. We estimate the prevalence of gatekeeping, compare outcomes of calls made to gatekept versus non-gatekept cases, and model the likelihood of a proxy interview. We estimate that gatekeeping of females in telephone surveys is in the range of 56%-65%, with gatekept calls much more likely to result in proxy interviews. We find that older and more-educated women are less subject to gatekeeping and that male and married interviewers are associated with a greater likelihood of gatekeeping. We discuss implications of these results for survey practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":74893,"journal":{"name":"Survey practice","volume":"19 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12362564/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Survey practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29115/sp-2024-0029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper explores 'gatekeeping', the phenomenon where access to a sample person in the household is controlled by another person. Gatekeeping of female persons is especially an issue in societies governed by gendered social norms. It can increase survey error by reducing response rates and potentially increasing non-response bias, and can increase measurement error when gatekeepers insist on providing proxy responses. We contribute to the sparse literature on gatekeeping by using data from a telephone survey of migrants in India and focusing on the sample of female married-out migrants. We estimate the prevalence of gatekeeping, compare outcomes of calls made to gatekept versus non-gatekept cases, and model the likelihood of a proxy interview. We estimate that gatekeeping of females in telephone surveys is in the range of 56%-65%, with gatekept calls much more likely to result in proxy interviews. We find that older and more-educated women are less subject to gatekeeping and that male and married interviewers are associated with a greater likelihood of gatekeeping. We discuss implications of these results for survey practice.

我可以采访她吗?印度女性移民电话调查中的守门人。
本文探讨了“守门人”现象,即访问家庭中一个样本人的权限由另一个人控制。在受性别社会规范支配的社会中,女性的把关尤其是个问题。它可以通过降低响应率和潜在地增加非响应偏差来增加调查误差,并且可以在看门人坚持提供代理响应时增加测量误差。我们通过使用来自印度移民的电话调查数据,并专注于已婚女性移民的样本,为有关把关的稀疏文献做出贡献。我们估计把关的普遍性,比较把关与非把关案例的通话结果,并模拟代理面谈的可能性。我们估计,在电话调查中,守门的女性比例在56%-65%之间,守门的电话更有可能导致代理访谈。我们发现,年龄较大和受教育程度较高的女性较少受到把关的影响,而男性和已婚面试官更有可能受到把关的影响。我们讨论了这些结果对调查实践的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信