Impact of scaffold material choice on osteosarcoma phenotype and drug responses in 3D.

IF 9.6
Callan E Monette, Jeehee Lee, Abena Peasah, Leanne C Sayles, Michelle Tai, E Alejandro Sweet-Cordero, Fan Yang
{"title":"Impact of scaffold material choice on osteosarcoma phenotype and drug responses in 3D.","authors":"Callan E Monette, Jeehee Lee, Abena Peasah, Leanne C Sayles, Michelle Tai, E Alejandro Sweet-Cordero, Fan Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.actbio.2025.08.046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Biomaterials-based 3D models have emerged as new cancer research tools for studying osteosarcoma (OS). However, the impact of scaffold material choice on OS phenotype and drug responses in 3D remains largely unknown, as previous studies used different biomaterials as scaffolds without direct comparison. In this study, we systematically compared four biomaterials: Gelatin methacrylate (GelMA), Gelatin microribbons (Gel µRB), Collagen I hydrogel (Col1), and Poly(DL-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA). All have previously been applied for either 3D OS culture or bone tissue engineering. To mimic the mineral component of bone, hydroxyapatite mineral nanoparticles (HAnp) were incorporated into all scaffolds. We assessed key clinically relevant OS phenotypes including cell proliferation, extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition, and responses to multiple chemotherapeutic agents. Our results demonstrate that scaffold material significantly influences OS phenotype and drug resistance. Notably, PLGA results in the lowest cell proliferation, GelMA promotes drug resistance and tumor ECM deposition, and Gel µRB better mimics OS signaling of orthotopic tumor xenografts in vivo. The findings from this comparative study underscore the impact of scaffold choice on OS phenotype and drug response. It also provides valuable insights for guiding the selection of appropriate scaffold materials to better mimic the desirable OS phenotype to advance OS therapeutic discovery. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Osteosarcoma (OS), a highly aggressive bone cancer, has seen a stagnant survival rate for over three decades. This study addresses a critical knowledge gap by comparing four widely used bone tissue engineering scaffolds for 3D OS culture. Unlike previous studies, this work provides a comprehensive analysis of how scaffold choice influences OS proliferation, signaling, extracellular matrix deposition, and drug resistance. These findings underscore the critical role of biomaterials choice in modulating OS behavior and will guide the choice of 3D scaffolds for more effective OS disease modeling and improving therapeutic discovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":93848,"journal":{"name":"Acta biomaterialia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta biomaterialia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2025.08.046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Biomaterials-based 3D models have emerged as new cancer research tools for studying osteosarcoma (OS). However, the impact of scaffold material choice on OS phenotype and drug responses in 3D remains largely unknown, as previous studies used different biomaterials as scaffolds without direct comparison. In this study, we systematically compared four biomaterials: Gelatin methacrylate (GelMA), Gelatin microribbons (Gel µRB), Collagen I hydrogel (Col1), and Poly(DL-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA). All have previously been applied for either 3D OS culture or bone tissue engineering. To mimic the mineral component of bone, hydroxyapatite mineral nanoparticles (HAnp) were incorporated into all scaffolds. We assessed key clinically relevant OS phenotypes including cell proliferation, extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition, and responses to multiple chemotherapeutic agents. Our results demonstrate that scaffold material significantly influences OS phenotype and drug resistance. Notably, PLGA results in the lowest cell proliferation, GelMA promotes drug resistance and tumor ECM deposition, and Gel µRB better mimics OS signaling of orthotopic tumor xenografts in vivo. The findings from this comparative study underscore the impact of scaffold choice on OS phenotype and drug response. It also provides valuable insights for guiding the selection of appropriate scaffold materials to better mimic the desirable OS phenotype to advance OS therapeutic discovery. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Osteosarcoma (OS), a highly aggressive bone cancer, has seen a stagnant survival rate for over three decades. This study addresses a critical knowledge gap by comparing four widely used bone tissue engineering scaffolds for 3D OS culture. Unlike previous studies, this work provides a comprehensive analysis of how scaffold choice influences OS proliferation, signaling, extracellular matrix deposition, and drug resistance. These findings underscore the critical role of biomaterials choice in modulating OS behavior and will guide the choice of 3D scaffolds for more effective OS disease modeling and improving therapeutic discovery.

3D支架材料选择对骨肉瘤表型和药物反应的影响。
基于生物材料的3D模型已成为研究骨肉瘤(OS)的新癌症研究工具。然而,支架材料的选择对OS表型和3D药物反应的影响在很大程度上仍然未知,因为先前的研究使用不同的生物材料作为支架,没有直接比较。在这项研究中,我们系统地比较了四种生物材料:甲基丙烯酸明胶(GelMA)、明胶微带(GelµRB)、I型胶原水凝胶(Col1)和聚(dl -丙交酯-共聚物)(PLGA)。所有这些都曾应用于3D OS培养或骨组织工程。为了模拟骨的矿物成分,羟基磷灰石矿物纳米颗粒(HAnp)被加入到所有支架中。我们评估了关键的临床相关OS表型,包括细胞增殖、细胞外基质(ECM)沉积和对多种化疗药物的反应。我们的研究结果表明,支架材料显著影响OS表型和耐药性。值得注意的是,PLGA导致细胞增殖最低,GelMA促进耐药和肿瘤ECM沉积,GelµRB在体内更好地模拟原位肿瘤异种移植物的OS信号。这项比较研究的结果强调了支架选择对OS表型和药物反应的影响。它还为指导选择合适的支架材料以更好地模拟理想的OS表型以推进OS治疗发现提供了有价值的见解。意义声明:骨肉瘤(OS)是一种高度侵袭性的骨癌,30多年来生存率一直停滞不前。本研究通过比较四种广泛使用的用于3D骨肉瘤培养的骨组织工程支架,解决了一个关键的知识空白。与以往的研究不同,这项工作提供了支架选择如何影响OS增殖、信号传导、细胞外基质沉积和耐药性的全面分析。这些发现强调了生物材料选择在调节骨肉瘤行为中的关键作用,并将指导3D支架的选择,以更有效地建立骨肉瘤疾病模型和改善治疗发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信