[Surgical treatment variation of displaced femoral neck fractures in certified centers for geriatric trauma DGU® and arthroplasty centers in Germany].

Yasmin Hartmann, Katherine Rascher, Miguel Pishnamaz, Filippo Migliorini, Klemens Horst, Matthias Knobe, Frank Hildebrand, Christian David Weber
{"title":"[Surgical treatment variation of displaced femoral neck fractures in certified centers for geriatric trauma DGU® and arthroplasty centers in Germany].","authors":"Yasmin Hartmann, Katherine Rascher, Miguel Pishnamaz, Filippo Migliorini, Klemens Horst, Matthias Knobe, Frank Hildebrand, Christian David Weber","doi":"10.1007/s00113-025-01619-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is an almost unique certification structure in Germany in which clinics can be certified either as trauma center DGU® (TraumaZentrum DGU®), geriatric trauma center DGU® (AltrsTraumaZentrum DGU®) or arthroplasty center (endoCert), among others. Geriatric patients with displaced femoral neck fractures represent a highly relevant entity. The structural and process quality are validated within the framework of certification as both an AltersTraumaZentrum DGU® (ATZ) and arthroplasty center (EPZ), which represents a methodologically challenging approach to the analysis of treatment reality.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Is there a treatment variation between certified geriatric trauma centers (ATZ) and dual certified geriatric and arthroplasty centers (ATZ+EPZ) with respect to joint-preserving or joint replacement surgical procedures for geriatric displaced femoral neck fractures and short-term complications?</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Data from the Registry for Geriatric Trauma of the German Trauma Society (ATR-DGU) from 46 clinics with ATZ and 52 clinics with ATZ + EPZ were analyzed. The follow-up period included both the in-hospital stay and a 120-day follow-up interval. The primary outcome was mortality, secondary endpoints included mobility, reoperations and health status. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to calculate odds ratios (OR) after adjustment for age, gender, ASA score and concomitant injuries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age of the collective (n = 7389) was 84 years, 29.6% and 29.8% respectively were male, the median time until surgery was 20.9 h (ATZ) vs. 20.5 h (ATZ + EPZ) and the median length of stay was 15.1 days for both types of center. The number of joint-preserving interventions was significantly increased in ATZ compared to clinics with dual certification (ATZ: 8.6% vs. ATZ + EPZ: 2.6%; OR = 3.63). The reoperation rate was comparable in the primary stay (3.7% vs. 3.9%) but was significantly increased over the 120-day course in clinics with dual certification (4.1% vs. 6.0%; p = 0.022). Revisions due to periprosthetic fractures occurred more frequently in ATZ without EPZ (8.2% vs. 3.5%). The multivariate analysis showed an increased mortality in the acute phase (OR 1.26; 1.02-1.56; p = 0.031), an increased rate of reoperations in the 120-day course (OR 1.45; 1.06-2.02; p = 0.024) and inpatient readmissions (OR 1.42, 1.02-2.00; p = 0.043) for centers with dual certification.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In Germany an institutional treatment variation for geriatric displaced femoral neck fractures exists. In certified geriatric trauma centers without certified arthroplasty center there is a significantly increased rate of joint-preserving treatment with differences in terms of morbidity and mortality in the acute phase.</p>","PeriodicalId":75280,"journal":{"name":"Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-025-01619-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is an almost unique certification structure in Germany in which clinics can be certified either as trauma center DGU® (TraumaZentrum DGU®), geriatric trauma center DGU® (AltrsTraumaZentrum DGU®) or arthroplasty center (endoCert), among others. Geriatric patients with displaced femoral neck fractures represent a highly relevant entity. The structural and process quality are validated within the framework of certification as both an AltersTraumaZentrum DGU® (ATZ) and arthroplasty center (EPZ), which represents a methodologically challenging approach to the analysis of treatment reality.

Objective: Is there a treatment variation between certified geriatric trauma centers (ATZ) and dual certified geriatric and arthroplasty centers (ATZ+EPZ) with respect to joint-preserving or joint replacement surgical procedures for geriatric displaced femoral neck fractures and short-term complications?

Material and methods: Data from the Registry for Geriatric Trauma of the German Trauma Society (ATR-DGU) from 46 clinics with ATZ and 52 clinics with ATZ + EPZ were analyzed. The follow-up period included both the in-hospital stay and a 120-day follow-up interval. The primary outcome was mortality, secondary endpoints included mobility, reoperations and health status. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to calculate odds ratios (OR) after adjustment for age, gender, ASA score and concomitant injuries.

Results: The median age of the collective (n = 7389) was 84 years, 29.6% and 29.8% respectively were male, the median time until surgery was 20.9 h (ATZ) vs. 20.5 h (ATZ + EPZ) and the median length of stay was 15.1 days for both types of center. The number of joint-preserving interventions was significantly increased in ATZ compared to clinics with dual certification (ATZ: 8.6% vs. ATZ + EPZ: 2.6%; OR = 3.63). The reoperation rate was comparable in the primary stay (3.7% vs. 3.9%) but was significantly increased over the 120-day course in clinics with dual certification (4.1% vs. 6.0%; p = 0.022). Revisions due to periprosthetic fractures occurred more frequently in ATZ without EPZ (8.2% vs. 3.5%). The multivariate analysis showed an increased mortality in the acute phase (OR 1.26; 1.02-1.56; p = 0.031), an increased rate of reoperations in the 120-day course (OR 1.45; 1.06-2.02; p = 0.024) and inpatient readmissions (OR 1.42, 1.02-2.00; p = 0.043) for centers with dual certification.

Conclusion: In Germany an institutional treatment variation for geriatric displaced femoral neck fractures exists. In certified geriatric trauma centers without certified arthroplasty center there is a significantly increased rate of joint-preserving treatment with differences in terms of morbidity and mortality in the acute phase.

[移位股骨颈骨折在德国经认证的老年创伤中心DGU®和关节成形术中心的手术治疗差异]。
背景:在德国有一个几乎独特的认证结构,诊所可以被认证为创伤中心DGU®(创伤中心DGU®),老年创伤中心DGU®(AltrsTraumaZentrum DGU®)或关节成形术中心(endoCert)等。老年患者移位股骨颈骨折是一个高度相关的实体。结构和工艺质量在AltersTraumaZentrum DGU®(ATZ)和关节成形术中心(EPZ)的认证框架内得到验证,这代表了一种方法上具有挑战性的方法来分析治疗现实。目的:老年创伤中心(ATZ)和双重认证的老年和关节置换中心(ATZ+EPZ)对于老年移位性股骨颈骨折和短期并发症的关节保留或关节置换手术治疗是否存在差异?材料和方法:对来自德国创伤学会老年创伤登记处(ATR-DGU)的46家ATZ诊所和52家ATZ + EPZ诊所的数据进行分析。随访期间包括住院时间和120天的随访间隔。主要终点是死亡率,次要终点包括活动能力、再手术和健康状况。进行单因素和多因素分析,计算年龄、性别、ASA评分和伴随损伤校正后的优势比(OR)。结果:患者的中位年龄(n = 7389)为84岁,其中男性占29.6%,男性占29.8%。两种中心的中位手术时间分别为20.9 h (ATZ)和20.5 h (ATZ + EPZ),两种中心的中位住院时间均为15.1天。与双重认证的诊所相比,ATZ的关节保护干预措施数量显著增加(ATZ: 8.6% vs. ATZ + EPZ: 2.6%; OR = 3.63)。初次住院期间的再手术率相当(3.7% vs. 3.9%),但在120天的疗程中,双认证诊所的再手术率显著增加(4.1% vs. 6.0%; p = 0.022)。在没有EPZ的ATZ患者中,假体周围骨折的翻修发生率更高(8.2% vs. 3.5%)。多因素分析显示,在具有双重认证的中心,急性期死亡率增加(OR 1.26; 1.02-1.56; p = 0.031),120天内再手术率增加(OR 1.45; 1.06-2.02; p = 0.024),住院再入院率增加(OR 1.42, 1.02-2.00; p = 0.043)。结论:在德国,老年性股骨颈移位骨折的机构治疗存在差异。在没有关节成形术中心的老年性创伤中心,关节保留治疗在急性期的发病率和死亡率方面显著增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信