I have been scammed in my qualitative research.

IF 10.7 Q1 ETHICS
Carole Bandiera, Kate Lowrie, Donna Thomas, Sabuj Kanti Mistry, Elizabeth Harris, Mark F Harris, Parisa Aslani
{"title":"I have been scammed in my qualitative research.","authors":"Carole Bandiera, Kate Lowrie, Donna Thomas, Sabuj Kanti Mistry, Elizabeth Harris, Mark F Harris, Parisa Aslani","doi":"10.1186/s41073-025-00179-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We have been scammed in our online qualitative study by some fraudulent participants who falsely claimed to be pharmacists or community health workers. These participants were interviewed before we discovered that they were not who they claimed to be.In this commentary, we describe key indicators of potential imposters, such as the number of emails received in a short period of time, emails with similar content and address structure, participants having a keen interest in the reimbursement, camera switched off during the interview, and inconsistency in the participants' responses.We provide recommendations on how to prevent future fraud, such as promoting the study to a closed network or groups on social media, encouraging participants to provide sources that verify their identity, ensuring that the camera is switched on during the entire interview, discouraging the use of artificial intelligence (AI) to answer questions or generate content, unless when AI-based language tools are used to facilitate translation, understanding or communication, providing reimbursements with local vouchers rather than international ones, and where the participants are healthcare professionals, checking their registration number prior to the interview.It is important for Human Research Ethics Committee members to consider genuine measures to assess participant authenticity and reduce the risk of fraudulent participation. Additionally, universities and research institutions should develop guidance to educate researchers in this area. Published protocols, guidelines and checklists for online qualitative studies, and participant information statements and consent forms should be adapted to prevent and address potential fraud. For example, the COREQ checklist should be updated so that researchers report the actions undertaken to prevent and detect fraud and their experiences and actions if there was fraud.Fraud in online research impacts the integrity and quality of online research. Urgent actions are needed to raise awareness of this issue within the research community and prevent further occurrences of scams.</p>","PeriodicalId":74682,"journal":{"name":"Research integrity and peer review","volume":"10 1","pages":"18"},"PeriodicalIF":10.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12398116/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research integrity and peer review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-025-00179-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We have been scammed in our online qualitative study by some fraudulent participants who falsely claimed to be pharmacists or community health workers. These participants were interviewed before we discovered that they were not who they claimed to be.In this commentary, we describe key indicators of potential imposters, such as the number of emails received in a short period of time, emails with similar content and address structure, participants having a keen interest in the reimbursement, camera switched off during the interview, and inconsistency in the participants' responses.We provide recommendations on how to prevent future fraud, such as promoting the study to a closed network or groups on social media, encouraging participants to provide sources that verify their identity, ensuring that the camera is switched on during the entire interview, discouraging the use of artificial intelligence (AI) to answer questions or generate content, unless when AI-based language tools are used to facilitate translation, understanding or communication, providing reimbursements with local vouchers rather than international ones, and where the participants are healthcare professionals, checking their registration number prior to the interview.It is important for Human Research Ethics Committee members to consider genuine measures to assess participant authenticity and reduce the risk of fraudulent participation. Additionally, universities and research institutions should develop guidance to educate researchers in this area. Published protocols, guidelines and checklists for online qualitative studies, and participant information statements and consent forms should be adapted to prevent and address potential fraud. For example, the COREQ checklist should be updated so that researchers report the actions undertaken to prevent and detect fraud and their experiences and actions if there was fraud.Fraud in online research impacts the integrity and quality of online research. Urgent actions are needed to raise awareness of this issue within the research community and prevent further occurrences of scams.

Abstract Image

我在定性研究中被骗了。
在我们的在线定性研究中,我们被一些欺诈性参与者欺骗,他们谎称自己是药剂师或社区卫生工作者。在我们发现这些参与者并不是他们所声称的人之前,我们对他们进行了采访。在这篇评论中,我们描述了潜在冒名顶替者的关键指标,如短时间内收到的电子邮件数量,内容和地址结构相似的电子邮件,参与者对报销有浓厚的兴趣,采访时关闭相机,参与者的回答不一致。我们提供了关于如何防止未来欺诈的建议,例如将研究推广到社交媒体上的封闭网络或群体,鼓励参与者提供验证其身份的来源,确保在整个采访过程中打开摄像头,不鼓励使用人工智能(AI)来回答问题或生成内容,除非使用基于AI的语言工具来促进翻译,理解或沟通。提供当地代金券而不是国际代金券,如果参与者是医疗保健专业人员,则在面谈前检查其注册号。人类研究伦理委员会成员考虑评估参与者真实性和减少欺诈性参与风险的真实措施是很重要的。此外,大学和研究机构应该制定指导方针来教育这方面的研究人员。在线定性研究的已公布的协议、指南和核对表以及参与者信息声明和同意表应加以调整,以防止和解决潜在的欺诈行为。例如,应该更新COREQ检查表,以便研究人员报告为防止和检测欺诈而采取的行动以及他们在发生欺诈时的经验和行动。网络研究中的欺诈行为影响着网络研究的诚信和质量。需要采取紧急行动,提高研究界对这一问题的认识,防止进一步发生欺诈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信