Suganya Sivagurunathan , Patrick Byrne , Alán F. Muñoz , John Arevalo , Anne E. Carpenter , Shantanu Singh , Maria Kost-Alimova , Beth A. Cimini
{"title":"Alternate dyes for image-based profiling assays","authors":"Suganya Sivagurunathan , Patrick Byrne , Alán F. Muñoz , John Arevalo , Anne E. Carpenter , Shantanu Singh , Maria Kost-Alimova , Beth A. Cimini","doi":"10.1016/j.slasd.2025.100268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Cell Painting, the leading image-based profiling assay, involves staining plated cells with six dyes that mark the different compartments in a cell. Such profiles can then be used to discover connections between samples (whether different cell lines, different genetic treatments, or different compound treatments) as well as to assess particular features impacted by each treatment. Researchers may wish to vary the standard dye panel to assess particular phenotypes, or image cells live while maintaining the ability to cluster profiles overall.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this study, we evaluate the performance of dyes that can either replace or augment the traditional Cell Painting dyes or enable tracking live cell dynamics. We perturbed U2OS cells with 90 different compounds and subsequently stained them with either standard Cell Painting dyes (Revvity), or with MitoBrilliant (Tocris) replacing MitoTracker or Phenovue phalloidin 400LS (Revvity) replacing phalloidin. We also tested the live-cell compatible ChromaLive dye (Saguaro).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>All dye sets effectively separated biological replicates of the same sample vs. negative controls (phenotypic activity), although separating from replicates of all other compounds (phenotypic distinctiveness) proved challenging for all dye sets. While individual dye substitutions within the standard Cell Painting panel had minimal impact on assay performance, the live cell dye exhibited distinct performance profiles across different compound classes compared to the standard panel, with later time points more distinct than earlier ones.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Substituting MitoBrilliant or Phenovue phalloidin 400LS for standard mitochondrial or actin dyes minimally impacted Cell Painting assay performance. Phenovue phalloidin 400LS offers the advantage of isolating actin features from Golgi or plasma membrane while accommodating an additional 568 nm dye. Live cell imaging, enabled by ChromaLive dye, provides real-time assessment of compound-induced morphological changes. Combining this with the standard Cell Painting assay significantly expands the feature space for enhanced cellular profiling. Our findings provide data-driven options for researchers selecting dye sets for image-based profiling.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21764,"journal":{"name":"SLAS Discovery","volume":"36 ","pages":"Article 100268"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SLAS Discovery","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2472555225000619","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Cell Painting, the leading image-based profiling assay, involves staining plated cells with six dyes that mark the different compartments in a cell. Such profiles can then be used to discover connections between samples (whether different cell lines, different genetic treatments, or different compound treatments) as well as to assess particular features impacted by each treatment. Researchers may wish to vary the standard dye panel to assess particular phenotypes, or image cells live while maintaining the ability to cluster profiles overall.
Methods
In this study, we evaluate the performance of dyes that can either replace or augment the traditional Cell Painting dyes or enable tracking live cell dynamics. We perturbed U2OS cells with 90 different compounds and subsequently stained them with either standard Cell Painting dyes (Revvity), or with MitoBrilliant (Tocris) replacing MitoTracker or Phenovue phalloidin 400LS (Revvity) replacing phalloidin. We also tested the live-cell compatible ChromaLive dye (Saguaro).
Results
All dye sets effectively separated biological replicates of the same sample vs. negative controls (phenotypic activity), although separating from replicates of all other compounds (phenotypic distinctiveness) proved challenging for all dye sets. While individual dye substitutions within the standard Cell Painting panel had minimal impact on assay performance, the live cell dye exhibited distinct performance profiles across different compound classes compared to the standard panel, with later time points more distinct than earlier ones.
Discussion
Substituting MitoBrilliant or Phenovue phalloidin 400LS for standard mitochondrial or actin dyes minimally impacted Cell Painting assay performance. Phenovue phalloidin 400LS offers the advantage of isolating actin features from Golgi or plasma membrane while accommodating an additional 568 nm dye. Live cell imaging, enabled by ChromaLive dye, provides real-time assessment of compound-induced morphological changes. Combining this with the standard Cell Painting assay significantly expands the feature space for enhanced cellular profiling. Our findings provide data-driven options for researchers selecting dye sets for image-based profiling.
期刊介绍:
Advancing Life Sciences R&D: SLAS Discovery reports how scientists develop and utilize novel technologies and/or approaches to provide and characterize chemical and biological tools to understand and treat human disease.
SLAS Discovery is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes scientific reports that enable and improve target validation, evaluate current drug discovery technologies, provide novel research tools, and incorporate research approaches that enhance depth of knowledge and drug discovery success.
SLAS Discovery emphasizes scientific and technical advances in target identification/validation (including chemical probes, RNA silencing, gene editing technologies); biomarker discovery; assay development; virtual, medium- or high-throughput screening (biochemical and biological, biophysical, phenotypic, toxicological, ADME); lead generation/optimization; chemical biology; and informatics (data analysis, image analysis, statistics, bio- and chemo-informatics). Review articles on target biology, new paradigms in drug discovery and advances in drug discovery technologies.
SLAS Discovery is of particular interest to those involved in analytical chemistry, applied microbiology, automation, biochemistry, bioengineering, biomedical optics, biotechnology, bioinformatics, cell biology, DNA science and technology, genetics, information technology, medicinal chemistry, molecular biology, natural products chemistry, organic chemistry, pharmacology, spectroscopy, and toxicology.
SLAS Discovery is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and was published previously (1996-2016) as the Journal of Biomolecular Screening (JBS).