Rethinking trade-offs in nature-based solutions from a multispecies justice perspective.

IF 8.8 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
npj urban sustainability Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-18 DOI:10.1038/s42949-025-00261-5
Katinka Wijsman, Melissa Pineda-Pinto, Simo Sarkki, Charlotte Stijnen, Janneke den Dekker-Arlain, Christopher M Raymond
{"title":"Rethinking trade-offs in nature-based solutions from a multispecies justice perspective.","authors":"Katinka Wijsman, Melissa Pineda-Pinto, Simo Sarkki, Charlotte Stijnen, Janneke den Dekker-Arlain, Christopher M Raymond","doi":"10.1038/s42949-025-00261-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Trade-offs in nature-based solutions are increasingly recognized, with novel research interrogating their justice implications. Yet, these trade-offs and justice implications remain entrenched in an anthropocentric orientation, which is problematic in ecological and ethical terms. We discuss four common assumptions on trade-offs in NBS (instrumentalism, neutrality of science, collaborative consensus, and unitemporality) and rethink them through a multispecies justice lens, maintaining that dealing with trade-offs is a form of interspecies politics.</p>","PeriodicalId":74322,"journal":{"name":"npj urban sustainability","volume":"5 1","pages":"67"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12360955/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"npj urban sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s42949-025-00261-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Trade-offs in nature-based solutions are increasingly recognized, with novel research interrogating their justice implications. Yet, these trade-offs and justice implications remain entrenched in an anthropocentric orientation, which is problematic in ecological and ethical terms. We discuss four common assumptions on trade-offs in NBS (instrumentalism, neutrality of science, collaborative consensus, and unitemporality) and rethink them through a multispecies justice lens, maintaining that dealing with trade-offs is a form of interspecies politics.

从多物种正义的角度重新思考基于自然的解决方案的权衡。
基于自然的解决方案的权衡越来越被认识到,新的研究质疑其正义含义。然而,这些权衡和正义的影响在人类中心取向中仍然根深蒂固,这在生态和伦理方面是有问题的。我们讨论了国家统计局中关于权衡的四个常见假设(工具主义、科学中立性、协作共识和统一性),并通过多物种正义的视角重新思考它们,认为处理权衡是一种物种间政治形式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信