[Revision analysis and successful solutions for my failed primary total knee arthroplasties].

IF 0.5
Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-03 DOI:10.1007/s00132-025-04714-8
Friedrich Boettner, Mohammed El-Hassan, Johannes M Herold
{"title":"[Revision analysis and successful solutions for my failed primary total knee arthroplasties].","authors":"Friedrich Boettner, Mohammed El-Hassan, Johannes M Herold","doi":"10.1007/s00132-025-04714-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The treatment of patients following primary total knee arthroplasty requiring revision surgery is one of the most demanding tasks in orthopedic surgery. A careful failure analysis and a systematic approach are of great importance for the often very individual situations. In addition to excellent technical skills, preoperative planning is of great importance.</p><p><strong>Question: </strong>This paper describes the preoperative assessment and planning, as well as the technical strategy for the revision of primary knee arthroplasties.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Beside a review of the existing literature, the article introduces the senior author's revision strategies based on 20 years of experience in total joint replacement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Adequate preoperative imaging, laboratory tests and, if necessary, joint aspiration are essential for the individual diagnostics and planning of the revision procedure. The article focuses on the prophylaxis and treatment options for acute and chronic periprosthetic joint infections, aseptic implant loosening, arthrofibrosis and joint instability.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>It is often a challenge for the surgeon to face his/her own patient requiring a revision surgery, and the patient expects the same result for these technical, often much more demanding operations as for the primary surgery. This inherent conflict results in considerable challenges for the arthroplasty surgeon.</p>","PeriodicalId":74375,"journal":{"name":"Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany)","volume":" ","pages":"760-768"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-025-04714-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The treatment of patients following primary total knee arthroplasty requiring revision surgery is one of the most demanding tasks in orthopedic surgery. A careful failure analysis and a systematic approach are of great importance for the often very individual situations. In addition to excellent technical skills, preoperative planning is of great importance.

Question: This paper describes the preoperative assessment and planning, as well as the technical strategy for the revision of primary knee arthroplasties.

Material and methods: Beside a review of the existing literature, the article introduces the senior author's revision strategies based on 20 years of experience in total joint replacement.

Results: Adequate preoperative imaging, laboratory tests and, if necessary, joint aspiration are essential for the individual diagnostics and planning of the revision procedure. The article focuses on the prophylaxis and treatment options for acute and chronic periprosthetic joint infections, aseptic implant loosening, arthrofibrosis and joint instability.

Discussion: It is often a challenge for the surgeon to face his/her own patient requiring a revision surgery, and the patient expects the same result for these technical, often much more demanding operations as for the primary surgery. This inherent conflict results in considerable challenges for the arthroplasty surgeon.

【原发性全膝关节置换术失败的修正分析及成功对策】。
背景:原发性全膝关节置换术后需要翻修手术的患者的治疗是骨科手术中最艰巨的任务之一。仔细的故障分析和系统的方法对于通常非常个别的情况非常重要。除了出色的技术技能外,术前规划也非常重要。问题:本文描述了原发性膝关节置换术的术前评估和计划,以及翻修术的技术策略。材料和方法:在回顾现有文献的基础上,介绍了资深作者基于20年全关节置换术经验的修改策略。结果:充分的术前成像、实验室检查和必要时的关节抽吸对于个体诊断和翻修程序的规划是必不可少的。本文重点介绍急性和慢性假体周围关节感染、无菌性假体松动、关节纤维化和关节不稳定的预防和治疗方案。讨论:对于外科医生来说,面对需要翻修手术的患者往往是一个挑战,患者期望这些技术上的、通常要求更高的手术与初次手术的结果相同。这种内在的冲突给关节置换术医生带来了相当大的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信