Are orthopaedic trauma surgeons at risk of occupational noise-induced hearing loss?

Vincent W Lau, Stephanie A Kwan, Jack Graham, Gregory K Deirmengian
{"title":"Are orthopaedic trauma surgeons at risk of occupational noise-induced hearing loss?","authors":"Vincent W Lau, Stephanie A Kwan, Jack Graham, Gregory K Deirmengian","doi":"10.1097/OI9.0000000000000422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Orthopaedic surgeons are at risk of occupational, noise-induced hearing loss due to exposure to instruments in the operating room. The primary objective of this study was to determine whether orthopaedic trauma procedures exceed recommended decibel (dB) limits. The secondary objective was to demonstrate which actions during a case create the highest sound levels.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Intraoperative recordings were taken during orthopaedic trauma surgeries and classified into open reduction internal fixation (ORIF), intramedullary nailing, closed reduction percutaneous pinning, external fixation, soft tissue procedures, or a combination thereof. Recordings were taken of drilling, screw insertion, suctioning, saw use, and mallet striking. Decibel levels were reported as maximum dB level (MDL), LAeq, LCpeak, and time weighted average (TWA). Percentage of allowable daily noise was reported as dose, while the dose predicted for an 8-hour period was reported as projected dose.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 89 recordings were collected, comprising 46 baseline and 43 trauma case recordings. All procedures had significantly higher dB levels compared with controls for all variables (<i>P</i> < 0.001). In all cases, the MDL was greater than 85 dB. ORIF had the highest average MDL (108.4 dB) and TWA (70.3 dB). Overall, no procedures exceeded the maximum allowable daily noise dose. However, the soft tissue group had the highest projected dose (18.8%). Suctioning against soft tissue had the highest dose and projected dose.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Orthopaedic trauma procedures stayed within noise limits, but average MDL exceeded 85 dB. ORIF and suctioning produced some of the highest sound levels among procedures and recorded steps.</p>","PeriodicalId":74381,"journal":{"name":"OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma","volume":"8 3","pages":"e422"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12377292/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OI9.0000000000000422","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Orthopaedic surgeons are at risk of occupational, noise-induced hearing loss due to exposure to instruments in the operating room. The primary objective of this study was to determine whether orthopaedic trauma procedures exceed recommended decibel (dB) limits. The secondary objective was to demonstrate which actions during a case create the highest sound levels.

Methods: Intraoperative recordings were taken during orthopaedic trauma surgeries and classified into open reduction internal fixation (ORIF), intramedullary nailing, closed reduction percutaneous pinning, external fixation, soft tissue procedures, or a combination thereof. Recordings were taken of drilling, screw insertion, suctioning, saw use, and mallet striking. Decibel levels were reported as maximum dB level (MDL), LAeq, LCpeak, and time weighted average (TWA). Percentage of allowable daily noise was reported as dose, while the dose predicted for an 8-hour period was reported as projected dose.

Results: A total of 89 recordings were collected, comprising 46 baseline and 43 trauma case recordings. All procedures had significantly higher dB levels compared with controls for all variables (P < 0.001). In all cases, the MDL was greater than 85 dB. ORIF had the highest average MDL (108.4 dB) and TWA (70.3 dB). Overall, no procedures exceeded the maximum allowable daily noise dose. However, the soft tissue group had the highest projected dose (18.8%). Suctioning against soft tissue had the highest dose and projected dose.

Conclusion: Orthopaedic trauma procedures stayed within noise limits, but average MDL exceeded 85 dB. ORIF and suctioning produced some of the highest sound levels among procedures and recorded steps.

骨科创伤外科医生有职业性噪声诱发听力损失的风险吗?
目的:骨科医生因在手术室接触器械而面临职业性、噪声性听力损失的风险。本研究的主要目的是确定骨科创伤手术是否超过推荐的分贝(dB)限制。第二个目标是证明在一个案例中哪些动作产生了最高的声音水平。方法:在骨科创伤手术中进行术中记录,并将其分为切开复位内固定(ORIF)、髓内钉、经皮闭合复位内钉、外固定、软组织手术或其组合。记录钻孔、螺钉插入、抽吸、锯子使用和锤击。分贝水平报告为最大分贝水平(MDL)、LAeq、LCpeak和时间加权平均(TWA)。每日允许噪声的百分比报告为剂量,而8小时内的预测剂量报告为预计剂量。结果:共收集记录89份,其中基线记录46份,创伤病例记录43份。与对照组相比,所有手术的dB水平均显著升高(P < 0.001)。所有病例的MDL均大于85 dB。ORIF的平均MDL (108.4 dB)和TWA (70.3 dB)最高。总的来说,没有任何程序超过最大允许的每日噪音剂量。然而,软组织组的预计剂量最高(18.8%)。软组织吸吸剂量最高,投射剂量最高。结论:骨科创伤手术过程的噪声在限制范围内,但平均MDL超过85 dB。在所有程序和记录的步骤中,ORIF和吸痰产生的声音水平最高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信