Performance of Artificial Intelligence Models in Predicting Responsiveness of Hepatocellular Carcinoma to Transarterial Chemoembolization (TACE): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Iman Kiani, Iman Razeghian, Parya Valizadeh, Yasmin Esmaeilian, Payam Jannatdoust, Bardia Khosravi
{"title":"Performance of Artificial Intelligence Models in Predicting Responsiveness of Hepatocellular Carcinoma to Transarterial Chemoembolization (TACE): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Iman Kiani, Iman Razeghian, Parya Valizadeh, Yasmin Esmaeilian, Payam Jannatdoust, Bardia Khosravi","doi":"10.1016/j.jacr.2025.08.028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Handcrafted radiomics (HCR) and deep learning (DL) models have emerged as promising predictive tools extracting granular insights from images.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the predictive performance of these artificial intelligence models in predicting treatment efficacy in patients with HCC who are undergoing transarterial chemoembolization (TACE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases up to June 15, 2024. Inclusion criteria encompassed studies involving patients with confirmed HCC undergoing TACE. Random-effects diagnostic test accuracy meta-analyses were performed using bivariate modeling. Methodological quality was assessed using the Prediction model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-seven studies were included in this review. The overall meta-analysis of models for TACE treatment response included 11 studies. The pooled area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.89 (95% confidence interval: 0.81-0.93) for internal validation and 0.81 (95% confidence interval: 0.80-0.92) for external validation, with no significant differences (P = .66). Moreover, no significant differences were found between DL and HCR models (P = .21) or between models with and without clinical data (P = .78).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Artificial intelligence models, including DL and HCR, show potential for predicting treatment outcomes in patients with HCC who are undergoing TACE. However, the observed heterogeneity stresses the need for further research.</p>","PeriodicalId":73968,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2025.08.028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Handcrafted radiomics (HCR) and deep learning (DL) models have emerged as promising predictive tools extracting granular insights from images.

Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the predictive performance of these artificial intelligence models in predicting treatment efficacy in patients with HCC who are undergoing transarterial chemoembolization (TACE).

Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases up to June 15, 2024. Inclusion criteria encompassed studies involving patients with confirmed HCC undergoing TACE. Random-effects diagnostic test accuracy meta-analyses were performed using bivariate modeling. Methodological quality was assessed using the Prediction model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool.

Results: Twenty-seven studies were included in this review. The overall meta-analysis of models for TACE treatment response included 11 studies. The pooled area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.89 (95% confidence interval: 0.81-0.93) for internal validation and 0.81 (95% confidence interval: 0.80-0.92) for external validation, with no significant differences (P = .66). Moreover, no significant differences were found between DL and HCR models (P = .21) or between models with and without clinical data (P = .78).

Conclusion: Artificial intelligence models, including DL and HCR, show potential for predicting treatment outcomes in patients with HCC who are undergoing TACE. However, the observed heterogeneity stresses the need for further research.

人工智能模型在预测肝细胞癌对经动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)反应性方面的表现:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
背景:肝细胞癌(HCC)仍然是世界范围内癌症相关死亡的主要原因。手工制作放射组学(HCR)和深度学习(DL)模型已经成为从图像中提取颗粒洞察的有前途的预测工具。目的:本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估这些AI模型在预测HCC患者经动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)治疗效果方面的预测性能。方法:综合检索PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane Library数据库,检索时间截止到2024年6月15日。纳入标准包括确诊HCC患者接受TACE治疗的研究。采用双变量模型进行随机效应诊断测试准确性meta分析。采用预测模型偏倚风险评估工具(PROBAST)评估方法学质量。结果:本综述纳入了27项研究。TACE治疗反应模型的整体荟萃分析包括11项研究。内部验证的合并AUROC为0.89 (95% CI: 0.81 - 0.93),外部验证的合并AUROC为0.81 (95% CI: 0.80 - 0.92),两者无显著差异(p = 0.66)。此外,DL和HCR模型之间无显著差异(p = 0.21),有和没有临床资料的模型之间无显著差异(p = 0.78)。结论:AI模型,包括DL和HCR,显示出预测肝癌患者接受TACE治疗结果的潜力。然而,观察到的异质性强调了进一步研究的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信